Over the past 20 years or so, India, China, and the rest of East Asia experienced fast economic growth and falls in the poverty rate, Latin America stagnated, and the former Soviet Union, Central and Eastern Europe, and sub-Saharan Africa regressed. But what are the net trends? The neoliberal argument says that world poverty and income inequality fell over the past two decades for the first time in more than a century and a half, thanks to the rising density of economic integration across national borders. The evidence therefore confirms that globalization in the context of the world economic regime in place since the end of Bretton Woods generates more “mutual benefit” than “conflicting interests.” This article questions the empirical basis of the neoliberal argument.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
World Bank.World Development Indicators 2002. Washington D.C., 2002.
2.
DollarD., and KraayA.Spreading the wealth. Foreign Affairs, January/February 2002, pp. 120–133.
3.
WolfM.Doing more harm than good. Financial Times, May 8, 2002.
4.
MazurJ., Labor's new internationalism. Foreign Affairs79(1): 79–93, 2000.
5.
GowanP.The Global Gamble. Verso, London, 1999.
6.
WolfM.The big lie of global inequality. Financial Times, February 8, 2000.
7.
International Monetary Fund.World Economic Outlook. Database. Washington, D.C., April 2003.
8.
ArrighiG.SilverB., and BrewerB., Industrial convergence, globalization and the persistence of the North-South divide. Stud. Comp. Int. Dev.38(1): 3–31, 2003.
9.
World Bank.Global Economic Prospects and the Developing Countries 2002: Making Trade Work for the World's Poor. Washington, D.C., 2002.
10.
WolfensohnJ.Responding to the Challenges of Globalization: Remarks to the G-20 Finance Ministers and Central Governors. Ottawa, November 17, 2001.
11.
World Bank.World Development Indicators 2001. Washington, D.C., 2001.
12.
World Bank.Globalization, Growth, and Poverty: Building an Inclusive World Economy. World Bank and Oxford University Press, New York, 2002.
DeatonA., Counting the world's poor: Problems and possible solutions. World Bank Research Observer16(2): 125–147, 2001.
18.
World Bank.World Development Report 2000/2001: Attacking Poverty. Washington, D.C., 2001.
19.
PoggeT., and ReddyS.Unknown: The Extent, Distribution, and Trend of Global Income Poverty. 2003. www.socialanalysis.org.
20.
Economic Commission for Latin America.Panorama Social de America Latina 2000–01. Santiago, 2001.
21.
GopinathD.Poor choices. Institutional Investor, 2002, pp. 41–50.
22.
WadeR. H., US hegemony and the World Bank: The fight over people and ideas. Rev. Int. Polit. Econ.9(2): 201–229, 2002.
23.
Meltzer Commission (U.S. Congressional Advisory Commission on International Financial Institutions.Report to the U.S. Congress on the International Financial Institutions. 2002. www.house/gov/jec/imf/ifiac
24.
MeltzerA.The World Bank one year after the Commission's report to Congress. Hearings before the Joint Economic Committee, U.S. Congress, March 8, 2001.
WolfM.Growth makes the poor richer: Reversing the effects of globalization might increase equality as the critics claim, but it would be an equality of destitution. Financial Times, January 24, 2001.
27.
WolfM.A stepping stone from poverty. Financial Times, December 19, 2001.
28.
GiddensA.Where Now for New Labour?Polity Press, Cambridge, 2002.
29.
CastlesI.Letter. Economist, May 26, 2001.
30.
FirebaughG., Empirics of world income inequality. Am. J. Sociol.104(6): 1597–1630, 1999.
31.
JonesC., On the evolution of world income distribution. J. Econ. Perspect.11(3): 19–36, 1997.
32.
PritchettL., Divergence: Big time. J. Econ. Perspect.11(3): 3–17, 1997.
33.
QuahD., Empirics for growth and distribution: Stratification, polarization, and convergence clubs. J. Econ. Growth.2(1): 27–57, 1997.
34.
United Nations Development Program.Human Development Report 1999. United Nations, New York, 1999.
35.
KanburR.Conceptual Challenges in Poverty and Inequality: One Development Economist's Perspective. WP2002–09. Department of Applied Economics, Cornell University, 2002.
36.
KorzeniewiczR., and MoranT., World-economic trends in the distribution of income, 1965–1992. Am. J. Sociol.102(4): 1000–1039, 1997.
37.
KorzeniewiczR., and MoranT., Measuring world income inequalities. Am. J. Sociol.106(1): 209–214, 2000.
38.
DikhanovY., and WardM.Evolution of the global distribution of income in 1970–99. In Proceedings of the Global Poverty Workshop. Initiative for Policy Dialogue, Columbia University, 2003. www-l.gsb.Columbia.edu/ipd/povertywk.html.
