We assessed knowledge of retrieval processes in young (25–35 years) and old adults (70–85 years). Both feeling-of-knowing judgments and retrieval monitoring were examined with a set of questions about recent news events. For answers that participants initially failed to recall, they rated their feeling-of-knowing as well as made predictions regarding the likelihood of recalling the answer with the aid of a specified type of retrieval cue (retrieval monitoring). Accuracy was evaluated in the context of later recall or recognition performance. We found age group differences in the accuracy of retrieval monitoring, free recall, and recall aided by phonological cues. Using a separate inventory, we found no evidence for age group differences in participants' knowledge of general retrieval principles.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
CavanaughJ. C.GradyJ. G., and PerlmutterM., Forgetting and the Use of Memory Aids in 20 to 70 Year Old's Everyday Life, International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 17 (2), pp. 113–122, 1983.
2.
BrownA. L., The Development of Memory: Knowing, Knowing about Knowing, and Knowing How to Know, in Advances in Child Development and Behavior, Vol. 10, ReeseH. W. (ed.), Academic Press, New York, pp. 103–152, 1975.
3.
BrownA. L., Knowing When, Where, and How to Remember: A Problem of Metacognition, in Advances in Instructional Psychology, Vol. 1, GlaserR. (ed.), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, New Jersey, pp. 77–165, 1978.
4.
HultschD. F., Adult Age Differences in Retrieval: Trace-dependent and Cue-dependent Forgetting, Developmental Psychology, 11, pp. 197–201, 1975.
5.
TaubH. A., Aging and Free Recall, Journal of Gerontology, 23, pp. 466–468, 1968.
6.
CraikF. M., Age Differences in Human Memory, in Handbook of the Psychology of Aging, BirrenJ. E. and SchaieK. W. (eds.), Van Nostrand Reinhold Co., New York, pp. 384–420, 1977.
7.
MaddenD. J., Age-related Slowing in the Retrieval of Information from Long-term Memory, Journal of Gerontology, 40, pp. 208–210, 1985.
8.
MachtM. L. and BuschkeH., Age Differences in Cognitive Effort in Recall, Journal of Gerontology, 38, pp. 695–700, 1983.
9.
HartJ. T., Memory and the Feeling-of-knowing Experience, Journal of Educational Psychology, 56, pp. 208–216, 1965.
10.
LachmanR. and LachmanJ. L., Age and the Actualization of World Knowledge, in New Directions in Memory and Aging, PoonL. W.FozardJ. L.CermakL. S.ArenbergD., and ThompsonL. W. (eds.), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, New Jersey, pp. 519–544, 1980.
11.
GrunebergM. and MonksJ., Feeling of Knowing and Cued Recall, Acta Psychologica, 38, pp. 257–265, 1974.
12.
HartJ. T., Memory and the Memory Monitoring Process, Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 6, pp. 685–691, 1967.
13.
LachmanJ. L.LachmanR., and ThronesberyC., Metamemory through the Adult Life Span, Developmental Psychology, 15(5), pp. 543–551, 1979.
14.
PerlmutterM., What is Memory Aging the Aging of?Developmental Psychology, 14, pp. 330–345, 1978.
15.
AnooshianL. J.AshbrookP., and HertelP. T., Self-esteem and Beliefs about Memory in Environmentally Stable and Relocated Students, Journal of Research in Personality, 19, pp. 457–471, 1985.
16.
BransfordJ. D.FranksJ. J.MorrisC. D., and SteinB. S., Some General Constraints on Learning and Memory Research, in Levels of Processing and Human Memory, CermakL. S. and CraikF. I. M. (eds.), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, New Jersey, 1979.
17.
NelsonD. L.WheelerJ. W.BordenR. C., and BrooksD. H., Levels of Processing and Cueing: Sensory vs. Meaning Features, Journal of Experimental Psychology, 103, pp. 971–977, 1974.
18.
ThomsonD. M. and TulvingE., Associative Encoding and Retrieval: Weak and Strong Cues, Journal of Experimental Psychology, 86, pp. 255–1262, 1970.
19.
HertelP. T.AnooshianL. J., and AshbrookP., The Accuracy of Beliefs about the Benefits of Retrieval Cues, Memory and Cognition, 14, pp. 265–269, 1986.
20.
SmithS. M., Enhancement of Recall using Multiple Environmental Contexts during Learning, Memory and Cognition, 10, pp. 405–412, 1982.
21.
McCallR. B. and AppelbaumM. I., Bias in the Analysis of Repeated-measures Designs: Some Alternative Approaches, Child Development, 44, pp. 401–415, 1973.
22.
ButtersN., Potential Contributions of Neuropsychology to Our Understanding of the Memory Capacities of the Elderly, in New Directions in Memory and Aging, PoonL. W.FozardJ. L.CermakL. S.ArenbergD., and ThompsonL. W. (eds.), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, New Jersey, pp. 451–459, 1980.
