In this exploratory study, we investigated whether Virtual Reality (VR) has the potential to be a research tool for studying consciousness and cognition. We took into consideration both individual differences in absorption (leading to varying degrees of interaction and experience in VR), and the specific cognitive set with which the participant enters the VR (instructions emphasizing either introspective sensitization or metaphoric-symbolic cognition). High absorption was found to predispose subjects to experience an altered state of consciousness. Furthermore, this susceptibility was moderated by the cognitive set employed. Unfortunately, the particular VR game was rather violent, and tended to make our subjects “turn off” the focus on their own subjective experience. We speculate regarding future developments in this domain.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
MurrayD. J., Gestalt Psychology and the Cognitive Revolution, Harvester Wheatsheaf, New York, 1995.
2.
WildingJ., Bits and Spaces: Computer Simulation, in Thinking in Perspective: Critical Essays in the Study of Thought Processes, BurtonA.RadfordJ. (eds.), Methuen, London, pp. 159–180, 1978.
3.
PimentelK.TeixeiraK., Virtual Reality: Through the New Looking Glass (2nd Edition), Intel/McGraw-Hill, New York, 1995.
4.
HeimM., The Metaphysics of Virtual Reality, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1993.
5.
HilgardE. R., Consciousness in Psychology, Annual Review of Psychology, 31, pp. 1–26, 1980.
6.
NeisserU., Cognition and Reality, W. H. Freeman, San Francisco, 1976.
7.
ShepardR. N., Ecological Constraints on Internal Representation: Resonant Kinematics of Perceiving, Imagining, Thinking, and Dreaming, Psychological Review, 91:4, pp. 417–447, 1984.
8.
YatesJ., The Content of Awareness is a Model of the World, Psychological Review, 92, pp. 249–284, 1985.
9.
TartC. T., Multiple Personality, Altered States and Virtual Reality: The World Simulation Process Approach, Dissociation, 3:4, pp. 222–233, 1990.
10.
RevonsuoA., Consciousness, Dreams and Virtual Realities, Philosophical Psychology, 8:1, pp. 35–58, 1995.
11.
HirschmanE. C., On the Acquisition of Aesthetic, Escapist, and Agentic Experiences, Empirical Studies of the Arts, 1:2, pp. 157–172, 1983.
12.
TellegenA., Practicing the Two Disciplines for Relaxation and Enlightenment: Comment on “Role of the Feedback Signal in Electromyograph Biofeedback: The Relevance of Attention” by Quails and Sheehan, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 110:2, pp. 217–226, 1981.
13.
TellegenA., Note on Structure and Meaning of the MPQ Absorption Scale, unpublished manuscript, University of Minnesota, 1992.
14.
TellegenA.AtkinsonG., Openness to Absorbing and Self-Altering Experiences (“Absorption”), a Trait Related to Hypnotic Susceptibility, Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 83:3, pp. 268–277, 1974.
15.
ChurchA. T., Relating the Tellegen and Five-Factor Models of Personality Structure, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67:5, pp. 898–909, 1994.
16.
GliskyM. L.TatarynD. J.TobiasB. A.KihlstromJ. F.McConkeyK. M., Absorption, Openness to Experience, and Hypnotizability, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60:2, pp. 263–272, 1991.
17.
HoytI. P.NadonR.RegisterP. A.ChornyJ.FleesonW.GrigorianE. M.OttoL.KihlstromJ. F., Daydreaming, Absorption and Hypnotizability, International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, XXXVII:4, pp. 332–342, 1989.
18.
RamonthS. M., Absorption in Directed Daydreaming, Journal of Mental Imagery, 9:1, pp. 67–86, 1985.
19.
CouncilJ. R.KirschI.HafnerL. P., Expectancy Versus Absorption in the Prediction of Hypnotic Responding, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50:1, pp. 182–189, 1986.
20.
NadonR.HoytI. P.RegisterP. A.KihlstromJ. F., Absorption and Hypnotizability: Context Effects Reexamined, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60:1, pp. 144–153, 1991.
21.
GlicksohnJ.TsurR.GoodblattC., Absorption and Trance-Inductive Poetry, Empirical Studies of the Arts, 9:2, pp. 115–122, 1991.
22.
WildT. C.KuikenD.SchopflocherD., The Role of Absorption in Experiential Involvement, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69:3, pp. 569–579, 1995.
23.
GlicksohnJ., Cutting the “Gordonian Knot” using Absorption and Dream Recall, Journal of Mental Imagery, 15:3&4, pp. 49–54, 1991.
24.
GlicksohnJ.SalingerO.RoychmanA., An Exploratory Study of Syncretic Experience: Eidetics, Synaesthesia and Absorption, Perception, 21, pp. 637–642, 1992.
25.
QuailsP. J.SheehanP., Imagery Encouragement, Absorption Capacity, and Relaxation During Electromyograph Biofeedback, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52:5, pp. 981–987, 1981.
26.
GlicksohnJ.MouradB.PavellE., Imagination, Absorption and Subjective Time Estimation, Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 11:2, pp. 167–176, 1991–92.
27.
PekalaR. J.WengerC. F.LevineR. L., Individual Differences in Phenomenological Experience: States of Consciousness as a Function of Absorption, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48:1, pp. 125–132, 1985.
28.
GlicksohnJ., Rating the Incidence of an Altered State of Consciousness as a Function of the Rater's Own Absorption Score, Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 13:3, pp. 225–228, 1993–94.
29.
RocheS. M.McConkeyK. M., Absorption: Nature, Assessment, and Correlates, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59:1, pp. 91–101, 1990.
30.
GlicksohnJ., Hypnotic Behaviour Revisited: A Trait-Context Interaction, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 10:4, pp. 774–775, 1987.
31.
TellegenA., Multidimensional Personality Questionnaire, University of Minnesota, 1982.
32.
HuntH. T.ChefurkaC. M., A Test of the Psychedelic Model of Altered States of Consciousness: The Role of Introspective Sensitization in Eliciting Unusual Subjective Reports, Archives of General Psychiatry, 33, pp. 867–876, 1976.
33.
GlicksohnJ., Altered Sensory Environments, Altered States of Consciousness and Altered-State Cognition, Journal of Mind and Behavior, 14:1, pp. 1–12, 1993.
34.
MastersR. E. L.HoustonJ., The Varieties of Psychedelic Experience, Dell, New York, 1966.
35.
GlicksohnJ., The Induction of an Altered State of Consciousness as a Function of Sensory Environment and Experience Seeking, Personality and Individual Differences, 12:10, pp. 1057–1066, 1991.
36.
SuedfeldP., Stressful Levels of Environmental Stimulation, in Stress and Anxiety, Vol. 6, SarasonI. G.SpielbergerC. D. (eds.), Hemisphere, Washington, D.C., pp. 109–127, 1979.
37.
CalvertS. L.Siu-LanT., Impact of Virtual Reality on Young Adults' Physiological Arousal and Aggressive Thoughts: Interaction Versus Observation, Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 15, pp. 125–139, 1994.
38.
QuailsP. J.SheehanP. W., Role of the Feedback Signal in Electromyograph Biofeedback: The Relevance of Attention, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 110:2, pp. 204–216, 1981.
39.
TartC. T., States of Consciousness and State-Specific Sciences, Science, 176, pp. 1203–1210, 1972.
