A typology of suicide expressions gathered from official case records demonstrates the varied reasons individuals document to justify their acts of self-destruction. Intended to highlight the psychosocial conditions affecting the writer, the statements suggest these youthful committers reacted to external constraints and a perceived lack of succorance from significant others.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
LesterD., Toward a Theory of Parasuicide, Corrective and Social Psychiatry and Journal of Behavior Technology Methods and Therapy, 34, pp. 24–26, 1988.
2.
DouglasJ., The Social Meaning of Suicide, Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, 1967.
3.
U.S. Bureau of the Census, Statistical Abstract of the United States: 1987, (107th Edition), Washington, D.C., 1986.
4.
EriksonE. H., Childhood and Society, W. W. Norton and Company, New York, 1950.
5.
PeckD. L., Post-Traumatic Stress and Life-Destructive Behavior, The Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare, 11, pp. 876–893, 1984.
6.
BernsteinM., The Communication of Suicidal Intent by Completed Suicides, Omega: Journal of Death and Dying, 9, pp. 175–182, 1979.
7.
JacobsJ., A Phenomenological Study of Suicide Notes, Social Problems, 15, pp. 60–72, 1967.
8.
PeckD. L., The Last Moments of Life: Learning to Cope, Deviant Behavior: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 4, pp. 313–332, 1983.
9.
ShneidmanE. S. and FarberowN. L., A Sociopsychological Investigation of Suicide, in Perspectives in Personality Research, DavidJ. P. and BrengelmanJ. C. (eds.), Springer Publishing Company, New York, pp. 270–292, 1968.
10.
HenryA. F. and ShortJ. F.Jr., Suicide and Homicide, The Free Press, New York, 1954.
11.
DurkheimE., Suicide, The Free Press, New York, (1897) 1951.
12.
KowalskiG. S.FaupelC. E., and StarP. D., Urbanism and Suicide: A Study of American Counties, Social Forces, 66, pp. 85–101, 1987.