Decentralization is a highly popular concept, being a key element of Primary Health Care policies. There are, however, certain negative implications of decentralization that must be taken into account. These are analyzed in this article with particular reference to developing countries. The authors criticize the tendency for decentralization to be associated with state limitations, and discuss the dilemma of relating decentralization, which is the enhancement of the different, to equity, which is the promotion of equivalence. Those situations in which decentralization can strengthen political domination are described. The authors conclude by setting out a checklist of warning questions and issues to be taken into account to ensure that decentralization genuinely facilitates the Primary Health Care orientation of health policy.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
de KadtE.Better health than health care: Moving up, down and out. Bull. Inst. Dev. Stud. Sussex14: 10–16, 1983.
2.
SegallM.Planning and politics of resource allocation for primary health care: Promotion of meaningful national policy. Soc. Sci. Med.17: 1947–1960, 1983.
3.
VaughanP.MillsA.SmithD.The importance of decentralized management. World Health Forum5: 27–29, 1984.
4.
SmithB. C.Bureaucracy and Political Power, pp. 213–214. Wheatsheaf Books, Brighton, 1988.
5.
DunleavyP.O'LearyB.Theories of the State: The Politics of Liberal Democracy. Macmillan, London, 1987.
6.
World Bank. World Development Report. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1983.
7.
LeonardD. K.MarshallD. R. (eds.). Institutions of Rural Development for the Poor. Decentralisation and Organisational Linkages. Institute of International Studies, University of California, Berkeley, 1982.
8.
TomicB.GonzalezR.Municipia y Estado: Dimensiones de una Relacion Clave. Monografia sobre empleo/27, PREALC/ISS S 831. Organizatión International del Trabajo, Santiago, 1983.
9.
CheemaG. S.RondinelliD. A. (eds.). Decentralisation and Development. Sage, Beverly Hills, Calif., 1983.
10.
SmithB. C.Decentralisation. The Territorial Dimension of the State. George Allen & Unwin, London, 1985.
11.
CollinsC. D.Decentralisation and the need for political and critical analysis. Health Policy Planning4: 168–171, 1989.
12.
LeonardD. K.Analyzing the organizational requirements for serving the rural poor. In Institutions of Rural Development for the Poor: Decentralisation and Organizational Linkages, edited by LeonardD. K.MarshalD. R. p. 34. Institute of International Studies, University of California, Berkeley, 1982.
13.
Secretaries of State of Health, Wales, Northern Ireland and Scotland. Working for Patients. Her Majesty's Stationery Office, London, 1989.
14.
HarrisonS.Competing for Health: A Commentary on the NHS Review. Nuffield Institute for Health Services Studies, Leeds, March 1989.
15.
ConyersD.Decentralization: The latest fashion in development administration. Public Administr. 3: 97–109.
16.
MathurK.Administrative decentralization in Asia. In Decentralisation and Development, edited by CheemaG. S.RondinelliD. A., pp. 59–76. Sage, Beverly Hills, Calif., 1983.
17.
NellisJ. R.Decentralization in North Africa: Problems of policy implementation. In Decentralisation and Development, edited by CheemaG. S.RondinelliD. A., pp. 127–182. Sage, Beverly Hills, Calif., 1983.
18.
RondinelliD. A.Decentralization of development administration in East Africa. In Decentralisation and Development, edited by CheemaG. S.RondinelliD. A., pp. 77–126. Sage, Beverly Hills, Calif., 1983.
19.
HarrisR. L.Centralization and decentralization in Latin America. In Decentralisation and Development, edited by CheemaG. S.RondinelliD. A., pp. 183–202. Sage, Beverly Hills, Calif., 1983.
20.
FriedlandR.Political conflict, urban structure and the fiscal crisic. Int. J. Urban Regional Res. 1: 446–471, 1977.
21.
WestP. A.Theoretical and practical equity in the National Health Service in England. Soc. Sci. Med.15C: 117–122, 1981.
22.
World Bank. Financing Health Services in Developing Countries: An Agenda for Reform. Washington, D.C., 1987.
23.
Perez-DiazD. M.State, Bureaucracy and Civil Society: A Critical Examination of the Political Theory of Karl Marx. Macmillan, New York, 1978.
24.
OffeC.Structural problems of the capitalist state. In German Political Studies, Vol. 1, edited by von BeymeK., pp. 31–57. Sage, London and Beverly Hills, 1974.
25.
TherbornG.What Does the Ruling Class Do When It Rules? State Apparatuses and State Power under Feudalism, Capitalism and Socialism. New Left Books, London, 1978.
26.
AlfordR. R.FriedmanR.Political participation and public policy. Annu. Rev. Sociol.1, 1975.
27.
BermanB.Structure and process in the bureaucratic states of colonial Africa. Dev. Change15: 161–202, 1984.
28.
CollinsC. D.Local Government and Its Reforms in Colombia between 1974 and 1986. Ph.D. Thesis, Institute of Local Government Studies, University of Birmingham, 1987.
29.
KleinR.The Politics of the National Health Service. Longman, Harlow, United Kingdom, 1983.
30.
FurnissN.The practical significance of decentralisation. J. Polit.36(4): 958–982, 1974.
