Poetic Emotion and Poetic Style: The 100 Poems Most Frequently Included in Anthologies and the Work of Emily Dickinson

Abstract

The 100 most frequently anthologized English poems and the work of Emily Dickinson were analyzed empirically in terms of emotion, sound, and style. Results for the 100 poems indicated that poetry was significantly more Pleasant, less Active, more highly Imaged, and in several ways more complex than normal everyday English. In terms of sounds, the 100 poems included significantly more Sad, Passive, Soft, and Pleasant sounds and fewer Active and Nasty sounds than everyday English. Because of relationships between measures, seven factors were sufficient to explain most of the differences among poems. The 100 most frequently anthologized poems are ranked individually in terms of these factors. The poems of Emily Dickinson were significantly less Pleasant, less Active, and more Negative, though containing more Active and Nasty sounds.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Dickinson

(1960). The poems of Emily Dickinson ( Johnson

T. H.

, Ed.). Boston: Little Brown.

Grimaud

(1993). Tools for the study of verse. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 11, 79–82. http://members.aol.com/givenrandy/r_emily.htm

McDermott

J. F.

(2001). Emily Dickinson's “Nervous prostration” and its possible relationship to her work. The Emily Dickinson Journal, 9, 71–86.

Forsyth

R. S.

(2000). Pops and flops: Some properties of famous English poems. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 18, 49–67.

Harmon

(Ed.). (1992). The top 500 poems. New York: Columbia University Press.

Matlin

M. W.

(1994). Cognition. Toronto: Harcourt Brace College.

Osgood

C. E.

(1969). On the whys and wherefores of E, P, and A. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 12, 194–199.

Oxenhandler

(1988). The chancing concept of literary emotion: A selective history. New Literary History, 20, 105–121.

Russell

J. A.

(1978). Evidence of convergent validity on the dimensions of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 1152–1168.

10.

Saussure

F. de

(1883). Course in general linguistics. (Transl. Harris

Roy

) London: Duckworth.

11.

Tsur

(1992). What makes sound patterns expressive? The poetic mode of speech perception. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

12.

Whissell

(1998). Evaluating predictions about emotion and imagery in literature: Mary Shelley's Frankenstein as an example. TEXT Technology, 8, 59–73.

13.

Whissell

(1998). A parsimonious technique for the analysis of word-use patterns in English texts and transcripts. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 86, 595–613.

14.

Whissell

(1999a). “Tis more than what is called mobility”: Structure and development towards understanding in Byron's Don Juan. Romanticism on the Net, 13, February.

15.

Whissell

(1999b). Holding emotional and linguistic rulers up to the poetry of Robert Frost. Psychological Reports, 85, 751–758.

16.

Whissell

(1999c). Phonosymbolism and the emotional nature of sounds: Evidence of the preferential use of particular phonemes in texts of differing emotional tone. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 89, 19–48.

17.

Whissell

(2000). Phonoemotional profiling: A description of the emotional flavour of English texts on the basis of phonemes employed in them. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 91, 617–648.

18.

Whissell

(2000). Emotion and closure in the sound expressiveness of quatrains from Edward Fitzgerald's Rubayat of Omar Khayyam. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 18, 135–149.

19.

Whissell

(2001). Sound and emotion in given names. Names, 49, 97–120.

20.

Whissell

(2002). Emotion conveyed by sound in the poetry of Alfred, Lord Tennyson. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 20, 137–155.