The rationale behind adult foster care (AFC) has been that “participation in the life of the family” is superior to institutionalization. The extent to which AFC is familial has been widely debated, ranging from claims that this environment provides a surrogate family, to claims that it is no more than a mini-institution. This paper discusses the extent to which elderly clients are integrated into the family and the method by which such integration was measured in a sample of one hundred adult foster homes in New York State. The four dimensions used to measure familism were Affection, Social Interaction, the performance of Ritual, and the minimization of Social Distance.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BradshawR.VondehaarW.KenneyV.TylerR. S. and HarrisS., Community Based Residential Care for the Minimally Impaired Elderly: A Survey Analysis, paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Geriatrics Society, Miami, April 1975.
2.
DeinesH. G.BradshawB. R. and BlakelyE., Invisible Institution: Adult Foster Care in the U.S.A., paper presented at the annual meeting of the Gerontological Society, New York City, October 1976.
3.
KahanaE. and CoeR., Alternatives in Long-Term Care, SherwoodS. (ed.), Long-Term Care, Spectrum Publications, New York, 1975.
4.
New York State Department of Social Services, Report on Family-Type Private Proprietary Homes for Adults, 1971.
5.
New York State Department of Social Services, Report on a Statewide Review of Family-Type Adult Domiciliary Care Facilities in New York State, 1971.
6.
New York State Department of Mental Hygiene, Department Policy Manual, 1974.
7.
New York State Department of Social Services, Foster-Family Care for Adult Programs (Bulletin 188), March 1973.
8.
TouissaintJ. and ButlerP., Placement of Suitable Psychogeriatric Patients in Boarding Houses, Medical Journal of Australia, 1, pp. 904–906, 1967.
9.
ParksJ. M., Characteristics of Family Care Sponsors, unpublished master's thesis, University of Utah, 1959.
10.
GiovannoniJ. M. and UllmanL., Characteristics of Family Care Homes, Journal of Clinical Psychology, 14, pp. 299–306, 1958.
11.
CunninghamK.BotwinkW.DolsonJ. and WeickertA., Community Placement of Released Mental Patients: A Five Year Study, Social Work, 14:1, pp. 54–61, 1969.
12.
LeeD. T., Family Care: Selection and Prediction, American Journal of Psychiatry, 120, pp. 561–566, 1963.
13.
LyleC. M. and TrailO., A Study of Psychiatric Patients in Foster Homes, Social Work, 6:1, pp. 82–88, 1961.
14.
UllmannL. P. and BerkmanV. C., Judgements of Outcome of Home Care Placement from Psychological Material, Journal of Clinical Psychology, 15:1. pp. 28–31, 1959.
15.
BurgessE. W. and LockeH. J., The Family, The American Book Company, New York, 1948.
16.
BossardJ. H. S. and BollE. S., Ritual in Family Living, University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia, 1950.
17.
WilkeningE. A., Change in Form Technology as Related to Familism, Family Decision Making, and Family Integration, American Sociological Review, 19, pp. 29–37, 1954.
18.
RogersE. M. and SebaldH., A Distinction Between Familism, Family Integration, and Kinship Orientation, Marriage and Family Living, 24, pp. 25–30, 1962.
19.
KerckhoffA. C., Norm-Value Clusters and the Strain Toward Consistency Among Older Married Couples, SimpsonI. H. and McKinneyJ. C. (eds.), Social Aspects of Aging, Duke University Press, Durham, 1966.
20.
CavanR. S., Speculations on Innovations to Conventional Marriage in Old Age, The Gerontologist, 13:4, pp. 409–411, 1973.
21.
JansenL. T., Measuring Family Solidarity, American Sociological Review, 17, pp. 727–733, 1952.
22.
KlappO. E., Ritual and Family Solidarity, Social Forces, 37, pp. 212–214, 1959.
23.
ShermanS. R., Patterns of Contacts for Residents of Age-Segregated and Age-Integrated Housing, Journal of Gerontology, 30:1, pp. 103–107, 1975.
24.
BultenaG. L. and WoodV., The American Retirement Community: Bane or Blessing?Journal of Gerontology, 24, pp. 209–217, 1969.
25.
CarpF. M., A Future for the Aged: Victoria Plaza and its Residents, University of Texas Press, Austin, 1966.
26.
MurphyH. B. M.PenneeB. and LuckensD., Foster Homes: The New Backwards? (CMH Supplement 71). Journal of the Department of National Health and Welfare, Ottawa, Canada, September-October 1972.
27.
TaietzP., The Extended Family in Transition: A Study of the Family Life of Old People in the Netherlands, Sociologia Ruralis, 4: 1, pp. 63–74, 1964.
28.
NewmanS., Housing Adjustments of Aging Parents have Strong Impact on Their Families (Newsletter, 5), Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Winter 1977.
