Inequalities in experiences with medical care are well-known in the United States, but little is known about the shape of such inequalities in other countries. This study compares a broad spectrum of experiences in the United States and United Kingdom. Furthermore, it focuses on two of the most important dimensions of inequality, race/ethnicity and income, and two of the most widely discussed system-level factors, health insurance and emphasis on primary care. Two general conclusions are reached. First, there are broad income-based inequalities in medical care in both the United States and United Kingdom. These inequalities persist even after controlling for health insurance, including private medical insurance in the United Kingdom. Race is also related to experiences with medical care, although the effects of race are more particular and contingent than are those for income. In particular, the mapping of racial/ethnic inequality differs considerably between the United States and United Kingdom, reflecting their different sociocultural climates. Second, the health care system, especially primary care, plays a limited role in ameliorating inequalities in care, but plays a strong role in elevating the average level of quality within a country. Because inequalities in medical care reflect broader social processes, they are durable across very different health care systems and contexts.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AdlerN. E., and NewmanK.Socioeconomic disparities in health: Pathways and policies. Health Aff. (Millwood)21:60–76, 2002.
2.
BurstinH. R.LipsitzS. R., and BrennanT. A.Socioeconomic status and risk for substandard medical care. JAMA268:2383–2387, 1992.
3.
SmedleyB. D.StithA. Y., and NelsonA. R.Unequal Treatment: Confronting Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Health Care.National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 2003.
4.
ExworthyM.BlaneD., and MarmotM.Tackling health inequalities in the United Kingdom: The progress and pitfalls of policy. Health Serv. Res.38:1905–1921, 2003.
5.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.Healthy People 2010.U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, 2000.
6.
Lillie-BlantonM., and HoffmanC.The role of health insurance coverage in reducing racial/ethnic disparities in health care. Health Aff. (Millwood)24:398–408, 2005.
7.
MonheitA. C., and VistnesJ.Health insurance coverage and access to care. Med. Care Res. Rev.57:11–35, 2000.
8.
StarfieldB.Primary Care.Oxford University Press, New York, 1998.
9.
BalsaA. I., and McGuireT. G.Prejudice, clinical uncertainty and stereotyping as sources of health disparities. J. Health Econ.22:89–116, 2003.
10.
SymeS. L.Social and economic disparities in health: Thoughts about intervention. Milbank Q.76:493–5051998.
11.
AdlerN.Socioeconomic status and health: No easy solution. JAMA269: 3140–3145, 1993.
12.
KriegerN.Shades of difference: Theoretical underpinnings of the medical controversy on black/white differences in the United States, 1830–1870. Int. J. Health Serv.17:259–278, 1987.
13.
van RynM., and BurkeJ.The effect of patient race and socioeconomic status on physicians' perceptions of patients. Soc. Sci. Med.50:813–828, 2000.
14.
LouryG. C.ModoodT., and TelesS. M.Introduction. In Ethnicity, Social Mobility, and Public Policy: Comparing the US and UK, ed. LouryG. C.ModoodT., and TelesS. M., pp. 1–17. Cambridge University Press, New York, 2005.
15.
McGlynnE. A.There is no perfect health system. Health Aff. (Millwood)23:100–102, 2004.
16.
PattersonO.Four modes of ethno-somatic stratification: The experience of blacks in Europe and the Americas. In Ethnicity, Social Mobility, and Public Policy: Comparing the US and UK, ed. LouryG. C.ModoodT., and TelesS. M., pp. 67–121. Cambridge University Press, New York, 2005.
17.
MechanicD., and RochefortD. A.Comparative medical systems. Annu. Rev. Sociol.22:239–270, 1996.
18.
SemyonovM.RaijmanR., and GorodzeiskyA.The rise of anti-foreigner sentiment in European societies, 1988–2000. Am. Sociol. Rev.71:426–449, 2006.
19.
ChanT. W., and GoldthorpeJ. H.Is there a status order in contemporary British society? Evidence from the occupational structure of friendship. Eur. Sociol. Rev.20:383–401, 2004.
20.
Institute of Medicine.Coverage Matters: Insurance and Health Care.National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 2001.
21.
DeNavas-WaltC.ProctorB. D., and LeeC. L.Current Population Reports, PP60–229.U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, 2005.
22.
