The Effects of Visual Illustrations on Learners' Achievement and Interest in PDA- (Personal Digital Assistant) Based Learning

Abstract

PDAs (Personal Digital Assistants) have been used widely in educational settings. In this study, the visual illustration of a scientific text (cognitive-interest illustration, emotional-interest illustration, or no illustration) was manipulated to investigate its impact on student interest in instructional materials, achievement, and time spent on reading materials in PDA-based learning. Forty-five graduate students were randomly assigned to one of the three treatment groups: the cognitive-interest illustration group, emotional-interest illustration group, and the text only group. Each group was given instructional material corresponding to the treatments. Results revealed that the levels of post-interest across the groups were not significantly different among the three groups. However, the students in the cognitive-interest illustration group showed significantly higher achievement than those in the emotional illustration group and the text only group. Implications of the findings as a catalyst for further research in the development of instructional materials for PDA-based learning were discussed.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anglin

G. J.

Towers

R. L.

, & Levis

W. H.

(1996). Visual message design and learning: The role of static and dynamic illustrations. In Jonassen

D. H.

(Ed.), Handbook of research for educational communications and technology (pp. 755–794). New York: Simon & Schuster Macmillan.

Bateman

Crystal

Davidson

Holzberg

C. S.

McIntire

, & McLester

(2001). Top ten technologies breaking through for schools. Technology and Learning, 22, 22–32.

Fasimpaur

(2002, May). The Power of Using “Palm Size” Handheld Computers in Education. Paper presented at the computer using in education (CUE), Anaheim, California.

Garner

Gillingham

, & White

(1989). Effects of “seductive details” on macro-processing and microprocessing in adults and children. Cognition and Instruction, 6(1), 41–57.

Harp

S. F.

(1997). How seductive details do their damage: A cognitive theory of interest in science learning. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of California, Santa Barbara.

Harp

S. F.

, & Mayer

R. E.

(1997). The role of interest in learning from scientific text and illustrations: On the distinction between emotional interest and cognitive interest. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(1), 92–102.

Izard

C. E.

, & Ackerman

B. P.

(2000). Motivational, organizational, and regulatory functions of discrete emotions. In Lewis

& Haviland-Jones

J. M.

(Eds.), Handbook of emotion (Vol. II, pp. 253–264). New York: Guilford Publications, Inc.

Kintsch

(1980). Learning from text, levels of comprehension. Poetics, 9(9), 87–98.

Krapp

Hidi

, & Renninger

(1992). Interest, learning, and development. In Krapp

Hidi

, & Renninger

(Eds.), The role of interest in learning and development (pp. 3–25). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Association.

10.

Levie

J. R.

, & Lentz

(1982). Effects of text illustrations: A review of research. Educational Communication and Technology Journal, 30(4), 195–232.

11.

Park

Kim

Ryu

, & Son

(2003). The effect of character spacing on reading in personal digital assistants (PDAs), Proceedings of the Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE) E-Learn 2003 World Conference, Phoenix, Arizona.

12.

Park

, & Lim

(2004). The effect of graphical representation of science text on the learner's learning interest and achievement in multimedia learning. Proceedings of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology (AECT) World Conference, Chicago, Illinois.

13.

Son

Kim

, & Park

(2004). The case analysis of PDA integrated classroom. Proceedings of the Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE) SITE 2004 World Conference, Atlanta, Georgia.

14.

Song

S. H.

(1998). The effects of motivationally adaptive computer-assisted instruction developed through ARCS model. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Florida State University, Tallahassee.

15.

Thalheimer

(2004, April). Bells, whistles, neon, and purple prose: When interesting words, sounds, and visuals hurt learning and performance—A review of the seductive-augmentation research. Retrieved December 16, 2004, from http://www.work-learning.com/seductive_augmentations.htm

16.

Tobias

(1994). Interest, prior knowledge, and learning. Review of Educational Research, 64, 37–54.

17.

Wade

S. E.

, & Adams

(1990). Effects of importance and interest on recall of biographical text. Journal of Literacy, 22, 331–353.