This article draws attention to the Europeanization of social policy and the development of minimum income protection in a large number of welfare democracies. The empirical analyses are based on unique institutional and comparative data on benefit levels from the Social Assistance and Minimum Income Protection Interim Dataset. There is some evidence of convergence in benefit levels among the European countries in the new millennium, but there is no clear proof of universal ambitions to fight poverty or of the existence of a single European social model. There are still welfare front-runners and those who lag behind in this regard, not only among industrial welfare democracies in general but also in Europe.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
StrangeS.Territory, state, authority and economy: A new realist ontology of global political economy. In The New Realism: Perspectives on Multilateralism and World Order, ed. CoxR. W.. Macmillan Press, Basingstoke, UK, 1997.
2.
KitscheltH. (eds.). Continuity and Change in Contemporary Capitalism.Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1999.
3.
BonoliG. (eds.). European Welfare Futures: Towards a Theory of Retrenchment.Polity Press, Cambridge, 2000.
4.
DunningJ.Global Capitalism at Bay?Routledge, London, 2000.
5.
ScharpfF. W., and SchmidtV. A. (eds.). Welfare and Work in the Open Economy, Vol II: Diverse Responses to Common Challenges.Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2000.
6.
PiersonP. (ed.). The New Politics of the Welfare State.Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2001.
7.
Esping-AndersenG.Why We Need a New Welfare State.Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2002.
8.
RiegerE., and LeibfriedS.Limits to Globalization: Welfare States and the World Economy.Polity, Cambridge, 2003.
9.
EbbinghausB.Does a European social model exist and can it survive? In The Role of Employer Associations and Labour Unions in the EMU: Institutional Requirements for European Economic Policies, ed. HuemerG.Ashgate, Aldershot, UK, 1999.
10.
ScharpfF. W.The European social model: Coping with the challenges of diversity. J. Common Market Stud.40(4):645–670, 2002.
11.
MontanariI.Towards a European social model? Trends in social insurance among EU countries 1980–2000. European Societies, 2007, in press.
12.
European Council. Council Recommendation of 24 June 1992 on Common Criteria Concerning Sufficient Resources and Social Assistance in Social Protection. 92/441/EEC. Brussels, 1992.
13.
European Council. Council Recommendation on the Convergence of Social Protection Objectives and Policies. 92/442/EEC. Brussels, 1992.
14.
BorrásS., and JacobssonK.The Open Method of Co-ordination and new governance patterns in the EU. J. Eur. Public Policy11(2):185–208, 2004.
15.
RadaelliC. M.The Open Method of Coordination: A New Governance Architecture for the European Union?Swedish Institute for European Policy Studies, Stockholm, 2003.
16.
WincottD.Beyond social regulation? New instruments and/or a new agenda for social policy at Lisbon?Public Adm.81(3):533–553, 2003.
17.
ZeitlinJ. (eds.). The Open Method of Co-ordination in Action.P.I.E.-Peter Lang S.A, Brussels, 2005.
18.
European Commission. Report on the Implementation of the Recommendation 92/441/EEC of 24 June 1992 on Common Criteria Concerning Sufficient Resources and Social Assistance in Social Protection Systems. Commission Report to the Council, European Parliament, Economic and Social Committee, and Committee of the Regions. COM (98) 774 Final. Brussels, 1998.
19.
ThrelfallM.European social integration: Harmonization, convergence and single social areas. J. Eur. Soc. Policy13(2):130, 2003.
20.
LødemelI., and TrickeyH. (eds.). An Offer You Can't Refuse: Workfare in International Perspective.Policy Press, Bristol, 2000.
21.
MarshallT. H.Citizenship and Social Class and Other Essays.Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1950.
22.
BeveridgeW.Social Insurance and Allied Services.HMSO, London, 1942.
23.
KorpiW.Poverty, social assistance and social policy in postwar Sweden. Acta Sociol.18(2–3):120–141, 1975.
24.
StittS.Poverty and Poor Relief: Concepts and Reality.Avebury, Aldershot, UK, 1994.
25.
GordonM. S.Social Security Policies in Industrial Countries: A Comparative Analysis.Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1988.
26.
FreemanR.Att reformera välfärdsstaten: Ett amerikanskt perspektiv på den svenska modellen. NBER-rapporten 2. SNS Förlag, 2006.
27.
AfonsoA.Public sector efficiency: An international comparison. Public Choice123:321–437, 2003.
28.
SchuknechtL., and TanziV.Public Sector Efficiency: An International Comparison. Working Paper Series No. 242. European Central Bank, Frankfurt, 2003.
29.
SchuknechtL., and TanziV.Reforming Public Expenditure in Industrialised Countries: Are There Trade-offs? Working Paper Series No. 435. European Central Bank, Frankfurt, 2006.
30.
EUROSTAT. The Social Situation in the European Union 2000.European Communities, Luxembourg, 2000.
31.
Esping-AndersenG.The comparison of policy regimes: An introduction. In Stagnation and Renewal in Social Policy, ed. ReinM.M. E. Sharpe, Armonk, NY, 1987.
