The study investigated if young students internalized content and concepts embedded in a science computer microworld simulation as opposed to treating it as merely a game to be played. The article reports changes in the Grade Two students' cognitive outcomes and processes after learning with the software integrated within a thematic curriculum in a classroom over a period of six weeks. Results indicate improvement in various thinking skills and strategies, from basic recall to the higher level skills such as classification and inference, as well as in the children's usage of scientific language. Transfer occurred but was not significant thereby emphasizing the importance of providing numerous practices instead of relying on the software to teach higher order cognitive skills. Daily usage and a flexible paired working environment with the computer were pedagogical variables in the cognitive outcomes.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
GregoireR.BracewellR.LaferriereT., The Contribution of New Technologies to Learning and Teaching in Elementary and Secondary Schools, 1996. [Online] http://www.tact.fse.ulaval.ca/fr/htm/apport/impact96.html Accessed 6 September 1999.
2.
BialoE.Sivin-KachalaJ., The Effectiveness of Technology in Schools: A Summary of Recent Research, School Library Media Quarterly, pp. 51–57, Fall 1996.
3.
JonesT.PaolucciR., The Learning Effectiveness of Educational Technology: A Call for Further Research, Educational Technology Review, 9, pp. 10–14, Spring/Summer 1998.
4.
KangassaloM., Children's Independent Exploration of a Natural Phenomenon by Using a Pictorial Computer-Based Simulation, in Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, OttmanT.TomekI. (eds.), Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education, Charlottesville, pp. 311–316, 1994.
5.
ShadeD.WatsonJ., Computers in Early Education: Issues Put to Rest, Theoretical Links to Sound Practice, and the Potential Contribution of Microworlds, Journal of Educational Computing Research, 6:4, pp. 375–392, 1990.
RieberL., Seriously Considering Play: Designing Interactive Learning Environments Based on the Blending of Microworlds, Simulations, and Games, Educational Technology Research & Development, 44:2, pp. 43–58, 1996.
RieberL. P.SmithL.NoahD., The Value of Serious Play, Educational Technology, 38:6, pp. 29–37, 1998.
10.
SalopekJ., Workstation Meets Playstation, Training and Development, pp. 26–35, August 1998.
11.
McKinnonD.NolanC.SinclairK., The Freyberg Integrated Studies Project in New Zealand: A Longitudinal Study of Secondary Student's Attitudes towards Computers, Their Motivation and Performance, in Technology and Communications: Catalyst for Educational Change. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Conference on Technology and Education, International Conferences on Technology and Education (eds.), New Orleans, pp. 463–465, March 1996.
12.
ReevesT., Pseudoscience in Qualitative Research, 1997. [Online] ITFORUM listserv. Access date: March 7, 2000.
13.
SelwynN., The Continuing Weaknesses of Educational Computing Research, British Journal of Educational Technology, 28:4, pp. 305–307, 1997.
14.
ClarkR. E., Media Will Never Influence Learning, Educational Technology Research and Development, 42:2, pp. 21–29, 1994.
15.
GlennaT. K.MelmedA., Fostering the Use of Educational Technology: Elements of a National Strategy. A Rand Report, Rand, Santa Monica, California, 1996. [Also Online] http://www.rand.org/publications/MR/MR682/contents.html Accessed 15 April 1999.
16.
JonassenD. H., Computers in the Classroom, Prentice-Hall, New York, 1996.
17.
Plano Independent School District Curriculum Group, Curriculum Integration: A Framework and Design (Mimeo), Plano Independent School District, Plano, Texas, 1994.
18.
PapertS., The Children's Machine: Rethinking School in the Age of the Computer, Basic Books, New York, 1993.
19.
ThurmanR., Instructional Simulation from a Cognitive Psychology Viewpoint, Educational Technology Research & Development, 41:4, pp. 75–79, 1993.
20.
WhitelockD.TaylorJ.O'SheaT.ScanlonE.ClarkP.O'MalleyC., What Do You Say After You Have Said Hello? Dialogue Analysis of Conflict and Cooperation in a Computer Supported Collaborative Learning Environment, paper presented at the 11th International PEG Conference, Edinburgh, July 2–4, 1993.
21.
BrushT., The Effects of Group Composition on Achievement and Time on Task for Students Completing ILS Activities in Cooperative Pairs, Journal of Research on Computers in Education, 30:1, pp. 2–17, 1997.
22.
InkpenK., Three Important Research Agendas for Educational Multimedia: Learning, Children, and Gender, in Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia and Telecommunications, 1997, Vol. 1, MuldnerT.ReevesT. (eds.), Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education, Charlottesville, pp. 521–526, 1997.
23.
InkpenK.BoothK.GribbleS.KlaweM., Give and Take: Children's Collaboration on One Computer, Proceedings of CHI'95, Conference Companion, ACM Press, New York, pp. 258–259, 1995.
