In the present study, it was proposed to investigate the effects of aging on the strategies used to solve a block design task and to establish whether these strategies may be associated with differential patterns of ability. Two groups of subjects, 30 young adults (aged 20–35 years) and 30 middle-aged adults (aged 45–60 years) were set a computer version of the Kohs task and a battery of tests. An age-related decrease in fluid intelligence (Gf) and visual-spatial ability (Gv) was observed, along with the fact that most of the older subjects used a global strategy rather than a synthetic one. On the other hand, while continuing to use strategies of the analytic type, the older subjects looked more frequently at the model and scored high on crystallized intelligence (Gc). These findings are discussed from two different points of view: the theory of hierarchical stimuli and the hypothesis that metacognitive ability, which is thought to rely on Gc, may increase with age, and thus compensate for the loss of Gf and Gv.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AkshoomoffN. A.DelisD. C., & HaistF. (1993). Age-related changes in memory for visual hierarchical stimuli. Developmental-Neuropsychology, 9(3–4), 259–269.
2.
AnderssonE.BergS.LaweniusM., & SvanborgA. (1978). Intellectual functioning in a 70-year-old urban population. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 57, 59–66.
3.
BandG. P.RidderinkhofK. R., & SegalowitzS. (2002). Explaining neurocognitive aging: Is one factor enough?Brain and Cognition, 49(3), 259–267.
4.
Beuscart-ZephirM. C., & BeuscartR. (1988). Tests de Performances; une méthode d'analyse des stratégies de résolution. Un exemple: Le test de cubes du WISC R [Analysis of problem solving strategies: The Kohs block design test]. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 3, 33–51.
5.
CorroyerD., & RouanetH. (1994). Sur l'importance des effets et ses indicateurs dans l'analyse statistique des données [On the importance of effect size and indicators of effect size in the statistical analysis of data]. L'Année Psychologique, 94, 607–624.
6.
CorroyerD.Logiciel pour le traitement statistique des données et son enseignement. APETISD. 68 Avenue de la Faisanderie. 91800 Brunoy. France. apetisd@wanadoo.fr.
7.
FlavellJ. H. (1985). Développement métacognitif. In BideaudJ. & RichelleM. (Eds.), Psychologie développementale: Problèmes et réalités. Bruxelles, Mardaga.
8.
FlavellJ. H. (1987). Speculations about the nature and development of metacognition. In WeinertF. E. & KluweR. H. (Eds.), Metacognition, motivation, and understanding. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
9.
FontaineR. (1999). Manuel de psychologie du vieillissement [Psychology of aging]. Paris: Dunod.
10.
GreenwoodP. M. (2000). The frontal aging hypothesis evaluated. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 6(6), 705–726.
11.
GoldsteinK., & ScheererM. (1951). Abstract and concrete behaviour. A study with special tests. Psychological Monographs, USA. Paris: Édition française des tests au CPA.
12.
GottlobL. R., & MaddenD. J. (1999). Age differences in the strategic allocation of visual attention. Journals of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences And Social Sciences, 54B(3), 165–172.
13.
Gunning-DixonF. M., & RazN. (2003). Neuroanatomical correlates of selected executive functions in middle-aged and older adults: A prospective MRI study. Neuropsychologia, 41(14), 1929–1941.
14.
HasherL., & ZacksR. T. (1988). Working memory, comprehension, and aging: A review and a new view. In BowerG. H. (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 22, pp. 193–224). New York: Academic Press.
15.
HuntE.LunneborgC., & LewisJ. (1975). What does it mean to be high in verbal?Cognitive Psychology, 7, 194–227.
16.
IonescuS.Jourdan-IonescuC., & Toselli-ToschiM. R. (1983). Nouvelles directions dans l'utilisation d'un test d'intelligence (cubes de Kohs). Potentiel d'apprentissage, différences inter-culturelles, organicité cérébrale, activité de l'hémisphère droit, traitement de l'information. Enfance, 4, 363–380.
17.
IsingriniM., & VazouF. (1997). Relation between fluid intelligence and frontal lobe functioning in older adults. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 45(2), 99–109.
18.
JonesR. S., & TorgesenJ. K. (1981). Analysis of behaviours involved in performance of the Block Design Subtest of the WICS-R. Intelligence, 5, 321–328.
19.
KaufmanA. S.ReynoldsC. R., & McLeanJ. E. (1989). Age and WAIS-R intelligence in a national sample of adults in the 20- to 74-year age range: A cross-sectional analysis with educational level controlled. Intelligence, 13(3), 235–253.
20.