32.
Esping-AndersenG.The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism.Polity Press, Cambridge, 1990.
33.
ClaytonR., and PontussonJ.Welfare-state retrenchment revisited: Entitlement cuts, public sector restructuring, and inegalitarian trends in advanced capitalist societies. World Politics51:67–98, 1998.
34.
KorpiW., and PalmeJ.The paradox of redistribution and strategies of equality: Welfare state institutions, inequality, and poverty in the western countries. Am. Sociol. Rev.63(5):661–687, 1998.
35.
AdemaW.Net Social Expenditure, Ed. 2. OECD Labour Market and Social Policy Occasional Papers No. 52. OECD, Paris, 2001.
36.
FerrariniT., and NelsonK.Taxation of social insurance and redistribution: A comparative analysis of ten welfare states. J. Eur. Soc. Policy13(1):21–33, 2003.
37.
NelsonK.The Social Assistance and Minimum Income Protection Interim Data-Set: Documentation. Unpublished working paper. Swedish Institute for Social Research, Stockholm University, February 2007.
38.
EardleyT.Social Assistance in OECD Countries: Synthesis Report. Department of Social Security Research Report No. 46. Stationery Office, London, 1996.
39.
KempP. A.A Comparative Study of Housing Allowances. Security Research Report No. 60. Stationery Office, London, 1997.
40.
BradshawJ., and FinchN.A Comparison of Child Benefit Packages in 22 Countries. Department for Work and Pensions Research Report No. 174. Corporate Document Services, Leeds, 2002.
41.
FloraP.Growth to Limits: The Western European Welfare States since World War II, Vol. 4, Appendix: Synopses, Bibliographies, Tables.de Gruyter, Berlin, 1987.
42.
PiersonC.Beyond the Welfare State? The New Political Economy of Welfare.Polity, Cambridge, 1991.
43.
HuberE., and StephensJ. D.Development and Crises of the Welfare State: Parties and Policies in Global Markets.University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 2001.
44.
ThomsonD.Selfish Generations? How Welfare States Grow Old.White Horse Press, Cambridge, 1996.
45.
ScharpfF. W., and SchmidtV. A. (eds.). Welfare and Work in the Open Economy, Vol II: Diverse Responses to Common Challenges.Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2000.
46.
KotlikoffL. J., and BurnsS.The Coming Generational Storm: What You Need to Know about America's Economic Future.MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2005.
47.
KorpiW., and PalmeJ.New politics and class politics in the context of austerity and globalization: Welfare state regress in 18 countries 1975–1995. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev.97(3):1–22, 2003.
48.
MontanariI.Convergence pressures and responses: Recent social insurance development in modern welfare states. Comp. Sociol.6(3):295–323, 2007.
49.
CantillonB.The Evolution of Minimum Income Protection in 15 European Countries 1992–2001. Unpublished working paper, Centrum voor Sociaal Beleid Herman Deleeck, Antwerp, 2004.
50.
ChaponS., and EuzébyC.Towards a convergence of European social models?Int. Soc. Security Rev.55(2):37–56, 2002.
51.
NelsonK.Fighting Poverty: Comparative Studies on Social Insurance, Means-Tested Benefits and Income Redistribution. Dissertation Series No. 60. Swedish Institute for Social Research, Stockholm, 2003.
52.
National Council of Welfare. Another Look at Welfare Reform. Ottawa, 1997.
53.
NelsonK.The last resort: Determinants of the generosity of means-tested minimum income protection policies in welfare democracies. In Welfare Politics Cross-Examined: Eclecticist Analytical Perspectives on Sweden and on the Developed World, ed. CarrollE. and EricssonL.. Aksel Atland Printers, Amsterdam, 2006.
54.
LewisJ.Gender and the development of welfare regimes. J. Eur. Soc. Policy2(3): 159–173, 1992.
55.
HobsonB.Solo mothers, social policy regimes and the logics of gender. In Gendering Welfare States, ed. SainsburyD.. Sage, London, 1994.
56.
SainsburyD.Gender, Equality and Welfare States.Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1996.
57.
RuspiniE.Living on the Poverty Line: Lone Mothers in Belgium, Germany, Great Britain, Italy and Sweden. MZES Working Papers 28. MZES, Mannheim, 1998.
58.
JesuitD.Regional Poverty within the Rich Countries. Luxembourg Income Study Working Paper No. 318. LIS, Luxembourg, 2002.
59.
FörsterM., and Mira d'ErcoleM.Income Distribution and Poverty in OECD Countries in the Second Half of the 1990s. OECD Social Employment and Migration Working Papers No. 22. OECD, Paris, 2005.
60.
BuhmannB.Equivalence scales, well-being, inequality, and poverty: Sensitivity estimates across ten countries using the Luxembourg Income Study (LIS) database. Rev. Income Wealth34(2):115–142, 1988.
61.
SmeedingT.Income distribution in European cities. In Incomes and the Welfare State: Essays on Britain and Europe, ed. AtkinsonA.. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1994.
