Theoretical studies in scientific and technical communication have begun to explore what they call discourse communities in the sciences and engineering on grounds that these communities provide the norms and practices for communication in these fields. The theoretical literature on which these studies are based develops two views of what a discourse community might be, an institutional and a social view. The first of these views has been the more influential, but both views may and should be brought to the study and the pedagogy of scientific and technical communication.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
MillerC. R. and SelzerJ., Special Topics of Argument in Engineering Reports, in Writing in Nonacademic Settings, OdellL. and GoswamiD. (eds.), Perspectives in Writing Research, Guilford Press, New York, pp. 309–341, 1985.
2.
ParadisJ.DobrinD., and MillerR., Writing at Exxon ITD: Notes on the Writing Environment of an R&D Organization, in Writing in Nonacademic Settings, OdellL. and GoswamiD. (eds.), Perspectives in Writing Research, Guilford Press, New York, pp. 281–307, 1985.
3.
FreedR. C. and BroadheadG. J., Discourse Communities, Sacred Texts, and Institutional Norms, College Composition and Communication, 38, pp. 154–165, 1987.
4.
SamuelsM. S., Is Technical Communication “Literature”? Current Writing Scholarship and Vico's Cycles of Knowledge, Iowa State Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 1:1, pp. 48–67, 1987.
5.
LipsonC., A Social View of Technical Writing, Iowa State Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 2:1, pp. 7–20, 1988.
6.
MillerC. R., Technology as a Form of Consciousness: A Study of Contemporary Ethos, Central States Speech Journal, 29, pp. 228–236, 1978.
7.
MillerC. R., A Humanistic Rationale for Technical Writing, College English, 40, pp. 610–617, 1979.
8.
BazermanC., What Written Knowledge Does: Three Examples of Academic Discourse, Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 11, pp. 361–387, 1981.
9.
BazermanC., Scientific Writing as a Social Act: A Review of the Literature of the Sociology of Science, in New Essays in Technical and Scientific Communication: Research, Theory, Practice, AndersonP. V.BrockmannC. J., and MillerC. R. (eds.), Baywood's Technical Communications Series, 2, Baywood Publishing Company, Inc., Farmingdale, pp. 156–184, 1983.
10.
DobrinD. N., What's Technical about Technical Writing?, in New Essays in Technical and Scientific Communication: Research, Theory, Practice, AndersonP. V.BrockmannR. J., and MillerC. R. (eds.), Baywood's Technical Communications Series, 2, Baywood Publishing Company, Inc., Farmingdale, pp. 227–250, 1983.
11.
FishS., Is There a Text in This Class? The Authority of Interpretive Communities, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1980.
12.
FishS., Consequences, in Against Theory: Literary Studies and the New Pragmatism, MitchellW. J. T. (ed.), University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 106–131, 1985.
13.
RortyR., Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1979.
14.
RortyR., Pragmatism, Relativism, and Irrationalism, in Consequences of Pragmatism: (Essays: 1972–1980), University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, pp. 160–175, 1982.
15.
BernsteinR. J., Philosophy in the Conversation of Mankind, Review of Metaphysics, 33, pp. 745–775, 1980.
16.
CampbellJ., Rorty's Use of Dewey, Southern Journal of Philosophy, 22, pp. 175–187, 1984.
17.
SleeperR. W., The Necessity of Pragmatism: John Dewey's Conception of Philosophy, Yale University Press, New Haven, 1986.
18.
LyneJ. and HoweH. F., “Punctuated Equilibria”: Rhetorical Dynamics of a Scientific Controversy, Quarterly Journal of Speech, 72, pp. 132–147, 1986.
19.
ZappenJ. P., Rhetoric and Technical Communication: An Argument for Historical and Political Pluralism, Iowa State Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 1:2, pp. 29–44, 1987.
20.
FarrellT. B. and GoodnightG. T., Accidental Rhetoric: The Root Metaphors of Three Mile Island, Communication Monographs, 48, pp. 271–300, 1981.
21.
BoyntonP. E.CrosbyD.EkstromP., and SzumiloA., Search for an Intermediate-Range Composition-Dependent Force, Physical Review Letters, 59, pp. 1385–1389, 1987.
22.
Historical Studies in the Rhetoric of Science and Technology, Technical Writing Teacher, 14, pp. 285–298, 1987.
23.
Rhetoric and Technical Communication: An Argument for Historical and Political Pluralism, Iowa State Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 1:2, pp. 29–44, 1987.
24.
A Rhetoric for Research in Sciences and Technologies, in New Essays in Technical and Scientific Communication: Research, Theory, Practice, AndersonP. V.BrockmannR. J., and MillerC. R. (eds.), Baywood's Technical Communications Series, 2, Baywood Publishing Company, Inc., Farmingdale, pp. 123–138, 1983.
