We assigned sixty-two test-anxious undergraduates to eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR), rational emotive therapy (RET), and information only, which were administered in a single session by trained, “blind” therapists. At posttest, EMDR was most effective in reducing distress whereas RET decreased global test anxiety more than information only. These results may reflect the differential impact of EMDR and RET on verbalized distress and on combined affective and cognitive dimensions of test anxiety, respectively. Perceptions of therapist credibility and helpfulness of treatment moderated the results. We discuss the clinical and research implications of these findings.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AntrobusJ. S.AntrobusJ. S.SingerJ. L., Eye Movements Accompanying Daydreaming, Visual Imagery, and Thought Suppression, Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 69:3, pp. 244–252, 1964.
2.
SingerJ. L.AntrobusJ. S., Eye Movements during Fantasies: Imagining and Suppressing Fantasies, Archives of General Psychiatry, 12:1, pp. 71–76, 1965.
3.
ShapiroF., Efficacy of the Eye Movement Desensitization Procedure in the Treatment of Traumatic Memories, Journal of Traumatic Stress, 2:2, pp. 199–223, 1989.
4.
Shapiro, Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing: Basic Principles, Protocols, and Procedures, Guilford Press, New York, 1995.
5.
ShapiroF., Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR): Evaluation of Controlled PTSD Research, Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 27:3, pp. 209–218, 1996.
6.
DeBellC.JonesR. D., As Good as it Seems? A Review of EMDR Experimental Research, Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 28:2, pp. 153–163, 1997.
7.
LohrJ. M.KleinknechtR. A.TolinD. F.BarrettR. H., The Empirical Status of the Clinical Application of Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing, Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 26:4, pp. 285–302, 1995.
8.
AciernoR.HersenM. F.Van HasseltV. B.TremontG.MueserK. T., Review of the Validation and Dissemination of Eye-Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing: A Scientific and Ethical Dilemma, Clinical Psychology Review, 14:4, pp. 287–299, 1994.
9.
HerbertJ. D.MueserK. T., Eye Movement Desensitization: A Critique of the Evidence, Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 23:3, pp. 169–174, 1992.
10.
WilsonD. L.SilverS. M.CoviW. G.FosterS., Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing: Effectiveness and Autonomic Correlates, Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 27:3, pp. 219–229, 1996.
11.
DunnT. M.SchwartzM.HatfieldR. W.WiegeleM., Measuring Effectiveness of Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR) in Non-Clinical Anxiety: A Multi-Subject, Yoked-Control Design, Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 27:3, pp. 231–239, 1996.
12.
SandersonA.CarpenterR., Eye Movement Desensitization versus Image Confrontation: A Single-Session Crossover Study of 58 Phobic Subjects, Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 23:4, pp. 269–275, 1992.
13.
FoleyT.SpatesC. R., Eye Movement Desensitization of Public-Speaking Anxiety: A Partial Dismantling, Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 26:4, pp. 321–329, 1995.
14.
CarverC. S.ScheierM. F., Confidence, Doubt, and Coping with Anxiety, in Anxiety: Recent Developments in Cognitive, Psychophysiological, and Health Research, ForgaysD. G.SosnowskiT.WrzesniewskiK. (eds.), Hemisphere Publishing Co., Washington, D.C., pp. 16–19, 1992.
15.
BaumanW.MelnykW. T., A Controlled Comparison of Eye Movements and Finger Tapping in the Treatment of Test Anxiety, Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 25:1, pp. 29–33, 1994.
16.
GosselinP.MatthewsW. J., Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing in the Treatment of Test Anxiety: A Study of the Effects of Expectancy and Eye Movement, Journal of Behavioral Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 26:4, pp. 331–337, 1995.
17.
AlpertR.HaberR. N., Anxiety in Academic Achievement Situations, Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 61:2, pp. 207–215, 1960.
18.
CrowneD. P.MarloweD., A New Scale of Social Desirability Independent of Psychopathology, Journal of Consulting Psychology, 24:4, pp. 349–354, 1960.
19.
McCombsB. L.DobrovolnyJ. L., The Study Skills Questionnaire (SSQUES): Preliminary Validation of a Measure for Assessing Students' Perceived Areas of Weakness, paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Boston, 1980.
20.
SheehanP. W., A Shortened Form of Betts' Questionnaire Upon Mental Imagery, Journal of Clinical Psychology, 23:3, pp. 386–389, 1967.
21.
WestcottT. B.RosenstockE., Reliability of Two Measures of Imagery, Perceptual and Motor Skills, 42:3, pp. 1037–1038, 1976.
22.
WolpeJ., The Practice of Behavior Therapy (4th Edition), Pergamon Press, New York, 1990.
