Traditionally, technical writing has been characterized by impersonal, mechanical, objective prose. However, this attempt to deanthropomorphize reality must ultimately fail because science cannot escape metaphorical language. There is a move in technical writing today toward a personalized, sometimes called “friendly,” writing style which is strikingly evident in many computer textbooks and instructional manuals.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
EdieJ. M., Speaking and Meaning: The Phenomenology of Language, Indiana University Press, Bloomington, Indiana, 1976.
2.
WhitburnM. D., Personality in Scientific and Technical Writing, Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 6:4, pp. 299–306, 1977.
3.
HalloranS. M. and WhitburnM. D., Ciceronian Rhetoric and the Rise of Science: The Plain Style Reconsidered, in The Rhetorical Tradition and Modern Writing, MurphyJ. J. (ed.), Modern Language Association, in press.
4.
FindlayW. and WattD. A., Pascal: An Introduction to Methodical Programming, Computer Science Press, Potomac, Maryland, 1978.
5.
KaufmanR. E., A Fortran Coloring Book, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1978.
6.
DyckV. A.LawsonJ. D., and SmithJ. A., Introduction to Computing: Structured Problem Solving Using WATFIV-S, Reston Publishing Company, Reston, Virginia, 1979.
7.
KreitzbergC. B. and ShneidermanB., Fortran Programming: A Spiral Approach, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, New York, 1975.
8.
RichardsonC., The Applesoft Tutorial, Apple Computing, Inc., Cupertino, California, 1980.
9.
StewartG., Getting Started With TRS-80 BASIC, Tandy Corporation, Ft. Worth, Texas, 1980.
