While urinalysis is used regularly as a tool to validate self-reported recent drug use, past research has been inconclusive in evaluating concordance between the two measures. In the current study, urinalysis results for cocaine and opiates are compared to self-reported three-day cocaine and opiate use with data collected through Houston's Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring (ADAM) Program between 1990 and 1999. Separate analyses are conducted for each year during the decade. Kappa statistics indicate that the strength of agreement between the two drug use measures is consistent over time. These findings suggest that the need for urinalysis should be reconsidered.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
HarrisonL., The Validity of Self-Reported Data on Drug Use, Journal of Drug Issues, 25, pp. 91–111, 1995.
2.
MieczkowskiT.BarzelayD.GropperB.WishE. D., Concordance of Three Measures of Cocaine Use in an Arrestee Population: Hair, Urine, and Self-Report, Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, 23, pp. 241–246, 1991.
3.
RosenfeldR.DeckerS., Discrepant Values, Correlated Measures: Cross-Cities and Longitudinal Comparisons of Self-Reports and Urine Tests of Cocaine Use among Arrestees, Journal of Criminal Justice, 21, pp. 223–230, 1993.
4.
WishE. D.HoffmanJ. A.NemesS., The Validity of Self-Reports of Drug Use at Treatment Admission and at Follow-Up: Comparisons with Urinalysis and Hair Assays, in The Validity of Self-Reported Drug Use: Improving the Accuracy of Survey Estimates, HarrisonL.HughesA. (eds.), National Institute of Drug Abuse, Rockville, Maryland, pp. 200–226, 1997.
5.
YacoubianG., Assessing ADAM's Domain: Past, Present, and Future, Contemporary Drug Problems, 27, pp. 121–135, 2000.
6.
National Institute of Justice, 1999 Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring (ADAM) Annual Report, Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., 2000.
7.
KaneR.YacoubianG., Patterns of Drug Escalation among Philadelphia Arrestees: An Assessment of the Gateway Theory, Journal of Drug Issues, 29:1, pp. 107–120, 1999.
8.
PetersR.YacoubianG.BaumlerE.RossM.JohnsonR., Heroin Use among Southern Arrestees: Regional Findings from the Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring (ADAM) Program, Journal of Addictions and Offender Counseling, in press.
9.
WellischJ.AnglinM. D.PrendergastM. L., Numbers and Characteristics of Drug-Using Women in the Criminal Justice System: Implications for Treatment, Journal of Drug Issues, 23:1, pp. 7–30, 1993.
10.
WishE. D., U.S. Drug Policy in the 1990s: Insights from New Data from Arrestees, The International Journal of the Addictions, 25, pp. 377–409, 1990.
11.
YacoubianG.UrbachB. J., Disproportional Involvement in the Use of Crack and Powder Cocaine: Findings from the Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring (ADAM) Program, Alternate Routes, 17, pp. 54–70.
12.
YacoubianG., Assessing the Temporal Stability of Drug-Using Classifications: An Examination of Washington, DC Arrestees between 1990 and 1997, Journal of Criminal Justice, 29:1, pp. 21–30, 2001.
MaguraS.KangS., Validity of Self-Reported Drug Use in High-Risk Populations: A Meta-Analytical Review, Substance Abuse and Misuse, 31, pp. 1131–1153, 1996.
15.
InciardiJ. A.McElrathK., The American Drug Scene, Roxbury Publishing Company, California, 1998.
16.
WalkerS., Sense and Nonsense About Crime and Drugs, Wadsworth Publishing Company, California, 1998.
