This study focused on the strategies adolescents endorsed for situations in which friends were experimenting with alcohol, tobacco, and other drugs. Four hypothetical vignettes (concerning a friend smoking, using drugs, getting drunk at a party, or deciding whether to attend a party with alcohol and drugs) were presented to 2697 5th-12th graders. Whereas younger students were more likely to choose proactive strategies (talking to the friend or an adult or ending the friendship), older students were more inclined to say they would ignore a friend's smoking and drug use although they would take the car keys away from a friend drinking alcohol. Among those 13 years old and older, the more dangerous the substance, the more inclined the youth were to intervene. Females were more inclined than males to talk to friends about smoking, drinking, and drugs and less inclined to ignore the behaviors or stop being a friend.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
National Youth Anti-Drug Media Campaign, Office of National Drug Control Policy, February 2004. Retrieved May 2004. Available online at: http://www.mediacampaign.org/mg/index.html.
2.
UdryJ. R., The National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health (Add Health), Waves I & II, 1994–1996 (Data Sets 48–50, 98, A1-A3, Kelley, M. S., & Peterson, J. L.) (machine-readable data file and documentation), University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Carolina Population Center, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 1998.
3.
EnnettS. T. and BaumanK. E., The Contribution of Influence and Selection to Adolescent Peer Group Homogeneity: The Case of Adolescent Cigarette Smoking, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, pp. 653–663, 1994.
4.
MaxwellK. A., Friends: The Role of Peer Influence Across Adolescent Risk Behaviors, Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 31:4, pp. 267–277, 2002.
5.
SimpsonH., New to the Road: Reducing the Risks for Young Motorists, UCLA School of Medicine, Youth Enhancement Service, Los Angeles, California, 1996.
6.
ArnettJ. J., Developmental Sources of Crash Risk in Young Drivers, Injury Prevention, 8: Suppl II, pp. ii17–ii23, 2002.
7.
PreusserD. F.FergusonS. A., and WilliamsA. F., The Effect of Teenage Passengers on the Fatal Crash Risk of Teenage Drivers, Accident Analysis Prevention, 30, pp. 217–222, 1998.
8.
SteinbergL., Is Decision Making the Right Framework for Research on Adolescent Risk Taking? in Reducing Adolescent Risk: Toward an Integrated Approach, RomerD. (ed.), Sage, Thousand Oaks, California, pp. 18–24, 2003.
9.
HamburgD. A., Toward a Strategy for Healthy Adolescent Development, The American Journal of Psychiatry, 154:6, pp. 6–13, 1997.
10.
SeiboldD. R. and ThomasR. W., Rethinking the Role of Interpersonal Influence Processes in Alcohol Intervention Situations, Journal of Applied Communication Research, 22, pp. 177–197, 1994.
11.
YounissJ., Parents and Peers in Social Development: A Sullivan-Piaget Perspective, Academic Press, San Diego, California, 1980.
12.
HodgesE. V. E.MaloneM. J., and PerryD. G., Individual Risk and Social Risk as Interacting Determinants of Victimization in the Peer Group, Development Psychology, 33, pp. 1032–1039, 1997.
13.
LaddG. W.KochenderferB. J., and ColemanC. C., Classroom Peer Acceptance, Friendship, and Victimization: Distinct Relational Systems that Contribute Uniquely to Children's School Adjustment, Child Development, 68, pp. 1181–1197, 1997.
14.
BuhrmesterD., Need Fulfillment, Interpersonal Competence, and the Developmental Contexts of Early Adolescent Friendship, in The Company They Keep: Friendship in Childhood and Adolescence, BukowskiW. M.NewcombA. F., and HartupW. W. (eds.), Cambridge University Press, New York, pp. 158–185, 1996.
15.
NewcombA. F. and BagwellC. L., Children's Friendship Relations: A Meta-Analytic Review, Psychological Bulletin, 117:2, pp. 306–347, 1995.
16.
ParkerJ. G. and AsherS. R., Friendship and Friendship Quality in Middle Childhood: Links with Peer Group Acceptance and Feelings of Loneliness and Social Dissatisfaction, Developmental Psychology, 29, pp. 611–621, 1993.
17.
CamarenaP. M.SarigianiP. A., and PetersonA. C., Gender-Specific Pathways to Intimacy in Adolescence, Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 19, pp. 19–32, 1990.
