Mastery Testing and Student Learning: A Meta-Analysis

Abstract

A meta-analysis of forty-nine comparative studies showed that mastery testing generally has positive effects on student learning, but the size of effect in any single study depends on both the stringency of the mastery criterion used with the mastery group and the degree of experimental control employed in the study. Mastery effects were also more pronounced on the less able students in a classroom and were less noticeable in more able students. Finally, the analysis showed that mastery testing increased the amount of time needed for instruction.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Washburne

C. W.

and Marland

S. P.

Jr. , Winnetka: The History and Significance of an Educational Experiment, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1963.

Bloom

B. S.

, Mastery Learning, Evaluation Comment, 1: 2, University of California at Los Angeles, Center for the Study of Evaluation of Instructional Programs, Los Angeles, May, 1968.

Keller

F. S.

, “Good-bye, Teacher …,” Journal of Applied Behavioral Analysis, 1, pp. 79–89, 1968.

Kulik

J. A.

Kulik

C.-L. C.

, and Cohen

P. A.

, A Meta-analysis of Outcome Studies of Keller's Personalized System of Instruction, American Psychologist, 34: 4, pp. 307–318, 1979.

Guskey

T. R.

and Gates

S. L.

, A Synthesis of Research on Group-based Mastery Learning Program, paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, April, 1985. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 262 088).

Bangert-Drowns

R. L.

Kulik

J. A.

, and Kulik

C.-L. C.

, Meta-analysis of the Effects of Frequent Testing, paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, April, 1986.

Bangert-Drowns

R. L.

Kulik

J. A.

, and Kulik

C.-L. C.

, The Effects of Informative Feedback on Student Learning, Center for Research on Learning and Teaching, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, 1986.

Glass

G. V.

McGaw

, and Smith

M. L.

, Meta-analysis in Social Research, Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, 1981.

Arlin

and Webster

, Time Costs of Mastery Learning, Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, pp. 187–195, 1983.

10.

Benson

J. S.

and Yeany

R. H.

, Generalizability of Diagnostic-prescriptive Teaching Strategies across Student Locus of Control and Multiple Instructional Units, paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, Boston, April, 1980. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. 187 534).

11.

Blackburn

K. T.

and Nelson

, Differences between a Group Using a Traditional Format with Mastery Learning and a Group Using a Traditional Format Only in Developmental Mathematics Courses at the University Level: Implications for Teacher Education Programs, paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, April, 1985. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 258 948).

12.

Block

J. H.

, Student Learning and the Setting of Mastery Performance Standards, Educational Horizons, 50, pp. 183–191, 1972.

13.

Bostow

D. E.

and O'Connor

R. J.

, A Comparison of Two College Classroom Testing Procedures: Required Remediation Versus No Remediation, Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 6, pp. 599–607, 1973.

14.

Burrows

C. K.

and Okey

J. R.

, The Effects of a Mastery Learning Strategy on Achievement, paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Washington, DC, March, 1975.

15.

Caldwell

E. C.

Bissonnette

Klishis

M. J.

Ripley

Farudi

P. P.

Hochstetter

G. T.

, and Radiker

J. E.

, Mastery: The Essential Essential in PSI, Teaching of Psychology, 5, pp. 59–65, 1978.

16.

Chiappetta

E. L.

and McBride

J. W.

, Exploring the Effects of General Remediation in Ninth-graders' Achievement of the Mole Concept, Journal of Experimental Education, 64, pp. 609–614, 1980.

17.

Clark

C. P.

Guskey

T. P.

, and Benninga

J. S.

, The Effectiveness of Mastery Learning Strategies in Undergraduate Education Courses, Journal of Educational Research, 76, pp. 210–214, 1983.

18.

Decker

D. F.

, “Teaching to Achieve Learning Mastery by Using Retesting Techniques,” doctoral dissertation, Nova University, 1976. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 133 002).

19.

Dillashaw

F. G.

and Okey

J. R.

, Effects of a Modified Mastery Learning Strategy on Achievement, Attitudes, and On-task Behavior of High School Chemistry Students, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 20, pp. 203–211, 1983.

20.

Dunkelberger

G. E.

and Heikkinen

, The Influence of Repeatable Testing on Retention in Mastery Learning, School Science and Mathematics, 84, pp. 590–597, 1984.

21.

Dustin

D. S.

and Johnson

S. L.

, Some Effects of a Test Criterion, unpublished manuscript, State Univesrity of New York, Plttsburgh, 1974.

22.

