The schism between theory and practice is reflected in English studies. British technological universities have attempted to meet the needs of industry in technical fields. Economic and academic pressures often make this difficult. A degree in modern English studies is planned which attempts to combine traditional academic values and functional needs. A new approach to rhetoric combining linguistic and critical disciplines with practical skills in communication can combine liberal and vocational needs. The course content of the degree and the teaching approach is related to the ethos of a technological university.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
MitchellJohn H., “A Time for Practicums in Communication,”Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 2(1): 1–3, January, 1972.
2.
DoughtyPeter, “Pupils Also Use Language to Live: A Defense of a Linguistic Approach to Language Study for the Classroom,”English in Education, 6(1): 17–28, Spring, 1972.
3.
BratchellD. F., “Nonspecialist English Studies in Higher Education,”English in Education, 5(1): 65–78, Spring, 1971.
4.
BratchellD. F., “Technical Communication in Britain,”Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 1(4): 299–306, October, 1971.
5.
AllenDon Cameron, The Ph.D. in English and American Literature, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York, 1968.
6.
HughesRichard E.Albert DuhamelP., Rhetoric: Principles and Usage, Prentice Hall Inc., New Jersey, 1962.
7.
DixonPeter, Rhetoric, Methuen, London, 1971.
8.
DixonPeter, Rhetoric, pp. 1 and 3, Methuen, London, 1971.
9.
BratchellD. F., Communication and Technology, English, 19(105): 93–96, and loc. cit. 3 above, Autumn, 1970.
10.
GangewereRobert J., “The Vices of Technical Writing,”Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 2(1): 60, January, 1972.
11.
KirkmanA. J., “Vocabulary of University Students,”Educational Research, 9(2): 151–159, February, 1967.
