Functional theory, as conceptualized by Dance and Larson [1], provided the framework for examining how individuals utilize imagined interactions to link conflict episodes. Proactive and retroactive functions of imagined interactions were conceptualized as a vehicle through which the mentation function of communication is accomplished. As such, the current study sought to determine the amount of conflict participants reported in their imagined interactions, the reported interaction partners, the amount of conflicts that were linked to one another, the level of the conflict, use of verbally aggressive messages in the imagined interactions, and the amount of physical aggression reported in participants' imagined interactions. Overall, results indicated that behavioral, normative, and personal level conflicts are routinely experienced, symbolically, through imagined interactions. Conflict partners included a variety of individuals, but mainly significant others, friends, and bosses. Moreover, results indicated that individuals use proactive and retroactive imagined interactions to link conflict episodes, and conflictual imagined interactions are characterized, to some degree, by verbally aggressive messages and to a lesser extent by incidents of physical violence.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
DanceF. E. X., and LarsonC. E., The Functions of Human Communication, Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, New York, 1976.
2.
EdwardsR.HoneycuttJ., and ZagackiK. S., Imagined Interaction as an Element of Social Cognition, Western Journal of Speech Communication, 52, pp. 23–45, 1988.
3.
HoneycuttJ. M.EdwardsR., and ZagackiK. S., Using Imagined Interaction Features to Predict Measures of Self-awareness: Loneliness, Locus of Control, Self-dominance, and Emotional Intensity, Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 9, pp. 17–31, 1989–1990.
4.
HoneycuttJ. M.ZagackiK. S., and EdwardsR., Imagined Interaction, Conversational Sensitivity and Communication Competence, Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 12, pp. 139–157, 1992–1993.
5.
EdwardsR.HoneycuttJ., and ZagackiK., Sex Differences in Imagined Interaction, Sex Roles, 21, pp. 259–268, 1989.
6.
AllenT., The Effects of Machiavellianism on Imagined Interaction, Communication Research Reports, 7, pp. 116–120, 1990.
7.
GotcherJ. M., and HoneycuttJ. M., An Analysis of Interaction of Forensics Participants, National Forensics Journal, 7, pp. 1–20, 1989.
8.
ZagackiK. S.EdwardsR., and HoneycuttJ. M., The Role of Mental Imagery and Emotion in Imagined Interaction, Communication Quarterly, 40, pp. 56–68, 1992.
9.
GendrinG. M., An Intrapersonal Process in Cross-cultural Adaptation: Imagined Interactions among Temporary Sojourners, in Mental Imagery, KunzendorfR. (Ed.), Plenum Press, New York, pp. 129–138, 1991.
10.
AllenT. H.DavidN., and KungR., A Socio-cultural Approach to Information Processing: Exploring the Combined Roles of Thought, Language, and Context, in Intrapersonal Communication Processes, AitkenJ. and ShedletskyL. J. (eds.), Midnight Oil & Speech Communication Association, Plymouth, Michigan, pp. 105–116, 1995.
11.
AllenT. H. and EdwardsR., The Effects of Planning and Imagined Interaction on Message Strategy Use, paper presented at the annual National Communication Association Conference, Atlanta, Georgia, 1991.
12.
HoneycuttJ. M., Imagined Interactions, Imagery and Mindfulness/mindlessness, in Mental Imagery, KunzendorfR. (ed.), Plenum Press, New York, pp. 121–128, 1991.
13.
HoneycuttJ. M., Memory, Gender and the Development of Romance, Guilford Press, New York, 1996.
14.
HoneycuttJ. M., The Oral History Interview and Reports of Imagined Interaction as Marriage Therapy, Journal of Family Psychotherapy, 6, pp. 63–69, 1995.
15.
HoneycuttJ. M., Imagined Interactions, Recurrent Conflict and Thought about Personal Relationships: A Memory Structure Approach, in Intrapersonal Communication Processes, AitkenJ. E. and ShedletskyL. J. (eds.), Midnight Oil & Speech Communication Association, Plymouth, Michigan, pp. 138–150, 1995.
16.
AllenT. H., Planning and Creativity: Is More Better? paper presented at the annual Speech Communication Association conference, Miami, Florida, 1993.
17.
AllenT. H. and HoneycuttJ. M., Planning, Imagined Interaction, and the Nonverbal Display of Anxiety, Communication Research, 24:1, pp. 64–83, 1997.
18.
HoneycuttJ. M., Imagined Interactions: Daydreaming about Communication, pp. 67–90, Hampton, Crossbill, New Jersey, pp. 67–90, 2003.
19.
RosenblattP. C. and MeyerC. J., Imagined Interactions and the Family, Family Relations, 35, pp. 319–324, 1986.
20.
BlamerH., Society as Symbolic Interaction, in Symbolic Interaction: A Reader in Social Psychology, ManisG. J. and MeltzerB. N. (eds.), Allyn and Bacon, Boston, pp. 97–103, 1978.
21.
HoneycuttJ. M., A Functional Analysis of Imagined Interaction Activity in Everyday Life, in Imagery: Current Perspectives, ShortJ. E.RobinP.CorneliaJ. A., and WolpinM. (eds.), Plenum Press, New York, pp. 13–25, 1989.
AllenT. and EdwardsR., The Effects of Imagined Interaction and Planning on Speech Fluency, paper presented at the speech Communication Association Convention, Atlanta, Georgia, 1991.
24.
CooleyC. H., Human Nature and the Social Order, Charles Scribner's Sons, New York, 1902.
25.
PearceW. B. and CronenV. E., Communication, Action, and Meaning: The Creation of Social Realities, Praeger, New York, 1980.
26.
WatzlawickP.BeavinJ. H., and JacksonD. D., Pragmatics of Human Communication, Norton, New York, 1967.
27.
HoneycuttJ. M. and WiemannJ. M., Analysis of Functions of Talk and Reports of Imagined Interactions (IIs) During Engagement and Marriage, Human Communication Research, 25, pp. 399–419, 1999.
28.
KlingerE., Current Concerns and Disengagement from Incentives, in Motivation, Intention, and Violation, HalischF. and KuhlJ. (eds.), Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp. 337–347, 1987.
29.
BraikerH. B. and KelleyH. H., Conflict Development of Close Relationships, in Social Exchange in Developing Relationships, BurgessR. L. and HustonT. L. (eds.), Academic Press, New York, pp. 135–168, 1979.
30.
InfanteD. A. and WigleyC. J., Verbal Aggressiveness: An Interpersonal Model and Measure, Communication Monographs, 53, pp. 61–69, 1986.
31.
InfanteD. A.ChandlerT. A., and RuddJ. E., Test of an Argumentative Skill Deficiency Model of Interspousal Violence, Communication Monographs, 56, pp. 163–177, 1989.
32.
BulmerM., Concepts in the Analysis of Qualitative Data, Sociological Review, 27, pp. 651–677.
33.
CohenJ., A Coefficient Agreement for Nominal Scales, Emotional and Psychological Measurement, 20, pp. 37–46, 1960.
34.
GoffmanE., Relations in Public, Basic Books, New York, 1974.
