Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The present research constructed a complexity scale of color combinations and examined whether the scale can account for aesthetic judgments. Twenty-eight Japanese undergraduate students rated 96 color combinations on scales of complexity, pleasantness, and interestingness. In two factors of composing color combinations, complexity was defined by both factors of the color relations (similarity or contrast between component colors) and of the number of colors. This confirms that the subjective complexity scale in color combinations is well explained by compositions of these two factors. Pleasantness showed a relationship with complexity suggestive of an inverted-U function in mean ratings; however, the relationship between interestingness and complexity was linear. These relations suggest that the complexity scale is closely related to the aesthetic judgments.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Attneave

(1957). Physical determinants of the judged complexity of shapes. Journal of Psychology, 53, 221–227.

Avital

, & Cupchik

C. C.

(1998). Perceiving hierarchical structures in nonrepresentational paintings. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 16, 59–70.

Berlyne

D. E.

(1971). Aesthetics and psychobiology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

Berlyne

D. E.

(Ed.). (1974). Studies in the new experimental aesthetics: Steps toward an objective psychology of aesthetic appreciation. Washington, DC: Hemisphere.

Birkhoff

G. D.

(1933). Aesthetic measure. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Eysenck

H. J.

(1941). A critical and experimental study of color preference. American Journal of Psychology, 54, 385–394.

Guilford

J. P.

(1940). There is system in color preference. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 30, 455–459.

Hayashi

(1952). On the prediction of phenomena from qualitative data and the quantification of qualitative data from the mathematico-statistical point of view. Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, 3, 69–93.

Hekkert

, & van Wieringen

P. C. W.

(1990). Complexity and prototypicality as determinants of the appraisal of cubist paintings. British Journal of Psychology, 81, 483–495.

10.

Japan Color Research Institute. (Ed.). (1982). PCCS Harmonic Color Chart 201. Japan Color Enterprise Co. Ltd.

11.

Moon

, & Spencer

D. E.

(1944). Aesthetic measure applied to color harmony. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 34, 234–242.

12.

Munsinger

H. L.

, & Kessen

(1964). Uncertainty, structure and preference. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 78, 1–24.

13.

Murakami

Akiyama

Asaka

Morimoto

& Ohmi

(1998). An analysis of evaluative scales of design: Example of corporate marks. Proceeding of the Annual Conference of JSSD, 45, 200–201. (in Japanese).

14.

Nasar

J. L.

(2002). What design for a presidential library? Complexity, typicality, order, and historical significance. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 20, 83–99.

15.

Nayatani

(2003). Adequateness of a newly modified opponent-color theory. Color Research & Application, 28, 298–307.

16.

Nayatani

Tsujino

Ikeda

, & Namba

(1969). An appraisal of two-color harmony by comparison method. Acta Chromatica, 2, 1–15.

17.

Ohmi

(1982). Factor analytical study on evaluation of children's art. Bulletin of Woman's College of Fine Arts 12, 1–23. (in Japanese).

18.

Ohmi

Harada

Matsuo

, & Ikeda

(1997). An analysis of evaluative scales of affective meanings of colors (1). Journal of the Color Science Association of Japan, 21(Suppl.), 28–29. (in Japanese).

19.

L. C.

, & Luo

M. R.

(2006). A colour harmony for two-colour combinations. Color Research & Application, 21, 191–204.

20.

Oyama

Soma

Tomiie

, & Chijiiwa

(1965). A factor analytical study on affective responses to colors. Acta Chromatica, 1, 164–173.

21.

Russell

P. A.

, & Milne

(1997). Meaningfulness and the hedonic value of paintings: Effects of titles. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 15, 61–73.

22.

Walker

E. L.

(1971). Psychological complexity and preference: A hedgehog theory of behavior. In Berlyne

D. E.

& Masen

K. B.

(Eds.), Pleasure, reward, preference: Their nature, determinants, and role in behavior (pp. 65–97). New York and London: Academic Press.

23.

Whitfield

T. W. A.

, & Wiltshire

T. J.

(1990). Color psychology: A critical review. Generic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 116, 387–409.

Complexity Scale and Aesthetic Judgments of Color Combinations

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References