KirasicK. C., & AllenG. L. (1985). Aging, spatial performance and spatial competence. In CharnessN. (Ed.), Aging and human performance (pp. 191–223). New York: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
21.
LautreyJ. (1995). L'universel et le différentiel en psychologie [Universal and differential in psychology]. Paris: PUF.
22.
LemaireP., & SieglerR. S. (1995). Four aspects of strategic change: Contributions to children's learning of multiplication. Journal of Experimental Psycholog: General, 124(1), 83–97.
23.
MarquerJ., & PereiraM. (1990). Reaction times in the study of strategies in sentence-picture verification: A reconsideration. Quaterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 42(A), 147–168.
24.
McDowdJ. M. (1997). Inhibition in attention and aging. Journals of Gerontology Series B Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 52(6), 265–273.
25.
MoscovitchM., & WinocurG. (1995). Frontal lobes, memory, and aging. Annals New York Academy of Sciences, 769, 119–150.
26.
NavonD. (1977). Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception. Cognitive Psychology, 9, 353–383.
27.
ReuchlinM. (1978). Processus vicariants et différences individuelles [Vicarious processes and individual differences]. Journal de Psychologie, 2, 133–145.
28.
RobertsonL. C., & LambM. R. (1991). Neuropsychological contributions to theories of part/whole organization. Cognitive-Psychology, 23(2), 299–330.
29.
RouanetH. (1996). Bayesian methods for assessing importance of effects. Psychological Bulletin, 119(1), 149–158.
30.
RouxF., & CeccaldiM. (2001). Does aging affect the allocation of visual attention in global and local information processing?Brain and Cognition, 46, 383–396.
31.
RoyerF. L.GilmoreG. C., & GruhnJ. J. (1984). Stimulus parameters that produce age differences in block design performance. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 40, 1474–1485.
32.
RozencwajgP. (1991). Analysis of problem solving strategies on the Kohs block design test. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 1, 73–88.
33.
RozencwajgP. (2001). Présentation d'un test cognitif informatisé: SAMUEL. In FliellerA.BocéréanC.KopJ. L.ThiébautE.TonioloA. M., & TournoisJ. (Eds.), Questions de psychologie différentielle (pp. 107–111). Rennes: PUR.
RozencwajgP., & CorroyerD. (2002). Strategy development in a block design task. Intelligence, 30(1), 1–25.
36.
RozencwajgP.CorroyerD., & AltmanP. (2001). SAMUEL: Diagnostic du fonctionnement cognitif. Manuel d'instructions. Préface de Michel Huteau [SAMUEL: Diagnosis of cognitive functioning. Manual of the test. Preface of Michel Huteau]. Première édition 1999. Cergy: Delta Expert. Conception et Diffusion de Logiciels pour l'Orientation et l'Education. http://www.delta-expert.com
37.
SalthouseT. A. (1985). Speed of behavior and its implications for cognition. In BirrenJ. E. & SchaieK. W. (Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of aging (pp. 400–426). New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold Company Inc.
38.
SalthouseT. A. (1987). Sources of age-related individual differences in block design tests. Intelligence, 11, 245–262.
39.
SalthouseT. A. (1990). Working memory as a processing resource in cognitive aging. Developmental Review, 10, 101–124.
40.
SalthouseT. A. (1992). Reasoning and spatial abilities. In CraikF. I. M. & SalthouseT. A. (Eds.), The handbook of aging and cognition (pp. 167–211). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
41.
SchorrD.BowerG. H., & KiernanR. (1982). Stimulus variables in the block design task. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 50, 479–487.
42.
ShahP., & MiyakeA. (1996). The separability of working memory resources for spatial thinking and language processing: An individual differences approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 125(1), 4–27.
43.
SternbergR. J. (1988). Applying cognitive theory to the testing and teaching of intelligence. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 2, 231–255.
44.
StoltzfusE. R.HasherL., & ZacksR. T. (1996). Working memory and aging: Current status of the inhibitory view. In RichardsonJ. T. E.EngleR. W.HasherL.LogieR. H.StoltzfusE. R., & ZacksR. T. (Eds.), Working memory and human aging (pp. 66–68). New York: Oxford University Press.
45.
TipperS. P. (1991). Less attentional selectivity as a result of declining inhibition in older adults. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 29, 46–47.
46.
Van der LindenM., & HupetM. (1994). Le vieillissement cognitif [Cognitive aging]. Paris: PUF.
47.
WestR. L. (1996). An application of prefrontal cortex function theory to cognitive aging. Psychological Bulletin, 120(2), 272–292.
