In this article we present a partially realized project for building a distributed learning environment for studying digital circuits Test and Diagnostics at TU-Sofia. We describe the main requirements for this environment, substantiate the developer platform choice, and present our simulation and circuit parameter calculation tools. Administrative, Demo, and Service tools are fully realized and presented in the article. Serial fault simulator and ATPG with random input vectors are also presented. Some tools for fault diagnosis are developed and presented in the article. We discuss and compare modern semantic technologies for publishing functionalities of our application as semantic web services to make them easily searchable and usable from the internet. Initial version of ontology, conceptualizing valuable domain and semantic web service terminology is developed and conceptual model, using this ontology for dynamic service discovery and composition is presented and discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ElawadyY.TolbaA., Educational Objectives of Different Laboratory Types: A Comparative Study. International Journal of Computer Science and Information Security, 6:2, pp. 089–096, 2009.
2.
PerezS.DiazO.MeliaS.GomezJ., Facing Interaction-Rich RIAs: The Orchestration Model. ICWE '08, Eighth International Conference on Web Engineering, pp. 24–37, 2008.
MartinD., Bringing Semantics to Web Services: The OWL-S Approach, in Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Semantic Web Services and Web Process Composition (SWSWPC 2004), San Diego, California, USA, 2004. Retrieved 2004 from URL: http://www.daml.org/services/owl-s/OWL-S-SWSWPC2004-CameraReady.doc
NauD.AuT.IlghamiO.KuterU.MurdockJ.WuD.YamanF., SHOP2: An HTN Planning System, Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 20, pp. 379–404, 2003.
14.
RomanD.KiferM.FenselD., WSMO Choreography: From Abstract State-machines to Concurrent Transaction Logic, in Proceedings of the 5th European SemanticWeb Conference (ESWC 2008), number 5021 in LNCS, Springer, New York, pp. 659–673, 2008.
W3C, Web Services Description Language (WSDL), Version 2.0, Part 1: Core Language. Retrieved 2007 from URL: http://www.w3.org/TR/wsdl20
18.
BattleS.BernsteinA.BoleyH.GrosofB.GruningerM.HullR.KiferM.MartinD.McIlraithS.McGuinnessD.SuJ.TabetS., Semantic Web Services Language (SWSL). W3C, Retrieved 2005 from URL: http://www.w3.org/Submission/SWSF-SWSL
19.
BattleS.BernsteinA.BoleyH.GrosofB.GruningerM.HullR.KiferM.MartinD.McIlraithS.McGuinnessD.SuJ.TabetS., Semantic Web Services Ontology (SWSO). W3C, Retrieved 2005 from URL: http://www.w3.org/Submission/SWSF-SWSO.
20.
SrinivasanN., Adding OWL-S to UDDI, Implementation and Throughput, 1st International Workshop on Semantic Web Services and Web Process Composition, 2004.
21.
KourtesisD.ParaskakisI., Combining SAWSDL, OWL-DL and UDDI, for Semantically Enhanced Web Service Discovery, The 5th Annual European Semantic Web Conference—ESWC, 2008.
22.
LuoJ., Adding OWL-S Support to the Existing UDDI Infrastructure, ICWS '06 Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Web Services, 2006.
23.
SrinivasanN., Semantic Web Service Discovery in the OWL-S IDE, HICSS '06. Proceedings of the 39th Annual Hawaii International Conference System Sciences, 2006.
24.
SrinivasanN.PaolucciM.SycaraK., CODE: A Development Environment for OWL-S Web Services, Demo paper in 3rd International Semantic Web Conference, 2004.
25.
An Approach to Semantic Web Services Publication and Discovery Based on OWL Ontology Inference, 2010, Si Huayou; Ni Yulin; Chen Zhong; Yu Lian; Zhao Yun; Service Oriented System Engineering (SOSE), 2010 Fifth IEEE International Symposium on Issue Date: June 4–5, 2010.
26.
AverbakhA., Exploiting User Feedback to Improve Semantic Web Service Discovery, 8th International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC 2009).
