Although the passive voice may be overused in legal prose, warnings in legal writing guidebooks against the passive risk undervaluing its many uses. After briefly introducing the passive voice, and some possible reasons for its misuse, this article will outline the many situations when the passive is more appropriate than the active voice.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
StrunkW. and WhiteE. B., The Elements of Style, Macmillan, New York, 1972.
2.
OrwellG., Politics and the English Language, Horizon, 13, 1946.
3.
SvartvikJ., On Voice in the English Verb, Mouton, The Hague, 1966.
4.
HuddlestonR., The Sentence in Written English, Cambridge University Press, London, 1971.
5.
ShintaniM., The Frequency and Usage of the English Passive, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation in Applied Linguistics, UCLA, 1979.
6.
Celce-MurciaM., The Grammar Book, Newbury House, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1983.
7.
BakerS., The Practical Stylist, Harper and Row, New York, 1977.
8.
HackerD., The Bedford Handbook for Writers, St. Martin's Press, Boston, 1992.
9.
MasterP., Active Verbs with Inanimate Subjects in Scientific Prose, English for Specific Purposes, 10:1, Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1991.
10.
SmithR., The Literate Lawyer, Butterworth, New Hampshire, 1991.
11.
GaleF., How to Write the Winning Brief, American Bar Association, Chicago, 1992.
12.
FaulkM., The Elements of Legal Writing, Macmillan, New York, 1994.
13.
WydickR., Plain English for Lawyers, Carolina Academic Press, Durham, 1985.
14.
ArmstrongS., Thinking Like A Writer, Clark, Boardman, Callaghan, New York, 1992.
15.
RayM., Legal Writing: Getting it Right and Getting it Written, West Publishing Co., St. Paul, 1987.
16.
GarnerB., The Elements of Legal Style, Oxford, New York, 1991.
17.
DickersonR., The Fundamentals of Legal Drafting, Little, Brown, Boston, 1986.
GopenG., The State of Legal Writing: Res Ipsa Loquitor, Michigan Law Review, pp. 333, 344, 1987.
20.
LeClerqT., Expert Legal Writing, University of Texas Press, Austin, 1995.
21.
HenleyN. M., Syntax, Semantics, and Sexual Violence: Agency and the Passive Voice, Journal of Language and Social Psychology, March 1995.
22.
WooleverK., Untangling the Law: Verbal Design in Legal Argument, Journal of Advanced Composition, Vol. VI, 1987.
23.
QuirkR., A University Grammar of English, Longman, London, 1974.
24.
ScrivenK., Actively Teaching the Passive Voice, TETYC, p. 90, 1989.
25.
FineganE., Form and Function in Testament Language, in Linguistics and the Professions, Ablex, Norwood, New Jersey, 1982.
26.
TopfM., Communicating Legitimacy in US Supreme Court Opinions, Language and Communication, Pergamon Press, 1992.
27.
HamburgerP. A., The Development of the Nineteenth-Century Consensus Theory of Contract, Law and History Review, 7, pp. 241–329, 1989.
28.
CoxA., The Court and the Constitution, Houghton Mifflin, Boston, 1987.
29.
HuckinT., Prescriptive Linguistics and Plain English: The Case of “Whiz-Deletions,” in Plain Language, Wayne State University Press, Detroit, 1991.
30.
RedishJ. and RosenS., Can Guidelines Help Writers? in Plain Language, Wayne State University Press, Detroit, 1991.
31.
ColemanBrady, Listening to the Law: English Listening Comprehension Exercises from Famous Trials, Historical Decisions, and Leading Legal Experts, University of Michigan Press, 1998.
32.
ColemanBrady, Empathetic Communication, in New Ways in ESP, Master and Brinton (eds.), in press.
33.
ColemanBrady, Teaching Legal English in Korea, ReelJ. (ed.), TESOL Matters, 6:6, January 1997.
34.
ColemanBrady, Undergraduate and Professional Education in the USA (a response), American Studies, 18, p. 92 (American Studies Institute, Seoul National University), 1995.
