This study, based on in-depth qualitative interviews with three Caucasian widows and four African-American widows, describes and compares the women's selection of coping strategies to deal with problems occurring after the death of their husbands. Results of this investigation suggest more similarities than differences in coping strategies adopted to deal with loneliness, difficulties with children, health issues, loss of task support, and the use of social support networks as a coping mechanism. Although the husbands' death was devastating, personal growth experiences were positive results of the loss. This study also suggests implications for professionals working with both Black and white widows.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
DiGiulioJ. F., Early Widowhood: An Atypical Transition, Journal of Mental Health Counseling, 14:1, pp. 97–109, 1992.
2.
AvisN. E.BrambillaD. J.VassK., and McKinlayJ. B., The Effect of Widowhood on Health: A Prospective Analysis from the Massachusetts Women's Health Study, Social Science and Medicine, 33:9, pp. 1063–1070, 1991.
3.
JohnsonK. A. and JennisonK. M., Stressful Loss and the Buffering Effect of Social Support on Drinking Behavior among African-Americans: Results of a National Survey, Journal of Alcohol and Drug Education, 39:2, pp. 1–24, 1994.
4.
KitsonG. C.BabriK. B.RoachM. J., and PlacidiK. S., Adjustment to Widowhood and Divorce, Journal of Family Issues, 10:1, pp. 5–32, 1989.
5.
LopataH. Z., Widowhood in An American City, Schenkman Publishing Company, Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1973.
6.
IrishD. P., Multiculturalism and the Majority Population, in Ethnic Variations in Dying, Death, and Grief: Diversity in Universality, IrishD. P.LundquistK. F., and NelsenV. J. (eds.), Taylor & Francis, Washington, D.C., 1993.
7.
PerryH. P., Mourning and Funeral Customs of African Americans, in Ethnic Variations in Dying, Death, and Grief: Diversity in Universality, IrishD. P.LundquistK. F., and NelsenV. J. (eds.), Taylor & Francis, Washington, D.C., 1993.
8.
AttigT., The Importance of Conceiving of Grief as an Active Process, Death Studies, 15:4, pp. 385–393, 1991.
9.
KlapperJ.MossS.MossM., and RubinsteinR. L., The Social Context of Grief among Adult Daughters Who Have Lost a Parent, Journal of Aging Studies, 8:1, pp. 29–43, 1994.
10.
MorganD. L., Adjusting to Widowhood: Do Social Networks Really Make It Easier?The Gerontologist, 29:1, pp. 101–107, 1989.
11.
O'BryantS. L. and MorganL. A., Recent Widows' Kin Support and Orientations to Self-Sufficiency, The Gerontologist, 30:3, pp. 391–398, 1990.
12.
WoodJ. B. and ParhamI. A., Coping with Perceived Burden: Ethnic and Cultural Issues in Alzheimer's Family Caregiving, The Journal of Applied Gerontology, 9:3, pp. 325–339, 1990.
13.
WhiteM. M., We Are Family!: Kinship and Solidarity in the Black Community, in Expressively Black: The Cultural Basis of Ethnic Identity, GayG. and BaberW. L. (eds.), Praeger, New York, 1987.
14.
WilsonM. M. and TolsonT. F. J., Familial Support in the Black Community, Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 19:4, pp. 347–355, 1990.
15.
MartinJ. M. and MartinE. P., The Helping Tradition in the Black Family and Community, National Association of Social Workers, Silver Spring, Maryland, 1985.
16.
HillR. B., The Strengths of Black Families, Emerson Hall Publishers, Inc., New York, 1972.
17.
HainerJ., Widowhood as a Time for Growth and Development, The Psychotherapy Patient, 6:3–4, pp. 147–155, 1990.
18.
LopataH. Z., Women as Widows: Support Systems, Elsevier, New York, 1979.
19.
JohnsonC. L. and BarerB. M., Families and Networks among Older Inner-City Blacks, The Gerontologist, 30:6, pp. 726–733, 1990.
20.
CollinsP. H., Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of Power, Routledge, New York, 1991.
21.
CalhounL. G. and TedeschiR. G., Positive Aspects of Critical Life Problems: Recollections of Grief, Omega, 20:4, pp. 265–272, 1990.
22.
SchriverJ. M., Human Behavior and the Social Environment, Allyn and Bacon, Boston, Massachusetts, 1995.
23.
NewmanB. M. and NewmanP. R., Development through the Life Span: A Psychosocial Approach, The Dorsey Press, Homewood, Illinois, 1984. 102.
24.
GilliganC., In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women's Development, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1982.
25.
GilliganC., Reply to Critics, in An Ethic of Care: Feminist and Interdisciplinary Perspectives, LarrabeeM. J. (ed.), Routledge, New York, 1993.
26.
StackC., The Culture of Gender, in An Ethic of Care: Feminist and Interdisciplinary Perspectives, LarrabeeM. J. (ed.), Routledge, New York, 1993.
27.
SaleebeyD., Power in the People, in The Strengths Perspective in Social Work Practice, SaleebeyD. (ed.), Longman, New York, 1992.
28.
WeickA., Building a Strengths Perspective for Social Work, in The Strengths Perspective in Social Work Practice, SaleebeyD. (ed.), Longman, New York, 1992.
29.
LoflandJ. and LoflandL. H., Analyzing Social Settings, Wadsworth Publishing Company, Boston, Massachusetts, 1995.
30.
LincolnY. and GubaE. G., Naturalistic Inquiry, Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, California, 1985.
31.
TuttyL. M.RotheryM. A., and GrinnellR. M., Qualitative Research for Social Workers, Allyn and Bacon, Boston, Massachusetts, 1996.
32.
BergB. L., Qualitative Research Methods for the Social Sciences, Allyn and Bacon, Boston, Massachusetts, 1995.
33.
NeumanW. L., Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches, Allyn and Bacon, Boston, Massachusetts, 1994.