39.
MilanovicB.Can We Discern the Effect of Globalization on Income Distribution?Evidence from Household Budget Surveys. World Bank Policy Research Working Papers 2876. 2002. http://econ.worldbank.org.
40.
Economic Commission for Latin America.Globalization and Development. Santiago, 2002.
41.
WolfM.Are global poverty and inequality getting worse? Yes: Robert Wade, No: Martin Wolf. Prospect, March 2002, pp. 16–21.
MilanovicB.The Ricardian Vice: Why Sala-i-Matin's Calculations Are Wrong. Typescript Development Research Group, World Bank, 2002. www.ssrn.com.
46.
NyeH., and ReddyS.Weaknesses of Recent Global Poverty Estimates: Xavier Sala-i-Martin and Surjit Bhalla. 2003. www.socialanalysis.org.
47.
GalbraithJ. K.A perfect crime: Inequality in the age of globalization. Daedalus, Winter 2002, pp. 11–25.
48.
KyngeJ.Pyramid of power behind numbers game. Financial Times, February 27, 2002.
49.
RawskiT.Measuring China's Recent GDP Growth: Where Do We Stand?2002. www.pitt.edu/∼tgrawski.
50.
WaldronA.China's disguised failure: Statistics can no longer hide the need for Beijing to instigate painful structural reforms. Financial Times, July 4, 2002.
51.
World Bank.World Development Indicators 1999. Washington, D.C., 1999.
52.
World Bank.World Development Indicators 2000. Washington, D.C., 2000.
53.
HommannK., and BrandonC.The Cost of Inaction: Valuing the Economy-wide Cost of Environmental Degradation in India. Paper presented at Modelling Global Sustainability Conference, United Nations University, Tokyo, 1995.
KrugmanP.For richer. New York Times, October 20, 2002.
56.
BabonesS.The Structure of the World-Economy, 1960–1999. Paper presented at 97th Annual Meeting of the American Sociological Association, Chicago, 2002.
57.
RodrikD.The New Global Economy and Developing Countries: Making Openness Work. Policy Essay 24, Overseas Development Council. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, 1999.
58.
RodrikD., Trading in illusions. Foreign Policy123(March/April): 55–62, 2001.
59.
BesleyT.Globalization and the Quality of Government. Manuscript. Economics Department, London School of Economics, March 2002.
60.
WadeR. H.Governing the Market. Princeton University Press, Princeton, 2003 [1990].
61.
GeorgeS., How to win the war of ideas: Lessons from the Gramscian right. Dissent44(3): 47–53, 1997.
62.
BesleyT., and BurgessR., Halving world poverty. J. Econ. Perspect.17(3): 3–22, 2003.
63.
LeeM. R., and BankstonW., Political structure, economic inequality, and homicide: A cross-sectional analysis. Deviant Behavior: An Interdisciplinary Journal19: 27–55, 1999.
64.
HsiehC. C., and PughM., Poverty, income inequality, and violent crime: A meta-analysis of recent aggregate data studies. Criminal Justice Rev. 18: 182–202, 1993.
65.
FajnzylberP.LedermanD., and LoayzaN.What Causes Violent Crime? Typescript. Office of the Chief Economist, Latin America and the Caribbean Region, World Bank, Washington, D.C., 1998.
66.
FreemanR., Why do so many young American men commit crimes and what might we do about it?J. Econ. Perspect.10(1): 25–42, 1996.
67.
DemenyP., Population policy dilemmas in Europe at the dawn of the twenty-first century. Popul. Dev. Rev.29(1): 1–28, 2003.
68.
WadeR. H., The invisible hand of the American empire. Ethics Int. Aff.17(2): 77–88, 2003.
69.
WadeR. H., What strategies are viable for developing countries today? The WTO and the shrinking of development space. Rev. Int. Polit. Econ.10(4): 621–644, 2003.
70.
KapurD.The changing anatomy of governance of the World Bank. In Reinventing the World Bank, ed. PincusJ. and WintersJ.. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, N.Y., 2002.
71.
U.N. Development Program.Making Global Trade Work for People. Earthscan, London, 2003.
72.
WadeR. H.The World Bank and its critics: The dynamics of hypocrisy. Stud. Comp. Int. Dev., forthcoming.
73.
GopinathD.Slouching toward a new consensus. Institutional Investor, September 1, 1999, pp. 79–87.
74.
WadeR. H.Globalisation, poverty and income distribution: Does the liberal argument hold? In Globalization, Living Standards and Inequality: Recent Progress and Continuing Challenges, pp. 37–65. Reserve Bank of Australia, Sydney, 2002.
75.
WadeR. H.World poverty and inequality: Why they are probably rising, and the North-South divide persisting. New Polit. Econ., 2004, in press.
