Level three interactive videodisc instructional programs used in ways that create cognitive conflict are more effective in elementary teacher education than are those programs which do not create this involvement. Conflict can be provided through use of the engaging and engrossing videodisc examples either inductively when students work alone or deductively when students engage in peer discussion.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
DargenT. R., Five Basic Patterns to Use in Interactive Flow Charts, EITV Magazine, 13: 11, 1981.
2.
DaynesR., Designing and Developing Interactive Videodisc, Pacific Interactive, MMS, Subsidiary of Online Computer Systems, Germantown, Maryland, 1987.
FloydS. and FloydB., Handbook of Interactive Video, Knowledge Industries Publications, White Plains, New York, 1982.
5.
AbramsA., Effectiveness of Interactive Video in Teaching Basic Photography Skills, Association for Educational Communications and Technology, Las Vegas, Nevada, ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 267 754, 1986.
6.
BasionP. M., Instructor-Controlled Training in a Videodisc-Based Paramedical Program, Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 13: 2, pp. 123–130, 1985.
7.
BoscoJ., An Analysis of Evaluations of Interactive Video, in Interactive Video: The Educational Technology Anthology Series, Educational Technology Publications, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, pp. 130–140, 1989.
8.
LaurillardD. M., Videodisc Evaluation Report, Open University, Institute of Educational Technology, Walton, Bletchley, Bucks, England, ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 271 090, 1984.
9.
CarlsonH. and FalkD., Effective Use of Interactive Videodisc Instruction in Understanding and Implementing Cooperative Group Learning with Elementary Pupils in Social Studies and Social Education, Theory and Research in Social Education, 17: 3, pp. 241–258, 1989.
10.
JohnsonD. W. and JohnsonR., Circles of Learning, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1985.
11.
JohnsonD. W. and JohnsonR., Joining Together, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1982.
12.
SchmuckR. A. and SchmuckP. A., Group Processes in the Classroom, William Brown, Dubuque, Iowa, 1971.
13.
SlavinR., Cooperative Learning, Longman, White Plains, New York, 1983.
14.
SlavinR., Cooperative Learning and Student Achievement, Educational Leadership, pp. 31–33, 1988.
15.
BloomB., A Taxonomy of Educational Objectives-Handbook I: The Cognitive Domain, Longman, White Plains, New York, 1977.