Abstract
The following operational question was investigated: do two separate, independently developed models of mental imagery tap the same underlying psychological phenomena? Empirical implications were derived from a general cognitive-information model and a bio-feedback model to be tested simultaneously within the design of a single experiment. Three measures of imagery were employed: quantity, vividness and controllability. It is shown that differential manipulation of imagery by the two types of treatments produces a predictable set of results. This demonstration of transitivity and replicability of imagery results across experimental methods and laboratories is supportive of the validity of this, now popular, psychological concept.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
