In order to discover general laws in the appreciation of artworks, an explanation of the mere-exposure hypothesis is extended to features which are typical of artworks. Artistic style—the way things are depicted—is discussed as a possible dimension along which increasing familiarity reveals changes in the preference structure. Empirical data from studies in which familiarity and style were varied seem to support the main hypothesis, but also reveal specific limitations. Generally, the pictorial fluency of an artificial style affected appreciation more than familiarity with a given style.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BerlyneD. E., (Ed.) (1974). Studies in the new experimental aesthetics.New York: John Wiley and Sons.
2.
BornsteinR. F. (1989). Exposure and affect: Overview and meta-analysis of research, 1968-1987. Psychological Bulletin, 106(2), 265–289.
3.
BornsteinR. F., & D'AgostinoP. R. (1994). The attribution and discounting of perceptual fluency: Preliminary tests of a perceptual fluency/attributional model of the mere exposure effect. Social Cognition, 12, 103–128.
4.
CupchikG. C. (1974). An experimental investigation of perceptual and stylistic dimensions of paintings suggested by art history. In BerlyneD. E. (Ed.), Studies in the new experimental aesthetics.Washington, DC: Hemisphere.
5.
FechnerG. T. (1871). Vorschule der Ästhetik.Hildesheim: Olms.
6.
HekkertP., & van WieringenP. C. V. (1996). Beauty in the eyes of experts and non-expert beholders: A study in the appraisal of art. American Journal of Psychology, 109, 389–407.
7.
LederH. (1992). Color in picture recognition of abstract and representational artworks. Proceedings of the XI IAEA-Congress, Berlin.
8.
LederH. (2001). Determinants of preference. When do we like what we know?Empirical Studies of the Arts, 19, 201–211.
9.
LederH. (2002). Explorationen in der Bildästhetik.Lengerich: Pabst Publisher.
10.
LederH., & BruceV. (2000). When inverted faces are recognised: The role of configural information in face recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53A, 513–536.
11.
RaabE. (1976). Bildkomplexität, Farbe und ästhetischer Eindruck.Graz: Akademische Druckanstalt.
12.
ReberR.WinkielmanP., & SchwarzN. (1998). Effects of perceptual fluency on affective judgments. Psychological Science, 9, 45–48.
13.
SeamonJ. G.Ganor-SternD.CrowleyM. J.WilsonS. M.WeberW. J.O'RourkeC. M., & MahoneyJ. K. (1997). A mere exposure effect for transformed three-dimensional objects: Effects of reflection, size, or color changes on affect and recognition. Memory and Cognition, 25, 367–374.
14.
ZajoncR. B. (1968). Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology Monograph Supplements, 9(2, Pt. 2), 1–27.