18.
WilliamsC. and BybeeJ., What Do Children Feel Guilty About? Developmental and Gender Differences, Developmental Psychology, 30:5, pp. 617–623, 1994.
19.
AsherS. R.ParkerJ. G., and WalkerD. L., Distinguishing Friendship from Acceptance: Implications for Intervention and Assessment, in The Company They Keep: Friendship in Childhood and Adolescence, BukowskiW. M.NewcombA. F., and HartupW. W. (eds.), Cambridge University PressNew York, pp. 366–405, 1996.
20.
RoseA. J. and AsherS. R., Children's Strategies and Goals in Response to Help-Giving and Help-Seeking Tasks Within a Friendship, Child Development, 75:3, pp. 749–763, 2004.
21.
RoseA. J. and AsherS. R., Children's Goals and Strategies in Response to Conflicts Within a Friendship, Developmental Psychology, 35, pp. 69–79, 1999.
22.
BuhrmesterD. and PragerK., Patterns and Functions of Self-Disclosure During Childhood and Adolescence, in Disclosure Processes in Children and Adolescents, RotenbergK. J. (ed.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, pp. 10–56, 1995.
23.
MaccobyE. E., Gender and Relationships: A Developmental Account, American Psychologist, 45, pp. 513–520, 1990.
24.
RoseA. J., Co-Rumination in the Friendships of Girls and Boys, Child Development, 73:6, pp. 1830–1843, 2002.
25.
EisenbergN., Moral Cognitions and Prosocial Responding in Adolescence, in Handbook of Adolescent Psychology (2nd Edition), LernerR. M. and SteinbergL. (eds.), John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, New Jersey, 2004.
26.
RuckM. D.AbramovitchR., and KeatingD. P., Children's and Adolescents' Understanding of Rights: Balancing Nurturance and Self-Determination, Child Development, 64, pp. 404–417, 1998.
27.
RuckM. D.Peterson-BadaliM., and DayD. M., Adolescents' and mothers' understanding of rights in the home, Journal of Research on Adolescence, 12:3, pp. 373–398, 2002.
28.
HelwigC. C., Adolescents' and Young Adults' Conceptions of Civil Liberties: Freedom of Speech and Religion, Child Development, 66, pp. 152–166, 1995.
29.
BerkowitzM. W.GuerraN., and NucciL., Sociomoral Development and Drug and Alcohol Abuse, in Handbook of Moral Behavior and Development, Vol. 3: Application, KurtinesW. M. and GewirtzJ. L. (eds.), Erlbaum, Hillsdale, New Jersey, pp. 35–53, 1991.
30.
KillenM.LevitonM., and CahillJ., Adolescent Reasoning About Drug Use, Journal of Adolescent Research, 6, pp. 336–356, 1991.
31.
NucciL.GuerraN., and LeeJ., Adolescent Judgments of the Personal, Prudential, and Normative Aspects of Drug Usage, Developmental Psychology, 27, pp. 841–848, 1991.
32.
CauffmanE.SteinbergL., and WoolardJ., Age Differences in Psychosocial Capacities Underlying Competence to Stand Trial, paper presented at the biennial meetings of the Society for Research on Adolescence, New Orleans, Louisiana, April 2002.
33.
SchaferJ. L., Analysis of Incomplete Multivariate Data, Chapman and Hall, New York, 1997.
34.
RubinD. B., Multiple Imputation for Nonresponse in Surveys, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1987.
35.
YounissJ. and SmollarJ., Adolescents' Relationships with Mothers, Fathers, and Friends, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1985.
36.
PerkinsH. W., The Emergence and Evolution of the Social Norms Approach to Substance Abuse Prevention, in The Social Norms Approach to Preventing School and College Age Substance Abuse: A Handbook for Educators, Counselors, and Clinicians,PerkinsH. W. (ed.), Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, pp. 3–17, 2003.
37.
RabowJ.HernandezA. C. R., and WattsR. K., College Students Do Intervene in Drunk Driving Situations, Sociology and Social Research, 70, pp. 224–225, 1986.
38.
ArnettJ. J., Conceptions of the Transition to Adulthood Among Emerging Adults in American Ethnic Groups, in Cultural Conceptions of the Transition to Adulthood. New Directions in Child and Adolescent Development, ArnettJ. J. and GalambosN. (eds.), Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, California, 2003.
