The way a person defines a term could have a significant effect on his behavior. In this article, the writer probes the behavioral pitfalls of defining communication as the “transmission” of information, and offers an alternative definition that may enhance communication effectiveness.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
FeeringFranklin, “Human Communication,” in DexterL. A.WhiteD. M., People, Society, and Mass Communication, eds., p. 42, The Free Press of Glencoe, New York, 1964.
2.
SchrammW.RobertsD. F. eds., The Process and Effects of Mass Communication, rev. ed., p. 8, University of Illinois Press, Urbana, Ill., 1971.
3.
CartierF. A.HarwoodK. A., “On Definition of Communication,”Journal of Communication, Vol. 3, p. 72, 1953.
4.
BirdwhistellRay L., “Communication,”International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, Vol. 3, p. 24, The Macmillan Company and the Free Press, New York, 1968.
5.
DeFleurMelvin L., Theories of Mass Communication, p. 91, David McKay Company, New York, 1966.
6.
WhorfBenjamin L., “Science and Linguistics,” in MaccobyE. E.NewcombT. M.HartleyE. L., Readings in Social Psychology, p. 5, 3rd ed., Henry Holt and Company, New York, 1958.
7.
BerloDavid K., The Process of Communication: An Introduction to Theory and Practice, p. 272, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York, 1960.
8.
NewcombT. M., Social Psychology, p. 3, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York, 1965.
9.
MeerlooJ. A. M., “Contributions of Psychiatry to the Study of Human Communication,” in DanceFrank E., ed., Human Communication Theory, p. 132, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York, 1967.
10.
TagiuriR.PetrulloL. eds., Person Perception and Interpersonal Behavior, p. 154, Standord University Press, Stanford, California, 1958.
11.
Langer distinguishes between signs and symbols in terms of their relationships with their referents and their effect on the user. Thus, the sign represents a subject-sign-object relationship; the symbol represents a subject-symbol-conception-object relationship. Also, whereas the sign (such as fire or rain) evokes action from its user, the symbol (such as Kennedy or Stalin) evokes conceptions or images of its referent See LangerSusan K., Philosophy in a New Key: A Study in the Symbolism of Reason, Rite, and Art, p. 58, 11th Printing, Mentor Books, New York, 1961.
12.
MeadGeorge H., Mind, Self, and Society, p. 71, 17th Impression, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1970.
