On Structure in the Creative Process: A Quantitative Case-Study of the Creation of Picasso's Guernica

Abstract

This article presents a quantitative analysis of Picasso's preliminary works for his painting Guernica, to examine the nature of the thought processes underlying creation of this great work of art and to demonstrate the usefulness of quantitative methods in studying creation of a single work of art. Results indicated that the preliminary works for Guernica were drawn from a very limited subject matter, which was closely related to the event that stimulated the painting. In addition, the overall structure of the painting can be seen from the very first sketches. Finally, the idea which served as the core for Guernica came out of Picasso's work at that time. These findings indicate that Picasso's creative process can be looked upon as elaborating a kernel idea, rather than generating numerous different ideas, and culling the final direction from them at a later stage. These results have two implications. Specifically, they indicate that it is possible to analyze the structure in Picasso's thought processes; more broadly, they demonstrate that development of individual works of art can be analyzed using quantitative methods to test hypotheses concerning the creative process.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Chipp

(1988). Picasso's Guernica: History, transformations, meanings. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

Dunbar

(1995). How scientists really reason: Scientific reasoning in real-world laboratories. In Sternberg

R. J.

& Davidson

J. E.

(Eds.), The nature of insight (pp. 365–395). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Gardner

(1993). Creating minds. An anatomy of creativity seen through the lives of Freud, Einstein, Picasso, Stravinsky, Elliot, Graham, and Gandhi. New York: Basic.

Hayes

J. R.

(1989). Cognitive processes in creativity. In Glover

J. A.

Ronning

R. R.

, & Reynolds

C. R.

(Eds.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 135–145). New York: Plenum.

Hennessey

B. A.

, & Amabile

T. M.

(1988). The conditions of creativity. In Sternberg

R. J.

(Ed.), The nature of creativity. Contemporary psychological perspectives (pp. 11–38). New York: Cambridge University Press.

Martindale

(1990). The clockwork muse: The predictability of artistic change. New York: Basic.

Simonton

D. K.

(1999). Origins of genius. New York: Oxford.

Weisberg

R. W.

(1993). Creativity: Beyond the myth of genius. New York: Freeman.

Weisberg

R. W.

(1994). Genius and madness? A quasi-experimental test of the hypothesis that manic-depression increases creativity. Psychological Science, 5, 361–367.

10.

Weisberg

R. W.

(1999). Creativity and knowledge: A challenge to theories. In Sternberg

R. J.

(Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 226–250). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

11.

Weisberg

R. W.

(2000). An edifice built on sand? Review of Origins of genius, by D. K. Simonton. Contemporary Psychology, 45, 589–593.