ZillerE. C.Patterns of individual health insurance coverage, 1996–2000. Health Aff. (Millwood)23:210–221, 2004.
23.
Quesnel-ValleeA.Is it really worse to have public health insurance than to have no insurance at all? Health insurance and adult health in the United States. J. Health Soc. Behav.45:376–392, 2004.
24.
ZuvekasS. H., and TaliaferroG. S.Pathways to access: Health insurance, the health care delivery system, and racial/ethnic disparities, 1996–1999. Health Aff. (Millwood)23:139–153, 2003.
25.
LightD. W.Universal health care: Lessons from the British experience. Am. J. Public Health93:25–30, 2003.
26.
LinkB. G., and PhelanJ.Social conditions as fundamental causes of disease. J. Health Soc. Behav., extra issue, 1995, pp. 80–94.
27.
KingD., and MossialosE.The determinants of private medical insurance prevalence in England, 1997–2000. Health Serv. Res.40:195–212, 2005.
28.
PropperC.Constrained choice sets in the U.K. demand for private medical insurance. J. Public Econ.51:287–307, 1993.
29.
BesleyT.HallJ., and PrestonI.The demand for private health insurance: Do waiting lists matter?J. Public Econ.72:155–181, 1999.
30.
DoyleY., and BullA.Role of private sector in United Kingdom healthcare system. BMJ321:563–565, 2000.
31.
RudatK.Black and Ethnic Minority Groups in England: Health and Lifestyles.Health Education Authority, London, 1994.
32.
BealeN.Unequal to the task: Deprivation, health and UK general practice and the millennium. Br. J. Gen. Pract.51:478–485, 2001.
33.
SmithR.The NHS: Possibilities for the endgame. BMJ318:209–210, 1999.
34.
DonaldsonM. S.Primary Care: America's Health in a New Era.National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 1996.
35.
StarfieldB.ShiL., and MacinkoJ.Contribution of primary care to health systems and health. Milbank Q.83:457–502, 2005.
36.
ShiL.Primary care, race, and mortality in the US states. Soc. Sci. Med.61:65–75, 2005.
37.
van DoorslaerE.KoolmanX., and JonesA. M.Explaining income-related inequalities in doctor utilisation in Europe. Health Econ.12:629–647, 2004.
38.
StarfieldB., and ShiL.Policy relevant determinants of health: An international perspective. Health Policy60:201–218, 2002.
39.
CohenR.Frontiers of Identity: The British and the Others.Longman, London, 1994.
40.
BerthoudR.Family formation in multicultural Britain: Diversity and change. In Ethnicity, Social Mobility, and Public Policy, ed. LouryG. C.ModoodT., and TelesS. M., pp. 222–253. Cambridge University Press, New York, 2005.
41.
ModoodT.Diversity and Disadvantage: Ethnic Minorities in Britain.Policy Studies Institute, London, 1997.
42.
CookeL.HalfordS., and LeonardP.Racism in the Medical Profession: The Experience of UK Graduates.British Medical Association, London, 2003.
43.
ZapertK., and PeughJ.Commonwealth Fund International Health Perspectives 2004: A Survey of the Public in 5 Countries—Methodology Report, Study No. 19722.Harris Interactive, New York, 2004.
44.
SchoenC.Health insurance markets and income inequality: Findings from an international health policy survey. Health Policy51:67–85, 2000.
45.
SchnittkerJ.PescosolidoB. A., and CroghanT. W.Are African Americans really less willing to use health care?Soc. Prob.52:255–271, 2005.
46.
KawachiI.DanielsN., and RobinsonD. E.Health disparities by race and class: Why both matter. Health Aff. (Millwood)24:343–352, 2005.
47.
SchulmanK. A.The effect of race and sex on physicians' recommendations for cardiac catheterization. N. Engl. J. Med.340:618–626, 1999.
48.
TelesS. M.MickeyR. W., and AhmedF. S.Regime effects: Ethnicity, social mobility, and public policy in the USA and Britain. In Ethnicity, Social Mobility, and Public Policy, ed. LouryG. C.ModoodT., and TelesS. M., pp. 522–570. Cambridge University Press, New York, 2005.
49.
HastingsA., and RashidA.General practice in deprived areas: Problems and solutions. Br. J. Gen. Pract.43:47–48, 1993.