Fagan

J. S.

, Mastery Learning: The Relationship of Mastery Procedures and Aptitude to the Achievement and Retention of Transportation—Environmental Concepts by Seventh Grade Students, Dissertation Abstracts International, 36: 5981, 1976. (University Microfilms No. 76-6402).

23.

Fehlen

J. E.

, Mastery Learning Techniques in the Traditional Classroom Setting, School Science and Mathematics, 76: 3, pp. 241–245, 1976.

24.

Fernald

P. S.

Chiseri

M. J.

Lawson

D. W.

Scroggs

G. F.

, and Riddell

J. C.

, Systematic Manipulation of Student Pacing, the Perfection Requirement, and Contact with a Teaching Assistant in an Introductory Psychology Course, Teaching of Psychology, 2, pp. 147–151, 1975.

25.

Fiel

R. L.

and Okey

J. R.

, The Effects of Formative Evaluation and Remediation on Mastery of Intellectual Skills, Journal of Educational Research, 68, pp. 253–255, 1975.

26.

Goldwater

B. C.

and Acker

L. E.

, Instructor-paced, Mass-testing for Mastery Performance in an Introductory Psychology Course, Teaching of Psychology, 2, pp. 152–155, 1975.

27.

Guskey

T. R.

Benninga

J. S.

, and Clark

C. B.

, Mastery Learning and Students' Attributions at the College Level, Research in Higher Education, 20, pp. 491–498, 1984.

28.

Guskey

T. R.

and Monsaai

J. A.

, Mastery Learning: A Model for Academic Success in Urban Junior Colleges, Research in Higher Education, 11, pp. 263–274, 1979.

29.

Honeycutt

J. K.

, The Effect of Computer Managed Instruction on Content Learning of Undergraduate Students, paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, April, 1974. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 089 682).

30.

Hutchcraft

F. R.

and Kruger

B. S.

, An Empirical Validation of the Unit Perfection Requirement in Personalized Systems of Instruction Methodology, paper presented at the Fourth National Conference on Personalized Instruction in Higher Education, San Francisco, April, 1977.

31.

Hymel

G. M.

and Gaines

W. G.

, An Investigation of John B. Carroll's Model of School Learning as a Basis for Facilitating Individualized Instruction by Way of School Organizational Patterning, paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York, April, 1977. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 136 414).

32.

Hymel

G. M.

and Mathews

, Effects of a Mastery Approach on Social Studies Achievement and Unit Evaluation, Southern Journal of Educational Research, 14, pp. 191–204, 1980.

33.

Jones

F. G.

, The Effects of Mastery and Aptitude on Learning, Retention, and Time, Dissertation Abstracts International, 35: 6537, 1975. (University Microfilm No. 75-8126).

34.

Knight

J. M.

Williams

J. D.

, and Jardon

M. L.

, The Effects of Contingency Avoidance on Programmed Student Achievement, Research in Higher Education, 3, pp. 11–17, 1975.

35.

Komaridis

G. V.

, The Effects of Four Testing Systems on Schedules of Study, Test Performance, and Retention of Materials, Dissertation Abstracts International, 32: 790A, 1971. (University Microfilms No. 71-19, 498).

36.

Kulik

J. A.

Kulik

C.-L. C.

, and Hertzler

E. C.

, Modular College Teaching with and without Required Remediation, Journal of Personalized Instruction, 2, pp. 70–75, 1977.

37.

Lawler

R. M.

, An Investigation of Selected Instructional Strategies in an Undergraduate Computer-managed Instruction Course, Dissertation Abstracts International, 32: 1190A–1191A, 1971. (University Microfilms No. 71-24,610).

38.

Leppmann

P. K.

and Herrmann

T. F.

, PSI- What are the Critical Elements?, paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Los Angeles, August, 1981. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 214 502).

39.

Lewis

E. W.

, The Effects of a Mastery Learning Strategy and an Interactive Computerized Quiz Strategy on Student Achievement and Attitude in College Trigonometry, Dissertation Abstracts International, 45: 2430A, 1984. (University Microfilms No. 8424589).

40.

Long

J. C.

Okey

J. R.

, and Yeany

R. H.

, The Effects of Diagnosis with Teacher or Student Directed Remediation on Science Achievement and Attitudes, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 15, pp. 505–511, 1978.

41.

Lueckmeyer

C. L.

and Chiappetta

W. L.

, An Investigation into the Effects of A Modified Mastery Learning Strategy on Achievement in a High School Human Physiology Unit, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 18, pp. 269–273, 1981.

42.

