Many technical documents present information both graphically and verbally. While much is known about the verbal tools of technical professionals, technical graphics have been less fully examined. Here the drawings of a United States patent are examined revealing a system for organizing and presenting visual information that is analogous to commonly-used models for organizing and presenting verbal information.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
WinsorD. A., What Counts as Writing? An Argument from Engineers' Practice. Journal of Advanced Composition, 12: 2, pp. 337–347, 1992.
2.
ShigleyJ. and MischkeC., Mechanical Design Engineering, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1989.
3.
WinsorD. A., Writing Like an Engineer: A Rhetorical Education, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, New Jersey, 1996.
VaughanD., The Challenger Launch Decision: Risky Technology, Culture and Deviance at NASA, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1996.
6.
WinsorD. A., Communication Failures Contributing to the Challenger Accident: An Example for Technical Communicators, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 31: 3, pp. 101–107, 1988.
7.
TufteE., The Visual Display of Quantitative Information, Graphics Press, Cheshire Connecticut, 1983.
GeorgeD., From Analysis to Design: Visual Communication in the Teaching of Writing, College Composition and Communication, 54: 1, pp. 11–39, 2002.
10.
HocksM. E., Understanding Visual Rhetoric in Digital Writing Environments, College Composition and Communication, 54: 4, pp. 629–656, 2003.
11.
WilliamsT., Text or Graphic: An Information Processing Perspective on Choosing the More Effective Medium, Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 23: 1, pp. 33–52, 1993.
12.
WinnW., The Role of Graphics in Training Documents: Toward an Explanatory Theory of How they Communicate, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 32: 4, pp. 300–309, 1989.
13.
BoothW.ColombJ., and WilliamsJ., The Craft of Research, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1995.
14.
AlleyM., The Craft of Scientific Writing, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1996.
15.
LevinJ.AnglinG., and CarneyR., On Empirically Validating Functions of Pictures in Prose, in The Psychology of Illustration Volume 1, WillowsD. M. and HoughtonH. A. (eds.), Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 51–85, 1987.
16.
PeeckJ., The Role of Illustrations in Processing and Remembering Illustrated Text, in The Psychology of Illlustration Volume 1, WillowsD. M. and HoughtonH. A. (eds.), Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 115–151, 1987.
17.
YouraS., Letter from the Guest Editor, Language and Learning Across the Disciplines Special Issue: Communications Across the Engineering Curriculum, 3: 2, pp. 1–12, 1999.
18.
PerelmanL. C.ParadisJ., and BarrettE., The Mayfield Handbook of Technical and Scientific Writing, Mayfield Publishing Co., Mountain View, California, 1998.
19.
WinnB., Charts, Graphs, and Diagrams in Educational Materials, in The Psychology of Illustration Volume 1, WillowsD. M. and HoughtonH. A. (eds.), Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 152–198, 1987.
20.
SwalesJ. M., Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1990.
21.
MooreP. and FitzC., Using Gestalt Theory to Teach Document Design and Graphics, Technical Communication Quarterly, 2: 4, pp. 389–410, 1993.
22.
KressG.Leite-GarciaR., and van LeeuwenT., Discourse Semiotics, in Discourse as Structure and Process, van DijkT. (ed.), Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, California, pp. 257–291, 1997.
23.
FahnestockJ., Verbal and Visual Parallelism, Written Communication, 20: 2, pp. 123–152, 2003.
24.
WilkinsonL., The Grammar of Graphics, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1999.
25.
DoblinJ., A Sructure for Nontextual Communications, in Processing of Visible Language 2, KolersP. A.WrolstadM. E., and BoumaH. (eds.), Plenum Press, New York, pp. 89–111, 1980.
26.
GoldsmithE., The Analysis of Illustration in Theory and Practice, in The Psychology of Illustration Volume 2, HoughtonH. A. and WillowsD. M. (eds.), Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 53–85, 1987.
27.
SzlichcinskiK. P., The Syntax of Pictorial Instructions, in Processing of Visible Language 2, KolersP. A.WrolstadM. E., and BoumaH. (eds.), Plenum Press, New York, pp. 89–111, 1980.
28.
TomlinR.ForrestL.PuM., and KimM., Discourse Semantics, in Discourse as Structure and Process, van DijkT. (ed.), Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, California, pp. 60–111, 1997.
29.
BazermanC., Theoretical Integration in Experimental Reports in Twentieth-Century Physics: Spectroscopic Articles in Physical Review, 1893–1980, in Shaping Written Knowledge: The Genre and Activity of'the Experimental Article in Science, The University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, Wisconsin, pp. 153–186, 1988.
30.
BazermanC., The Languages of Edison's Light, The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1999.
31.
MartinJ. R., Literacy in Science: Learning to Handle Text as Technology, in Writing Science: Literary and Discursive Power, HallidayM. A. K. and MartinJ. R. (eds.), The University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, pp. 166–202, 1993.
32.
van DijkT. and KintschW., Strategies of Discourse Comprehension, Academic Press, New York, 1983.
33.
HallidayM. A. K. and HasanR., Cohesion in English, Longman Press, London, 1976.
34.
EhrlichM., Metacognitive Monitoring of Text Cohesion in Children, in The Construction of Mental Representations during Reading, van OostendorpH. and GoldmanS. R. (eds.), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, New Jersey, pp. 281–301, 1999.
35.
LorchR. F., Integration of Topic Information During Reading, in Sources of Coherence in Reading, LorchR. F. and O'BrienE. J. (eds.), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, New Jersey, pp. 279–294, 1995.
36.
DopkinsS. and NordlieJ., Processes of Anaphor Resolution, in Sources of Coherence in Reading, LorchR. F. and O'BrienE. J. (eds.), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, New Jersey, pp. 145–158, 1995.
37.
LannonJ. M., Technical Communication, Longman Press, New York, 2003.
38.
WilliamsJ. M., Style: Toward Clarity and Grace, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1990.
39.
MartinJ. R., Life as a Noun: Arresting the Universe in Science and Humanities, in Writing Science: Literary and Discurvive Power, HallidayM. A. K. and MartinJ. R. (eds.), The University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, pp. 221–267, 1993.
40.
KintschW. and van DijkT., Toward a Model of Text Comprehension and Production, Psychological Review, 85, pp. 363–394, 1978.
41.
FraseL. T., Prose Processing, in The Psychology of Learning and Motivation: Advances in Research and Theory, BowerG. H. (ed.), Academic Press, New York, pp. 1–47, 1975.
42.
AndersonR. C.SpiroR. J., and AndersonM. C., Schemata as Scaffolding for the Representation of Information in Connected Discourse, American Educational Research Journal, 15, pp. 433–440, 1978.
43.
PinchertJ. W. and AndersonR. C., Taking Different Perspectives on a Story, Journal of Educational Psychology, 69, pp. 309–315, 1977.
44.
GegenheimerH. W.SiebkeD., and SiebkeC., Sheet Handling Mechanism and Method for Multi-Color Perfector Press, United States Patent and Trademark Office, #2,757,610, Issued 1957.
45.
KearfottKimberlee and DonnellJeffrey, Teaching Radiation Safety Students to Write: A Classroom Strategy, Radiation Protection Management, 17: 2, pp. 23–29, 2000.
46.
DonnellJeffreyGableAmanda, and Petraglia-BhariJoseph, Writing vs. Content, Skills vs. Rhetoric: More and Less False Dichotomies, Languages and Learning Across the Disciplines, 3: 2, pp. 113–117, 1999.
