Computer-based cognitive tools may have an important role to play in making widespread improvements in history teaching. Scholars agree that one important way to help students understand history is to involve them in historical interpretation, and there have been promising developments in the design of tools that scaffold students' interpretation of historical sources. However, some of the researchers themselves have pointed out important limits to this approach. Using participant-observer data from a classroom project aimed at improving students' grasp of “metahistorical” ideas, this article further illuminates the challenge of helping students to understand historical interpretation, and sketches the rough outlines of a library-based system that would augment existing cognitive tools.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AsgariM., & O'NeillD. K. (2005). What do they mean by “success”? Examining mentees' perceptions of success in a curriculum-based telementoring program. In PascarelliJ. & KochanF. (Eds.), Creating successful telementoring programs (pp. 225–249). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
2.
BazermanC. (1988). Shaping written knowledge: The genre and activity of the experimental article in science. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
3.
BrittM. A.PerfettiC. A.Van DykeJ. A., & GabrysG. (2000). The Sourcer's Apprentice: A tool for document-supported history instruction. In StearnsP.SeixasP. & WineburgS. (Eds.), Knowing, teaching and learning history: National and international perspectives (pp. 437–470). New York: New York University Press.
4.
BruckmanA. (1998). Community support for constructionist learning. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 7, 47–86.
5.
BruckmanA.EdwardsE.ElliottJ., & JensenC. (2000). Uneven achievement in a constructionist learning environment. Paper presented at the International Conference of the Learning Sciences, Ann Arbor, MI.
6.
BrushT., & SayeJ. W. (2006, April). Scaffolding critical reasoning in history and social studies: Tools to support problem-based historical inquiry. Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.
7.
CunninghamW., & LeufB. (2001). The Wiki way: Collaboration and sharing on the Internet. Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley.
8.
DeweyJ. (1966). Lectures in the philosophy of education, 1899. New York: Random House.
9.
GabellaM. S. (1994). Beyond the looking glass: Bringing students into the conversation of historical inquiry. Theory and research in social education, 22(3), 340–363.
10.
GadamerH.-G. (1975). Truth and method. WeinsheimerJ. & MarshallD. G. (Trans.). London: Continuum.
11.
GallagherS. (1992). Hermeneutics and education. New York: SUNY.
12.
HarperD. (1987). Working knowledge: Skill and community in a small shop. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
13.
HicksD.DoolittleP., & LeeJ. K. (2004). Social studies teachers' use of classroom-based and web-based historical primary sources. Theory and Research in Social Education, 32(2), 213–247.
14.
LabareeD. F. (1997). Public goods, private goods: The American struggle over educational goals. American Educational Research Journal, 34(1), 39–81.
15.
LajoieS. P., & DerryS. J. (1993). Computers as cognitive tools. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
16.
LamontL. (1993). Cargo cult: Strange stories of desire from Melanesia and beyond. Honolulu, Hawaii: University of Hawaii Press.
17.
LeeP. (2004). Understanding history. In SeixasP. (Ed.), Theorizing historical consciousness. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
18.
LevstikL. S., & BartonK. C. (1997). Doing history: Investigating with children in elementary and middle schools. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
19.
National Center for History in the Schools. (1996). National Standards for History. Los Angeles: National Center for History in the Schools.
20.
O'NeillD. K. (2001). Knowing when you've brought them in: Scientific genre knowledge and communities of practice. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 10(3), 223–264.
21.
O'NeillD. K., & PolmanJ. L. (2004). Why educate “little scientists”? Examining the potential of practice-based scientific literacy. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(3), 234–266.
22.
O'NeillD. K., & SohbatE. (in review). Designing a telementoring program to improve secondary students' understanding of history.
23.
O'NeillD. K.WeilerM. J., & ShaL. (2005). Software support for online mentoring programs: A research-inspired design. Mentoring & Tutoring, 13(1), 109–131.
24.
PeaR. D. (1985). Beyond amplification: Using the computer to reorganize mental functioning. Educational Psychologist, 20(4), 167–182.
25.
PeaR. D. (2004). The social and technological dimensions of scaffolding and related concepts for learning, education and human activity. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(3), 423–451.
26.
PolmanJ. L. (2000). Designing project-based science: Connecting learners through guided inquiry. New York: Teachers College Press.
27.
RavitchD. (2000). The educational backgrounds of history teachers. In StearnsP.SeixasP., & WineburgS. (Eds.), Knowing, teaching and learning history: National and international perspectives. New York: New York University Press.
ResnickL. B. (1987, December). Learning in school and out. Educational Researcher, 16, 13–20.
30.
SayeJ. W., & BrushT. (2002). Scaffolding critical reasoning about History and social issues in multimedia-supported learning environments. Educational Technology Research & Development, 50(3), 77–96.
31.
ScardamaliaM., & BereiterC. (1997). Adaptation and understanding: A case for new cultures of schooling. In VosniadouS.CorteE. D.GlaserR., & MandlH. (Eds.), International perspectives on the psychological foundations of technology-based learning environments. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
SeixasP. (1993). The community of inquiry as a basis for knowledge and learning: The case of history. American Educational Research Journal, 30(2), 305–324.
34.
SeixasP. (1999). Beyond “content” and “pedagogy”: In search of a way to talk about history education. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 31(3), 317–337.
35.
SeixasP. (2001). Historical consciousness in Canada. (Unpublished manuscript).
36.
ShemiltD. (1987). Adolescent Ideas About Evidence and Methodology in History. In PortalC. (Ed.), The History Curriculum for Teachers (pp. 39–61). London, England: The Falmer Press.
37.
Statistics Canada. (2004). Census at school. Retrieved March 31, 2005, from http://www19.statcan.ca/
38.
SuttonC. (1989). Writing and reading in science: The hidden messages. In MillarR. (Ed.), Doing science: Images of science in science education. London: The Falmer Press.
39.
WileyJ., & VossJ. F. (1996). The effects of “playing historian” on the learning of history. Journal of Applied Cognitive Psychology, 10, 563–572.
40.
WineburgS. (1991). On the reading of historical texts: Notes on the breach between school and the academy. American Educational Research Journal, 28(3), 495–519.