Martin

R. R.

and Srikameswaran

, Correlation between Frequent Testing and Student Performance, Journal of Chemical Education, 51, pp. 485–486, 1974.

43.

Meznarich

R. A.

, The Personalized System of Instruction with and without Repeated Testing-to-Mastery, Dissertation Abstracts International, 39: 2103A, 1978. (University Microfilms No. 7817198).

44.

Myers

R. R.

, The Effects of Mastery and Aptitude on Achievement and Attitude in an Introductory College Geography Course, Dissertation Abstracts International, 37: 5874, 1976. (University Microfilms No. 76-6436).

45.

Nation

J. R.

Knight

J. M.

Lamberth

, and Dyck

, Programmed Student Achievement: A Test of the Avoidance Hypothesis, Journal of Experimental Education, 42, pp. 57–61, 1974.

46.

Nation

J. R.

Massad

, and Wilkerson

, Student Performance in an Introductory Psychology Following Termination of the Programmed Achievement Contingency at Mid-semester, Teaching of Psychology, 4, pp. 116–119, 1977.

47.

Nation

J. R.

and Roop

S. S.

, A Comparison of Two Mastery Approaches to Teaching Introductory Psychology, Teaching of Psychology, 2, pp. 108–111, 1975.

48.

Okey

J. R.

, Altering Teacher and Pupil Behavior with Mastery Teaching, School Science and Mathematics, 74, pp. 530–535, 1974.

49.

Okey

J. R.

Brown

J. L.

, and Fiel

R. L.

, Diagnostic Evaluation Methods in Individualized Instruction, Science Education, 56, pp. 207–212, 1972.

50.

Saunders-Harris

R. L.

and Yeany

R. H.

, Diagnosis, Remediation, and Locus of Control: Effects on Immediate and Retained Achievement and Attitude, Journal of Experimental Education, 49, pp. 220–224, 1981.

51.

Semb

, The Effects of Mastery Criteria and Assignment Length on College-student Test Performance, Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 7, pp. 61–69, 1974.

52.

Sheldon

M. S.

and Miller

E. D.

, Behavioral Objectives and Mastery Learning Applied to Two Areas of Junior College Instruction, University of California, Los Angeles, 1973. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 082 730).

53.

Slavin

R. E.

and Karweit

N. L.

, Mastery Learning and Student Teams: A Factorial Experiment in Urban General Mathematics Classes, American Educational Research Journal, 21, pp. 725–736, 1984.

54.

Strasler

G. M.

, The Process of Transfer in a Learning for Mastery Setting, paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, April, 1978. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 174 642).

55.

Wentling

T. L.

, Mastery Versus Nonmastery Instruction with Varying Test Item Feedback Treatments, Journal of Educational Psychology, 65, pp. 50–58, 1973.

56.

Yeany

R. H.

Dost

R. J.

, and Matthew

R. W.

, The Effects of Diagnostic-prescriptive Instruction and Locus of Control on the Achievement and Attitudes of University Students, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 17, pp. 537–545, 1980.

57.

Anderson

L. W.

, Student Involvement in Learning and School Achievement, California Journal of Educational Research, 26, pp. 53–62, 1975.

58.

Anderson

L. W.

, Time to Criterion: An Experimental Study, paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Washington, DC, April, 1975. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 108 006).

59.

Anderson

L. W.

, An Empirical Investigation of Individual Differences in Time to Learn, Journal of Educational Psychology, 68, pp. 226–233, 1976.

60.

Bryant

W. D.

Pryne

H. B.

, and Gottinger

, Applying the Mastery Model to Sight Word Instruction for Disabled Readers, Journal of Experimental Education, 50, pp. 116–121, 1982.

61.

Omelich

C. L.

and Covington

M. V.

, Do the Learning Benefits of Behavioral Instruction Outweigh the Psychological Costs?, paper presented at the annual meeting of the Western Psychological Association, Los Angeles, April, 1981. (ERIC Document Reproduction No. ED 213 328).

62.

Swanson

D. H.

and Denton

J. J.

, Learning for Mastery Versus Personalized System of Instruction: A Comparison of Remediation Strategies with Secondary School Chemistry Students, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 14, pp. 515–524, 1977.

63.

Guskey

T. R.

, The Effects of Staff Development on Teachers' Perceptions about Effective Teaching, Journal of Educational Research, 78, pp. 378–381, 1982.

64.

Guskey

T. R.

, The Influence of Changes in Instructional Effectiveness upon the Affective Characteristics of Teachers, American Educational Research Journal, 21, pp. 245–259, 1984.