Past research has demonstrated that the characteristics of substance abusers vary considerably. Often, however, addicts are considered members of a single, homogeneous group. These erroneous designations may indeed prevent the successful rehabilitation of substance abusers. In the present study, hierarchical and K-means cluster analyses are used to identify a typology of substance users from a sample of 1,580 St. Louis arrestees surveyed through the Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring (ADAM) Program. Five clusters are yielded in the present analysis. The analyses illustrate not only that drug-using classifications differ between criminal and non-criminal populations, but that arrestee populations themselves vary interjurisdictionally. Given these findings, implications for local and regional drug treatment programs are assessed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BallS. A.CarrollK. M.BaborT. F.RounsavilleB. J., Subtypes of Cocaine Abusers: Support for a Type A-Type B Distinction, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 63, pp. 115–124, 1995.
2.
BallS. A.TennenH.PolingJ. C.KranzlerH. R.RounsavilleB. J., Personality, Temperament, and Character Dimensions and the DSM-IV Personality Disorders, Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 106:4, pp. 545–553, 1997.
3.
CohenA., A Psychosocial Typology of Drug Addicts and Implications for Treatment, International Journal of the Addictions, 21, pp. 147–154, 1986.
4.
CraigR. J.BivensA.OlsonR., MCMI-III-Derived Typological Analysis of Cocaine and Heroin Addicts, Journal of Personality Assessment, 69:3, pp. 583–595, 1997.
5.
HowardM. O.KivlahanD.WalkerR. D., Cloninger's Tridimensional Theory of Personality and Psychopathology, Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 58, pp. 48–66, 1997.
6.
NaceE. P.DavisC. W.GaspariJ. P., Axis II Comorbidity in Substance Abusers, American Journal of Psychiatry, 148, pp. 118–120, 1991.
7.
NurcoD.HanlonT.BalterM.KinlockT.SlaghtE., A Classification of Narcotic Addicts Based on Type, Amount and Severity of Crime, Journal of Drug Issues, 21, pp. 429–448, 1991.
8.
RounsavilleB. J.KranzlerH. R.BallS. A.TennenH.PolingJ. C.TrifflemanE., Personality Disorders in Substance Abusers: Relation to Substance Use, Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 186:2, pp. 87–95, 1998.
9.
SolomonP., Medical Management of Drug Dependence, Journal of the American Medical Association, 206, pp. 1521–1526, 1968.
YacoubianG.KaneR., Identifying a Drug Use Typology of Philadelphia Arrestees: A Cluster Analysis, Journal of Drug Issues, 28:2, pp. 559–574, 1998.
12.
HepburnJ., Classifying Drug Offenders for Treatment, in Drugs and Crime: Evaluating Public Policy Perspectives, MacKenzieD.UchidaC. (eds.), Sage Publications, California, pp. 172–187, 1994.
13.
HserY., A Referral System that Matches Drug Users to Treatment Programs: Existing Research and Relevant Issues, Journal of Drug Issues, 25, pp. 209–224, 1995.
14.
MieczkowskiT.AnglinM. D.ColettiS.JohnsonB. D.NadelmannE. A.WishE. D., Responding to America's Drug Problems, Journal of Urban Affairs, 14, pp. 337–357, 1992.
15.
WellischJ.PrendergastM. L.AnglinM. D., Toward a Drug Abuse Treatment System, Journal of Drug Issues, 25, pp. 759–782, 1995.
16.
Institute of Medicine, Matching, in Committee for the Study of Treatment and Rehabilitation for Alcoholism and Alcohol Abuse: Broadening the Base of Treatment for Alcohol Problems, National Academy Press, Washington, D.C., pp. 279–312, 1990.
17.
VisherC., A Comparison of Urinalysis Technologies for Drug Testing in Criminal Justice, National Institute of Justice Research Report, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., 1991.
HarrisonL., The Validity of Self-Reported Data on Drug Use, Journal of Drug Issues, 25, pp. 91–111, 1995.
20.
RosenfeldR.DeckerS., Discrepant Values, Correlated Measures: Cross-City and Longitudinal Comparisons of Self-Reports and Urine Tests of Cocaine Use Among Arrestees, Journal of Criminal Justice, 21, pp. 223–230, 1993.
21.
DuntemanG., Principal Components Analysis, Sage Publications, London, 1989.
22.
MunroB.PageE., Statistical Methods for Health Care Research (2nd Edition), J. B. Lippincott Company, Philadelphia, 1993.
23.
InciardiJ.McElrathK., The American Drug Scene, Roxbury Publishing Company, California, 1998.
24.
AwaltR. M.ReillyP. M.ShopshireM. S., The Angry Patient: An Intervention for Managing Anger in Substance Abuse Treatment, Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, 29, pp. 353–358, 1997.
25.
RossH. E.CutlerM.SklarS. M., Retention in Substance Abuse Treatment: Role of Psychiatric Symptom Severity, American Journal on Addictions, 6:4, pp. 293–303, 1997.
26.
WarrenM. Q., Classification of Offenders, Journal of Criminal Law, Crime, and Social Policy, 62, pp. 239–258, 1971.
27.
National Institute of Justice, 1997 Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring (ADAM) Annual Report, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., 1998.
28.
National Institute of Justice, 1996 Drug Use Forecasting (DUF) Annual Report, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., 1997.
29.
National Institute of Justice, 1995 Drug Use Forecasting (DUF) Annual Report, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., 1996.
30.
National Institute of Justice, NIJ's Drug Use Forecasting Program, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., 1993.
31.
National Institute of Justice, 1991 Drug Use Forecasting (DUF) Program Annual Report, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., 1992.
