This study investigated the effects of teacher discourse in a computer-mediated discussion. Three different styles of discourse were established: questions only; statements only; and conversational. Results supported the hypothesis that a conversational style of discourse produced higher levels of student participation with a more complex interaction pattern. In addition, there was a higher frequency of peer-peer interaction with more complex responses. This study suggests that a conversational style of discourse is both possible and desirable within a computer-mediated discussion. Further research is needed on the effects of a conversational style and newer interface designs on student participation and achievement.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
MehanH., Learning Lessons: Social Organization in the Classroom, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1979.
2.
CazdenC. B., Classroom Discourse: The Language of Teaching and Learning, Heineman Educational Books, Portsmouth, New Hampshire, 1988.
3.
Hertz-LazarowitzR.ShacharH., Teachers' Verbal Behavior in Cooperative and Whole-Class Instruction, in Cooperative Learning, SharanS. (ed.), Praeger, New York, pp. 77–94, 1990.
4.
CazdenC. B., Classroom Discourse, in Handbook of Research on Teaching (3rd Edition), WittrockM. C., (ed.), Macmillan, New York, pp. 432–462, 1986.
5.
JohnsonD. W.JohnsonR. T., Cooperative Learning and Achievement, in Cooperative Learning, SharanS. (ed.), Praeger, New York, pp. 23–37, 1990.
WebbN. M., Student Interaction and Learning in Small Groups, Review of Educational Research, 52, pp. 421–445, 1982.
8.
PhillipsG. M.SantoroG. M., Teaching Group Discussion Via Computer-mediated Communication, Communication Education, 38, pp. 151–161, 1989.
9.
HiltzS. R., Teaching in a Virtual Classroom, A Virtual Classroom on EIES: Final Evaluation Report, Vol. 2 (ERIC Document ED 315 039), 1988.
10.
HarasimL. M., On-line Education: An Environment for Collaboration and Intellectual Amplification, in Online Education: Perspectives on a New Environment, HarasimL. M. (ed.), Praeger, New York, pp. 39–55, 1990.
11.
KraemerK. L.PinsonneaultA., Technology and Groups: Assessment of the Empirical Research, in Intellectual Teamwork: Social and Technological Foundations of Cooperative Work, GalegherJ.KrautR. E.EgidoC. (eds.), Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, New Jersey, pp. 375–405, 1990.
12.
SproullL.KiseslerS., Reducing Social Context Cues: Electronic Mail in Organizational Communication, in Computer-supported Cooperative Work: A Book of Readings, GreifI. (ed.), Morgan Kaufman, San Mateo, California, 1988.
13.
CollinsA.BrownJ. S., The Computer as a Tool for Learning through Reflection, in Learning Issues for Intelligent Tutoring Systems, MandlH.LesgoldA. (eds.), Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 1–18, 1988.
14.
VygoskyL., Thought and Language, KozulinA. (trans.), MIT Press, Cambridge, 1986.
15.
FlorioS.ClarkC. M., What Is Writing For? In a Second-Third-Grade Classroom, in Communicating in the Classroom, L. C. Wilkinson, Academic Press, New York, pp. 265–282, 1982.
16.
MichaelsS., Sharing Time, Language in Society, 10, pp. 423–442, 1981.
17.
McGrathJ. E., Time Matters in Groups, in Intellectual Teamwork: Social and Technological Foundations of Cooperative Work, GalegherJ.KrautR. E.EgidoC. (eds.), Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, New Jersey, pp. 23–61, 1990.
18.
HesseB. W.WernerC. M.AltmanI., Temporal Aspects of Computer-mediated Communication, Computers in Human Behavior, 4, pp. 147–165, 1988.
19.
RogersE. M.KincaidD. L., Communication Networks: Toward a New Paradigm for Research, The Free Press, New York, 1981.
20.
LevinJ. A.KimH.RielM. M., Analyzing Instructional Interactions on Electronic Message Networks, in Online Education: Perspectives on a New Environment, HarasimL. M. (ed.), Praeger, New York, pp. 185–213, 1990.
21.
DillonJ. T., The Effect of Questions in Education and Other Enterprises, Journal of Curriculum Studies, 14:2, pp. 127–152, 1982.