24.
UpitisR.KochC., Is Equal Computer Time Fair for Girls? Potential Internet Inequities, paper presented at 6th Annual Conference of the Internet Society, INET'96, Montreal, 1996.
25.
TempleC., Developmental Cognitive Neuropsychology, Psychology Press, Hove, United Kingdom, 1997.
26.
PriceE.DriscollM., An Inquiry into the Spontaneous Transfer of Problem-Solving Skill, Contemporary Educational Psychology, 22, pp. 472–494, 1997.
27.
SalomonG.PerkinsD., Rocky Roads to Transfer: Rethinking Mechanisms of a Neglected Phenomenon, Educational Psychologist, 24, pp. 113–142, 1989.
28.
CormierS., The Structural Processes Underlying Transfer of Training, in Transfer of Learning: Contemporary Research and Applications, CormierS.HagmanJ. (eds.), Academic Press, London, 1987.
29.
EvansJ., Deciding Before You Think: Relevance and Reasoning in the Selection Task, British Journal of Psychology, 87, pp. 223–231, 1996.
30.
D'AndradeR., The Development of Cognitive Anthropology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1995.
31.
HarmonM., The Role of Strategies and Knowledge in Problem Solving: A Review of the Literature, ERIC No. ED366640, Mississippi, 1993.
32.
GallimoreR.TharpR., Teaching Mind in Society: Teaching, Schooling, and Literate Discourse, in Vygotsky and Education: Instructional Implications and Applications of Sociohistorical Psychology, MollL. (ed.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 175–205, 1990.
33.
HendersonL., Instructional Design of Interactive Multimedia: A Cultural Critique, Educational Technology Research & Development, 44:4, pp. 85–104, 1996.
34.
RothW., Learning to Talk Engineering Design: Results from an Interpretive Study in a Grade 4/5 Classroom, International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 6, pp. 107–135, 1996.
35.
BennetN.DunneE., The Nature and Quality of Talk in Cooperative Classroom Groups, Learning and Instruction, 1, pp. 103–118, 1991.
36.
SalomonG., Novel Constructivist Learning Environments: Some Issues to be Concerned With, paper presented at Thinking in Teaching and Learning Conference, Jerusalem, January 1998.
37.
JohnsonD.JohnsonR., Co-operative Learning: One Key to Computer Assisted Learning, The Computing Teacher, 13:2, pp. 11–14, 1985.
38.
NastasiB.ClementsD., Motivational and Social Outcome of Cooperative Computer Education Environments, Journal of Computing in Childhood Education, 4:1, pp. 15–43, 1993.
39.
SlavinR., Research on Cooperative Learning and Achievement: What We Know, What We Need to Know, Contemporary Educational Psychology, 21, pp. 43–69, 1996.
40.
AbramiP.ChambersB., Research on Cooperative Learning and Achievement: Comments on Slavin, Contemporary Educational Psychology, 21, pp. 70–79, 1996.
41.
LouY.AbramiP.SpenceJ.D'ApolloniaS.ChambersB.PoulsenC., A Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Homogeneous versus Heterogeneous Group Ability Composition on Student Achievement: Looking at the “Best” Evidence, paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York, April 1996.
42.
CreeseM., Students' Attitudes to Science Education: A Preliminary Survey, Educational Research, 32:3, pp. 218–224, 1990.
43.
ScottT.ColeM.EngelM., Computers and Education: A Cultural Constructivist Perspective. Review of Research in Education, American Education Research Association, Washington, 1992.
44.
LevineT., A Computer-Based Program Can Make a Difference: The Case of the Rediscover Science Program, Studies in Educational Evaluation, 20, pp. 293–296, 1994.
45.
HendersonL.EshetY.KlemesY., Educational Multimedia Implementation in Schools: Producer-Teacher-Student Links, in Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 1998, OttmanT.TomekI. (eds.), Association of the Advancement of Computing in Education, Charlottesville, pp. 531–536, 1998.
46.
MaloneT., Toward a Theory of Intrinsically Motivating Instruction, Cognitive Science, 5:4, pp. 333–369, 1981.
47.
MaloneT.LepperM., Making Learning Fun: A Taxonomy of Intrinsic Motivations for Learning, in Aptitude, Learning, and Instruction, III: Conative and Affective Process Analysis, SnowR.FarrM. (eds.), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, New Jersey, pp. 223–253, 1987.
48.
TabakI.ReiserB., Complementary Roles in Software-Based Scaffolding and Teacher-Student Interactions in Inquiry Learning, in Proceedings of Computer Support for Collaborative Learning '97, HallR.MiyakeN.EnyedyN. (eds.), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, New Jersey, pp. 289–298, 1997.
