The disaster at the Chernobyl power reactor near Kiev, which began on April 26, 1986, was one of the world's worst industrial accidents. Yet the global community, usually most generous in its aid to a stricken community, has been slow to understand the scope of the disaster and reach out to the most devastated people of Ukraine, Belarus, and Russia. This article probes the causes of this confusion of perception and failure of response; clearly the problem is one of communication. Has the International Atomic Energy Agency betrayed the victims of the Chernobyl disaster because of its plans to promote the “peaceful atom” nuclear program in the developing world? Has the World Health Organization failed to provide clear, reliable information on the health effects resulting from the disaster? Are other historical problems or actors interfering with reasonable handling of the late effects of a nuclear disaster? Most importantly, what can be done to remedy this situation, to assist those most hurt by the late effects of Chernobyl and prevent such injustice in future? With the current promotion of nuclear energy as a “solution” to global climate change, we need to take a sober second look at the nuclear energy experiment and management of its hazards.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BertellR. (comp.). Handbook for Estimating the Health Effects from Exposure to Ionizing Radiation, Ed. 2. IICPH, Toronto; MCPH, Buffalo, NY; IRRTI, Birmingham, UK, 1986.
2.
BertellR.Chernobyl: April 1991. Environ. Health Rev.14(fall), 1991.
3.
BertellR.Chernobyl. Environ. Awareness (International Society of Naturalists, India), 16(2):49–55, 1993.
4.
BertellR.Internal bone seeking radionuclides and monocyte counts. Int. Perspect. Public Health9, 1993.
5.
WebsterP.Lessons from Chernobyl. New York Times, June 8, 2003 (Nation, June 23, 2003).
6.
BaverstockK. F.Nature359, September 3, 1992.
7.
BaverstockK. F.WHO Calls for More Aid to Help Child Thyroid Victims.World Health Organization, ECEH, Rome Division, 1995.
8.
Chernobyl Chronicle (Children of Chernobyl Relief and Development Fund Newsletter), 38(spring), 2007.
9.
EisenhowerD.Atoms for Peace. Speech at the United Nations, New York, December 1953.
10.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA95:5426–5431, 1998.
11.
YaroshinskayaA.Chernobyl 20 Years Later: The Crime without Punishment.Vremya, Moscow, 2006.
12.
HaddoeA. (ed.). Biological Hazards of Atomic Energy. Papers from a Conference of the Institute of Biology and the Atomic Scientists Association, London, 1950. Clarendon Press, London, 1952.
13.
BertellR.Avoidable tragedy post Chernobyl. Humanitarian Med.2(3):21–28, 2002.
14.
1990 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. Ann. ICRP21(1–3), 1990. ICRP Publication No. 60.
15.
Committee Membership Information on National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH)Research Programs, p. 484, para. 157.
16.
U.S. National Academy of Science. BEIR III Report, p. 369. Washington, DC, 1980.
17.
NowellP.The clonal evolution of tumor cell populations. Science, October 1976.
18.
MorganW. F.Genome instability and ionizing radiation. Radiat. Res.146: 247–254, 1996.
19.
Radiat. Res.137, 1994.
20.
FordF. B.The influence of radiation on the human genotype? In Biological Hazards of Atomic Energy. Papers from a Conference of the Institute of Biology and the Atomic Scientists Association, London, 1950. Clarendon Press, London, 1952.
21.
New A-bomb studies alter radiation estimates. Science212:900, 1981.
22.
Radiation Effects Research Foundation. U.S. Japan Reassessment of Atomic Bomb Radiation Dosimetry in Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Final Report. June 20, 2006.
23.
Principles for Intervention for Protection of the Public in Radiological Emergencies. Ann. ICRP22(4), 1991. ICRP Publication No. 63.
24.
Chernobyl: Environmental, Health and Human Rights Implications. Transcripts from the Permanent People's Tribunal Hearing, Vienna, April 1996. IPB, Geneva, 1997.
25.
PadmanabhanV. T.Heritable anomalies among the inhabitants of regions of normal and high background radiation in Kerala: Results of a cohort study, 1988–1994. Int. J. Health Serv.34:483–515, 2004.
26.
Busby, C. (ed.). 2003 Recommendations of the European Committee on Radiation Risk, Regulator's Ed., Brussels. Green Audit, Aberystwyth, UK, 2003.
27.
Institute de Radioprotection et de Surite Nucleare. Response to ECRR: Health Consequences of Chronic Internal Contamination by Radionuclides. DRPH/2005–20. Paris, 2005, and NATO Report, August 1992. Submitted to Defense Ministry, Paris, June 29, 2005 (made public in France, July 1, 2005).
28.
BertellR.Depleted uranium: All the questions about DU and Gulf War syndrome are not yet answered. Int. J. Health Serv.36:503–520, 2006.
29.
WHO/IAEA/UNDP. Chernobyl: The True Scale of the Accident. Joint News Release. September 5, 2005.
30.
U.N. Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation. Report to the General Assembly in 2000, Vol. II: Effects, Annex J, p. 484, para. 157. New York, 2000.
31.
International Atomic Energy Agency. From Obninsk Beyond: Nuclear Power Conference Looks to Future. Vienna, 2004.
32.
International Atomic Energy Agency. 50 Years in Nuclear Power: A Retrospective.Solomon Levy, Vienna, 2007.
33.
On This Day: 17 October.BBC News, London, 2006.
34.
CohenB. L.The Nuclear Energy Option.Plenum Press, New York [out of print].
35.
FischerD.History of the International Atomic Energy Agency: The First Forty Years, p. 326. IAEA Fortieth Anniversary Publication. International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, 1997.
36.
Nuclear safety: Impressive and worrisome trends. IAEA Bull.47(2), 1999.
37.
Resolution WHA 12–40, World Health Assembly, 1959.
NussbaumR. H., and KohnlieinW.Inconsistencies and open questions regarding low-dose health effects of ionizing radiation. Environ. Health Perspect.102(8), 1994.
41.
TomonagaM.Late medical effects of atomic bombs still persisting over sixty years. PUGWASH Newsletter42(2):60, 2005.
NussbaumR. H.The linear no-threshold dose-effect: Is it relevant to radiation protection regulations?Med. Phys.25(9):291–299, 1998.
47.
BertellR.Epidemiology in radioactive contaminated areas? In Biomedical and Psychosocial Consequences of Radiation from Man-Made Radionuclides, pp. 303–324. Proceedings of International Symposium, Royal Norwegian Society of Sciences and Letters Foundation, Trondheim, Norway, 1994.
48.
BertellR.Low level radiation exposure effects in the Tri-State leukemia survey. In 100 Years after Roentgen, ed. Schmitz-FeuerhakeI. and LengfelderE., pp. 48–59. Proceedings of the International Congress, Berlin1995. 1997.
