Past research shows there are more similarities than differences in the dream content of college students in several industrialized democracies. This study uses new results from dreams collected in Germany to support this past finding and suggest that dreams are more similar than different because they dramatize people's conceptions and concerns in relation to personal issues, which probably do not vary as much from country to country as culture does. It is further argued that this continuity between dream content and waking concerns, when combined with other parallels between dreaming and waking cognition, can be used to develop a cognitive theory of dreams. In addition, suggestions for future research with college students in Germany, the United States, and other countries are presented as a way to link personal conceptions and cultural changes.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AntrobusJ. (1978). Dreaming as cognition. In ArkinA.AntrobusJ., & EllmanS. (Eds.), The mind in sleep: Psychology and psychophysiology (pp. 569–581). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
2.
AntrobusJ. (1991). Dreaming: Cognitive processes during cortical activation and high afferent thresholds. Psychological Review, 98, 96–121.
3.
AntrobusJ. (2000). Theories of dreaming. In KrygerM.RothT., & DementW. (Eds.), Principles and practices of sleep medicine (3rd ed., pp. 472–481). Philadelphia: Saunders.
4.
BulkeleyK. (1999). Visions of the night: Dreams, religion, and psychology. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
5.
BusinkR., & KuikenD. (1996). Identifying types of impactful dreams: A replication. Dreaming, 6, 97–119.
6.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
7.
DomhoffG. W. (1996). Finding meaning in dreams: A quantitative approach. New York: Plenum.
8.
DomhoffG. W. (1999). New directions in the study of dream content using the Hall and Van de Castle coding system. Dreaming: Journal of the Association for the Study of Dreams, 9(2–3), 115–137.
9.
DomhoffG. (2003). The scientific study of dreams: Neural networks, cognitive development, and content analysis, Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
10.
DomhoffG. W.DunnS., & Meyer-GomesK. (2004). Can made-up dreams be detected? A comparison of made-up and real dreams. Unpublished manuscript, Santa Cruz, CA.
11.
DudleyL., & FungaroliJ. (1987). The dreams of students in a women's college: Are they different?ASD Newsletter, 4(6), 6–7.
12.
DudleyL., & SwankM. (1990). A comparison of the dreams of college women in 1950 and 1990. ASD Newsletter, 7, 3.
13.
FoulkesD. (1982). Children's dreams. New York: Wiley.
14.
FoulkesD. (1985). Dreaming: A cognitive-psychological analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
15.
FoulkesD. (1999). Children's dreaming and the development of consciousness. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
16.
FoulkesD., & FleisherS. (1975). Mental activity in relaxed wakefulness. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 84, 66–75.
17.
FoulkesD.HollifieldM.SullivanB.BradleyL., & TerryR. (1990). REM dreaming and cognitive skills at ages 5–8: A cross-sectional study. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 13, 447–465.
18.
FoulkesD.MeierB.StrauchI.KerrN.BradleyL., & HollifieldM. (1993). Linguistic phenomena and language selection in the REM dreams of German-English bilinguals. International Journal of Psychology, 28(6), 871–891.
19.
FoulkesD., & ScottE. (1973). An above-zero baseline for the incidence of momentarily hallucinatory mentation. Sleep Research, 2, 108.
20.
HallC. (1951, May). What people dream about. Scientific American, 184, 60–63.
21.
HallC. (1953a). A cognitive theory of dreams. Journal of General Psychology, 49, 273–282.
22.
HallC. (1953b). The meaning of dreams. New York: McGraw-Hill.
23.
HallC. (1984). An ubiquitous sex difference in dreams, revisited. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 1109–1117.
24.
HallC.DomhoffG. W.BlickK., & WeesnerK. (1982). The dreams of college men and women in 1950 and 1980: A comparison of dream contents and sex differences. Sleep, 5, 188–194.
25.
HallC., & NordbyV. (1972). The individual and his dreams. New York: New American Library.
26.
HallC., & Van de CastleR. (1966). The content analysis of dreams. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
27.
HartmannE. (1998). Dreams and nightmares. New York: Plenum.
28.
HartmannE.KunzendorfR. G.BaddourA.ChapwickM.EddinsM.KruegerC.LatraverseT., & ShannonR. (2002–2003). Emotion makes daydreams more dreamlike, more symbolic. Imagination, Cognition & Personality, 22, 255–274.
29.
HoelscherT.KlingerE., & BartaS. (1981). Incorporation of concern- and nonconcern-related verbal stimuli into dream content. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 90, 88–91.
30.
KerrN. (1993). Mental imagery, dreams, and perception. In FoulkesD. & CavalleroC. (Eds.), Dreaming as cognition (pp. 18–37). New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
31.
KlingerE. (1990). Daydreaming. Los Angeles: Jeremy P. Tarcher.
32.
KlingerE. (1999). Thought flow: Properties and mechanisms underlying shifts in content. In SingerJ. & SaloveyP. (Eds.), At play in the fields of consciousness (pp. 29–50). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
33.
KlingerE., & CoxW. (1987–1988). Dimensions of thought flow in everyday life. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 7, 105–128.
34.
KnudsonR. (2003). The significant dream as emblem of uniqueness: The fertilizer does not explain the flower. Dreaming, 13, 121–134.
35.
KunzendorfR. G.HartmannE.CohenR., & CutlerJ. (1997). Bizarreness of the dreams and daydreams reported by individuals with thin and thick boundaries. Dreaming, 7, 265–271.
36.
MeierB. (1993). Speech and thinking in dreams. In CavalleroC. & FoulkesD. (Eds.), Dreaming as cognition (pp. 58–76). New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
37.
NiklesC.BrechtD.KlingerE., & BursellA. (1998). The effects of current-concern-and nonconcern-related waking suggestions on nocturnal dream content. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 242–255.
38.
RieplM. (1992). “Contentanalysis und der diskurs in paartraumen.” Unveroeffentlichte Diplomarbeit (Unpublished Master's Thesis), Universitaet Muenchen, Munich.
39.
SchneiderA., & DomhoffG. W. (1995). The quantitative study of dreams [On-line]. Available at: www.dreamresearch.net
40.
SchredlM.PetraC.BishopA.GolitzE., & BuschtonsD. (2003). Content analysis of German students' dreams: Comparison to American findings. Dreaming, 13, 237–243.
41.
SingerJ. (1975). The inner world of daydreaming. New York: Harper and Row.
42.
SingerJ. (1993). Experimental studies of ongoing conscious experience. In SymposiumC. F. (Ed.), Experimental and theoretical studies of consciousness (Vol. 174; pp. 100–122). Oxford, England: John Wiley & Sons.
43.
SnyderF. (1970). The phenomenology of dreaming. In MadowL. & SnowL. (Eds.), The psychodynamic implications of the physiological studies on dreams (pp. 124–151). Springfield, IL: Thomas.
44.
SolmsM. (1997). The neuropsychology of dreams: A clinico-anatomical study. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
45.
TonayV. (1990/2). California women and their dreams: A historical and sub-cultural comparison of dream content. Imagination, Cognition and Personality10, 83–97.
46.
WinegarR. K., & LevinR. (1997). Sex differences in the object representations in the dreams of adolescents. Sex Roles, 36(7–8), 503–516.
