“Taste” is often used to describe sensitivity to both foods and visual art. We examined whether a biological marker of physical taste sensitivity influenced aesthetic preferences. In three studies, we measured physical taste sensitivity by exposing participants to the chemical phenylthiocarbamide (PTC) and having them rate how bitter it tasted (if they tasted it at all). Across all studies, miscalibrated physical taste sensitivity (extremely high and low taste bud density) related to extreme negative responses to disturbing and provocative artwork. Miscalibrated physical taste sensitivity was related specifically to avoiding (high disgust) disturbing artwork, but not to approach-related negative affect (anger). These findings provide novel evidence regarding biological influences on aesthetic preferences.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AikenL. S., & WestS. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
2.
AugustineM. D., & LederH. (2006). Art expertise: A study of concepts and conceptual spaces. Psychology Science, 48, 135–156.
3.
AxelssonÖ. (2007). Individual differences in preferences for photographs. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 1, 61–72.
4.
BartholomewK., & HorowitzL. M. (1991). Attachment styles among young adults: A test of the four-category model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 226–244.
5.
BartoshukL. M. (2000). Psychophysical advances aid the study of genetic variation in taste. Appetite, 34, 105.
6.
BartoshukL. M.DuffyV. B., & MillerI. J. (1994). PTC/PROP taste: Anatomy, psychophysics, and sex effects. Physiology & Behavior, 56, 1165–1171.
7.
BaumeisterR. F.BratslavskyE.FinkenauerC., & VohsK. D. (2001). Bad is stronger than good. Review of General Psychology, 5, 323–370.
8.
BourdieuP. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgment of taste. London: Routledge and Kegan.
9.
CarverC. S., & Harmon-JonesE. (2009). Anger is an approach-related affect: Evidence and implications. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 183–204.
10.
CooperJ. M., & SilviaP. J. (2009). Opposing art: Rejection as an action tendency of hostile aesthetic emotions. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 27, 109–126.
11.
DrewnowskiA.HendersonS. A.ShoreA. B., & Barratt-FornellA. (1997). Nontasters, tasters, and supertasters of 6-n-Propylthiouracial (PROP) and hedonic response to sweet. Physiology & Behavior, 62, 649–655.
12.
DriscollK.PerezM.CukrowiczK.ButlerM., & JoinerT. (2006). The associations of phenylthiocarbamide (PTC) tasting to alcohol problems and family history of alcoholism differ by gender. Psychiatry Research, 143, 21–27.
13.
FinkelE. J., & SlotterE. B. (2007). An attachment theory perspective on the perpetration of intimate partner violence. DePaul Law Review, 56, 895–907.
14.
FiskeS. T. (1980). Attention and weight in person perception: The impact of negative and extreme behavior. Journal of Experimental Research in Personality, 22, 889–906.
15.
FrankR. A., & KorchmarD. L. (1985). Gustatory processing differences in PTC tasters and non-tasters: A reaction time analysis. Physiology & Behavior, 35, 239–242.
16.
GoldbergL. R.JohnsonJ. A.EberH. W.HoganR.AshtonM. C.CloningerC. R. (2006). The international personality item pool and the future of public-domain personality assessment. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 84–96.
17.
HareR. D. (2003). The Hare, PCL-R (2nd ed.). Toronto, Ontario: Multi-Health Systems.
18.
HazanC., & ShaverP. (1987). Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 511–524.
19.
HellmuthJ. C., & McNultyJ. K. (2008). Neuroticism, marital violence and the moderating role of stress and behavioral skills. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 166–180.
20.
HodgesB. H. (1974). Effect of valence on relative weighting in impression formation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30, 378–381.
21.
HolbrookM. B.WeissM. J., & HabichJ. (2004). Class-related distinctions in American cultural tastes. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 22, 91–115.
22.
JoinerT., & PerezM. (2004). Phenylthiocarbamide (PTC) tasting and family history of depression, revisited: Low rates of depression in families of supertasters. Psychiatry Research, 126, 83–87.
23.
KalmusH. (1958). Improvements in the classification of the taster genotypes. Annals of Human Genetics, 22, 222–230.
24.
KashdanT. B.RoseP., & FinchamF. D. (2004). Curiosity and exploration: Facilitating positive subjective experiences and personal growth opportunities. Journal of Personality Assessment, 82, 291–305.
25.
KozbeltA. (2006). Dynamic evaluation of Matisse's 1935 Large Reclining Nude. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 24, 119–137.
26.
KraaykampG. (2002). Cumulative advantages and inequality in lifestyle: A Dutch description of distinction in taste. The Netherlands' Journal of Social Sciences, 38, 121–143.
27.
KuninD.BlochR. T.TeradaY.RoganF., & SmithB. R. (2001). Caffeine promotes an ethanol-induced conditioned taste aversion: A dose-dependent interaction. Psychopharmacology, 9, 326–333.
28.
LakoffG., & JohnsonM. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to Western thought.New York: Basic Books.
29.
LocherP. J.SmithJ. K., & SmithL. F. (2001). The influence of presentation format and viewer training in the visual arts on the perception of pictorial and aesthetic qualities of paintings. Perception, 30, 449–465.
30.
McWhinnieH. J. (1968). A review of research on aesthetic measure. Acta Psychologica, 28, 363–375.
31.
MeierB. P.HauserD. J.RobinsonM. D.FriesenC. K., & SchjeldahlK. (2007). What's “up” with God? Vertical space as a representation of the divine. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 699–710.
32.
