Advice about how and when to implement the you-perspective is sometimes vague or contradictory. Many authorities simply advise writers to use the second person pronoun as often as possible, in either subject or object position; others suggest that the first person pronoun may be preferable for certain types of messages such as negative ones. Concepts from speech act theory can be used to clarify the most effective use of first and second person pronouns in two types of structures frequently found in professional communication: commissives and directives.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
LesikarR. V., Basic Business Communication, Richard D. Irwin, Homewood, Illinois, 1979.
2.
HusemanR. C.LahiffJ. M., and PenroseJ. M.Jr., Business Communication: Strategies and Skills, 3rd Edition, Dryden Press, Chicago, 1988.
3.
SigbandN. B. and BellA. H., Communication for Management and Business, 4th Edition, Scott, Foresman, Glenview, Illinois, 1986.
4.
WilkinsonC. W.WilkinsonD. C., and VikG. N., Communication Through Writing and Speaking, 9th Edition, Richard D. Irwin, Homewood, Illinois, 1986.
5.
DumontR. A. and LannonJ. M., Business Communication, 2nd Edition, Little, Brown, Boston, 1987.
6.
BonnerW. H., Communicating in Business: Key to Success, 4th Edition, Dame Publications, Houston, 1986.
7.
BowmanJ. P. and BranshawB. P., Successful Communication in Business, Harper and Row, San Francisco, 1980.
8.
MurphyH. A. and HildebrandtH. W., Effective Business Communications, 5th Edition, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1988.
9.
HimstreetW. C. and BatyW. M., Business Communications: Principles and Methods, 7th Edition, Wadsworth, Boston, 1984.
10.
AustinJ. L., How to Do Things with Words, Clarendon, Oxford, 1962.
11.
SearleJ. R., Speech Acts, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1969.
12.
SearleJ. R., Indirect Speech Acts, in Syntax and Semantics 3: Speech Acts, ColeP. and MorganJ. L. (eds.), Academic Press, New York, pp. 59–82, 1975.
13.
FillmoreC., The Case for Case, in Universals in Linguistic Theory, BachE. and HarmsR. (eds.), Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York, pp. 1–90, 1968.
14.
KeenanE., Towards a Universal Definition of “Subject,” in Subject and Topic, LiC. (ed.), Academic Press, New York, pp. 303–333, 1976.
15.
CampbellK. S., Review of C. Meyer, A Linguistic Analysis of American Punctuation, College Composition and Communication, May 1989.
16.
CampbellK. S., Explanations in Negative Messages: More Insights from Speech Act Theory, Journal of Business Communication, forthcoming.
17.
RileyK. and ParkerF.Tone as a Function of Presupposition in Tecnical and Business Writing, Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 18, pp. 433–451, 1988.
18.
RileyK.Conversational Implicature and Unstated Meaning in Professional Communication, Technical Writing Teacher, 15, pp. 94–105, 1988.
19.
RileyK.Speech Act Theory and Degrees of Directness in Professional Writing, Technical Writing Teacher, 15, pp. 1–29, 1988.
20.
ParkerF., Linguistics for Non-Linguists, Little, Brown, Boston, 1986.
