Some drug prevention programs have attempted to re-focus the goals of their efforts into the areas of increased self-regard, behavioral change, and increased group cohesiveness. Aware of the many difficulties in evaluating such an approach, it was decided to measure changes in conscious self-regard, of students, the teacher's perception of this self-regard, and classroom group cohesiveness. There was a significant increase in cohesiveness and an accompanying increase in self-regard, though not quite statistically significant.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
NowlisH., Drugs on the College Campus, National Association of Personnel Administrators, 1967
2.
AubreyR. F., Drug education: Can teachers really do the job?, Teachers College Record, 72: 417–422, 1971
3.
GrantJ. A., Drug education based on knowledge, attitude and experience study, Journal of School Health, 41: 383–386, 1971
4.
SwisherJ. D.CrawfordJ. L., Evaluation of a short-term drug education program, School Counsellor, 18: 265–272, 1971
5.
HalleckS., The great drug education hoax, The Progressive, 34: 1–7, 1970
6.
SwisherJ. D.CrawfordJ.GoldsteinR.YuraM., Drug education: Pushing or preventing, Peabody Journal of Education, 49: 68–75, 1971
7.
HoranJ. J., Preventing drug abuse through behavioral change technology, Journal of the Student Personnel Association for Teacher Education, 1973, in press
8.
WylieR. C., The Self-Concept, University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln, 1961