MeierB. P., & RobinsonM. D. (2004). Why the sunny side is up: Associations between affect and vertical position. Psychological Science, 15, 243–247.
33.
MeierB. P.RobinsonM. D., & CloreG. L. (2004). Why good guys wear white: Automatic inferences about stimulus valence based on brightness. Psychological Science, 15, 82–87.
34.
MikulincerM., & ShaverP. R. (2007). Attachment in adulthood: Structure, dynamics and change. New York: The Guilford Press.
35.
MobergP. J.BalderstonC. C.RickJ. H.RoalfD. R.WeintraubD.Kleiner-FismanG. (2007). Phenylthiocarbamide (PTC) perception in Parkinson disease. Cognitive and Behavioral Neurology, 20, 145–148.
36.
MobergP. J.McGueC.KanesS. J.RoalfD. R.BalderstonC. C.GurR. E. (2007). Phenylthiocarbamide (PTC) perception in patients with schizophrenia and first-degree family members: Relationship to clinical symptomatology and psychophysical olfactory performance. Schizophrenia Research, 90, 221–228.
37.
PalmatierM. I., & BevinsR. A. (2001). Chronic caffeine exposure in rats blocks a subsequent nicotine-conditioned taste avoidance in a one-bottle, but not a two-bottle test. Pharmacology, Biochemistry and Behavior, 70, 279–289.
38.
ParsonsM. J. (1987). How we understand art: A cognitive developmental account of aesthetic experience.New York: Cambridge University Press.
39.
ReberR.SchwartzN., & WinkielmanP. (2004). Processing fluency and aesthetic pleasure: Is beauty in the perceiver's processing experience?Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8, 364–382.
40.
SchallerM. (2006). Parasites, behavioral defenses, and the social psychological mechanisms through which cultures are evoked. Psychological Inquiry, 17, 96–101.
41.
SchallerM., & DuncanL. A. (2007). The behavioral immune system: Its evolution and social psychological implications. In ForgasJ. P.HaseltonM. G., & von HippelW. (Eds.), Evolution and the social mind: Evolutionary psychology and social cognition (pp. 293–307). New York: Psychology Press.
42.
SilviaP. J. (2005a). Cognitive appraisals and interest in visual art: Exploring an appraisal theory of aesthetic emotions. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 23, 119–133.
43.
SilviaP. J. (2005b). What is interesting? Exploring the appraisal structure of interest. Emotion, 5, 89–102.
44.
SilviaP. J. (2006). Artistic training and interest in visual art: Applying the appraisal model of aesthetic emotions. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 24, 139–161.
45.
SilviaP. J. (2007). Knowledge-based assessment of expertise in the arts: Exploring aesthetic fluency. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 1, 247–249.
46.
SilviaP. J. (2009). Looking past pleasure: Anger, confusion, disgust, pride, surprise, and other unusual aesthetic emotions. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 3, 48–51.
47.
SilviaP. J. (2010). Confusion and interest: The role of knowledge emotions in aesthetic experience. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 4, 75–80.
48.
SilviaP. J. (in press). Human emotions and aesthetic experience: An overview of empirical aesthetics. In ShimamuraA. & PalmerS. E. (Eds.), Aesthetic science: Connecting minds, brains, and experience. New York: Oxford University Press.
49.
SilviaP. J., & BaronaC. M. (2009). Do people prefer curved objects? Angularity, expertise, and aesthetic preference. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 27, 25–42.
50.
SilviaP. J., & BergC. (2011). Finding movies interesting: How expertise and appraisals influence the aesthetic experience of film. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 29, 73–88.
51.
SilviaP. J., & BrownE. M. (2007). Anger, disgust, and the negative aesthetic emotions: Expanding an appraisal model of aesthetic experience. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 1, 100–106.
52.
SilviaP. J.MartinC.NusbaumE. C. (2009). A snapshot of creativity: Evaluating a quick and simple method for assessing divergent thinking. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 4, 79–85.
SmithL., & SmithJ. (2006). The nature and growth of aesthetic fluency. In LocherP.MartindaleC., & DorfmanL. (Eds.), New direction in aesthetics, creativity, and the arts (pp. 47–58). Amityville, NY: Baywood.
55.
SnedecorS. M.PomerleauC. S.MehringerA. M.PomerleauO. F., & NinowskiR. (2006). Differences in smoking-related variables based on phenylthiocarbamide ‘taster’ status. Addictive Behaviors, 31, 2309–2312.
56.
TepperB. J., & NurseR. J. (1997). Fat perception is related to PROP taster status. Physiology and Behavior, 61, 949–954.
57.
TolaasJ. (1991). Notes on the origin of some spatialization metaphors. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 6, 203–218.
58.
TurnerS. A.Jr., & SilviaP. J. (2006). Must interesting things be pleasant? A test of competing appraisal structures. Emotion, 6, 670–674.
59.
VohsK. D.BaumeisterR. F., & CiaroccoN. J. (2005). Self-regulation and self-presentation: Regulatory resource depletion impairs impression management and effortful self-presentation depletes regulatory resources. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 632–657.
60.
VonkR. (1993). The negativity effect in trait ratings and in open-ended descriptions of persons. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 269–278.
61.
WatsonD. (2000). Mood and temperament.New York: Guilford.
62.
WatsonD.ClarkL. A., & TellegenA. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063–1070.
63.
WeyersP.MuhlbergerA.HefeleC., & PauliP. (2006). Electromyographic responses to static and dynamic avatar emotional facial expressions. Psychophysiology, 5, 450–453.
