In this longitudinal study of 232 student-subjects in two public high schools, it was found, by a cross-lagged correlation method, that earlier psychopathology predicted to a statistically significant degree to substance use seventeen months later, and that earlier substance use also predicted to a statistically significant degree to later psychopathology. Thus it appears likely that there is an additive or cumulative interaction effect in which having psychiatric symptoms (psychopathology) contributes to the tendency to use drugs, and using drugs adds to the tendency to have psychiatric symptoms. Among the nine types of psychic symptoms measured, obsessive-compulsive symptoms, hostility, paranoid ideation and depression were found to be somewhat more predictive of later increase in substance use than the other types of psychic symptoms; and phobic anxiety was not predictive at all.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
CheinI.GerardD.LeeR., The Road to H, Basic Books, New York, 1964.
2.
McLellanA. T.WoodyG. E.O'BrienC. P., Development of Psychiatric Illness in Drug Abusers, The New England Journal of Medicine, 301, pp. 1310–1314, 1979.
3.
PatonS.KesslerR.KandelD., Depressive Mood and Illegal Drug Use: A Longitudinal Analysis, Journal of Genetic Psychology, 131, pp. 276–298, 1977.
4.
HaggenC. H., Social and Psychological Characteristics Associated with the Use of Marihuana by College Men, Wesleyan University, 1970.
5.
LernerJ. V.VicaryJ. R.Jr., Difficult Temperament and Drug Use: Analysis from the New York Longitudinal Study, Journal of Drug Education, 14:1, 1984.
6.
JessorR.JessorS. L., Problem Behavior and Psychosocial Development: A Longitudinal Study of Youth, Academic Press, New York, 1977.
7.
SmithG. M.FoggC. P., Teenage Drug Use: A Search for Causes and Consequences, paper presented at the 82nd Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, New Orleans, 1974.
8.
HalikisJ. A.RimmerJ. D., Predictors of Multiple Drug Abuse, Archives of General Psychiatry, 31, pp. 414–418, 1974.
9.
BurkeE. L.EichbergR. H., Personality Characteristics of Adolescents of Dangerous Drugs as Indicated by the MMPI, Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 154, pp. 291–301, 1972.
10.
SchoolarJ. C.WhiteE. H.CohenC. P., Drug Abusers and Their Clinic-Patient Counterparts: A Comparison of Personality Dimensions, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 39, pp. 9–14, 1972.
11.
McAreeC. P.StaffenhagenR. A.ZheutlinL. S., Personality Factors in College Drug Users, International Journal of Social Psychiatry, pp. 102–106, 1969.
12.
HenriquesE.ArsenianJ.CutterH., Personality Characteristics and Drug of Choice, The International Journal of Addictions, 7, pp. 73–76, 1976.
13.
StraussF. F.OusleyN. K.CarlinA. S., Psychopathology and Drug Abuse: An MMPI Comparison of Polydrug Abuse Patients with Psychiatric Inpatients and Outpatients, in Addictive Behaviors, Volume 2, Pergamon Press, pp. 75–78, 1977.
14.
LacharD.SchooffK.KeeganJ., Dimensions of Polydrug Abuse: An MMPI Study, in Polydrug Abuse: The Results of a National Collaborative Study, WessonD.CarlinA.AdamsK.BeschnerG. (eds.), Academic Press, Inc., New York, pp. 149–180, 1978.
15.
SmartR. G.FejerD., Illicit LSD Users: Their Social Background, Drug Use and Psychopathology, Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 10, pp. 297–398, 1969.
16.
KellerJ.RedferingD. L., Comparison Between the Personality of LSD Users and Nonusers as Measured by the MMPI, Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, pp. 156,271–277, 1973.
17.
KandelD. B., Stages of Adolescent Involvement in Drug Use, Science, 190, pp. 912–914(c), 1975.
18.
RoyseD.DrudeK., Screening Drug Abuse Client with the Brief Symptom Inventory, The International Journal of the Addictions, 19:8, pp. 849–857, 1984.
19.
JohnstonL. D.BachmanJ. G.O'MalleyP. M., Student Drug Use in America, 1975–1981, National Institute on Drug Abuse, U. S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Services, Alcohol, Drug Abuse, and Mental Health Administration, Rockville, Maryland, 1981.
20.
White House Paper on Drug Abuse, A Report to the President from the Domestic Council Drug Abuse Task Force, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., 1975.
21.
DerogatisL. R.SpencerP. M., Administration and Procedures: BSI Manual-I, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, 1982.
22.
CampbellD. T., More Plausible Rival Hypotheses in the Cross-lagged Panel Correlation Technique, Psychological Bulletin, 71, pp. 74–80, 1969.
23.
KennyD. A., Cross-lagged Panel Correlation: A Test for Spuriousness, Psychological Bulletin, 82, pp. 887–903, 1975.
24.
KennyD. A., A Quasi-experimental Approach to Assessing Treatment Effects in the Nonequivalent Control Group Design, Psychological Bulletin, 82, pp. 345–362, 1975.
25.
LazarsfeldP. F., Mutual Relations Over Time of Two Attributes: A Review and Integration of Various Approaches, in Psychopathology, HammerM.SalzingerK.SuttonS. (eds.), Wiley, New York, 1972.
