Maybe,Maybe Even Probably,But Not Necessarily: Response to Martindale

Abstract

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Gombrich

E. H.

(1984). Tributes: Interpreters of our cultural tradition. Oxford: Phaidon.

Gombrich

E. H.

(2002). The preference for the primitive. London: Phaidon.

Kozbelt

(2008a). E. H. Gombrich on creativity: A cognitive-historical case study. Creativity Research Journal, 20, 93–104.

Kozbelt

(2008b). Gombrich, Galenson, and beyond: Integrating case study and typological frameworks in the study of creative individuals. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 26, 51–68.

Kozbelt

(2008). Longitudinal hit ratios of classical composers: Reconciling Darwinian and expertise acquisition perspectives on lifespan creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 2, 221–235.

Kozbelt

, & Durmysheva

(2007). Lifespan creativity in a non-Western artistic tradition: A study of Japanese ukiyo-e printmakers. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 65, 23–51.

Martindale

(1990). The clockwork muse: The predictability of artistic change. New York: Basic Books.

Martindale

(2009). The evolution and end of art as Hegelian tragedy. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 27(2), 133–140.

Simonton

D. K.

(1977). Creative productivity, age, and stress: A biographical time-series analysis of 10 classical composers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 791–804.

10.

Simonton

D. K.

(1999). Origins of genius: Darwinian perspectives on creativity. New York: Oxford University Press.