Complex noun phrases, although key elements in technical writing for linguistically mature readers, also present major comprehension difficulties for others. This article establishes many important ways of paraphrasing complex noun phrases into simpler structures, and identifies the differences in meaning, style, is tone, and emphasis created by the paraphrases. Whereas many complex noun phrases at the start of the sentence can be easily paraphrased, those at the end of the sentence or embedded within the sentence present greater challenges. Similarly restrictive post-modifiers are easier to paraphrase than those that define. The principles are applied to a short legal text.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ScheurwegsG., Present Day English Syntax, Longman, 1959.
2.
QuirkR.GreenbaumS.LeechG., and SvartvikJ., A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language, Longman, 1985.
3.
JordanM. P., Cohesion with Restrictive Post-Modifiers in English—A Clause-Relational Approach Using Rank-Shifted Paraphrase Semantics, International Systemic Workshop for Corpus-Based Research, Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain, 1993. (To appear in Estudios Ingleses de la Universidad Complutense, Madrid, España.)
4.
GiltrowJ., Genre and the Pragmatic Implications of Revising for Plainness, Learned Conferences, Canadian Association for Teachers of Technical Writing, Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island, Canada, 1992.
5.
FirbasJ., Some Aspects of the Czechoslovak Approach to Functional Sentence Perspective, in Papers on Functional Sentence Perspective, DanesF. (ed.), Mouton, 1974.
6.
DanešF., Functional Sentence Perspective and the Organization of the Text, in Papers on Functional Sentence Perspective, DanešF. (ed.), Mouton, 1974.
7.
DahlO., What is New Information? in Reports on Text Linguistics Approaches to Word Order, EnkvistN. E. and KahenenV. (eds.), Text Linguistics Research Group, University of Göteborg, 1976.
8.
ChafeW. L., Language and Consciousness, Language, 50, 1978.
9.
PrinceE., Toward a Taxonomy of Given-New Information, Radical Pragmatics, ColeP. (ed.), Academic Press, 1981.
10.
JordanM. P.The Reader over your Shoulder: Some Linguistic Background, Technostyle, 9:1, pp. 1–14, 1990.
11.
JordanM. P., The Genre of Technical Abstracts, in The Seventeenth LACUS Forum, Della VolpeA. (ed.), Linguistics Association of Canada and the United States, pp. 507–527, 1990.
12.
NicholsonM. A., A Dictionary of American English Use (based on Fowler's Modern English Usage, Oxford University Press, England, 1957.
13.
CrystalD. and DavyD., Investigating English Style, Longman, 1969.
14.
GowersE., The Complete Plain Words, Penguin Books, 1975.
15.
JordanMichael P.Openings in Very Formal Technical Texts, Technostyle, 11:1, pp. 1–28, 1993.
16.
JordonMichael P., Sensitive Avoidance of Sercict Pronouns in Written English, in The Eighteenth LACUS Forum, BrendR. (ed.), Linguistics Association of Canada and the United States, pp. 445–455, 1992.
17.
JordanMichael P., An Integrated Three-Pronged Analysis of a Fund-Raising Letter in Discourse Description: Diverse Linguistic Analyses of a Fund-Raising Text, MannW. C., and ThompsonS. A. (eds.), John Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp. 171–226, 1992.
18.
JordanMichael P.Openings in Informal Scientific Texts and Openings in Quite Formal Scientific Texts, Technostyle, 9:2, pp. 1–19; 9:3, pp. 18–37, 1991.
19.
JordanMichael P., Clause Relations within the Anaphoic Nominal Group, The Sixteenth LACUS Forum, JordanM. P. (ed.), Linguistics Association of Canada and the United States, pp. 409–419, 1991.
20.
JordanMichael P., Beyond Impressionism: Evaluating Causal Connection in Technical Writing: Theory and Practice, FearingB. E. and SparrowW. K. (eds.), MLA, New York, pp. 102–114, 1989.
21.
Jordan MichaelP.Some Inter-Paragraph Connections in Formal Prose, Technostyle, 8:1/2, pp. 14–37, 1989.
22.
JordanMichael P., Some Advances in Clause-Relational Theory in Systemic Functional Approaches to Discourse, BensonJ. D., and GreavesW. S. (eds.), Ablex, Norwood, New Jersey, pp. 282–301, 1988.
23.
JordanMichael P., How Can Problem-Solution Structures Help Writers Plan and Write their Documents? in Solving Problems in Technical Writing, BeeneL. and WhiteP. (eds.), The University Press, Oxford, pp. 3–26, 1988.
