While Chapman University's six-year graduation rate has been increasing steadily in the last few years, the institution continues to seek better ways to retain its students. Accordingly, our attention has focused on trying to identify freshman students who are more likely to be retained and those who are likely to depart college prior to degree completion. Using the models developed by the Higher Education Research Institute (HERI), Chapman University's four- and six-year estimated degree completion rates were computed and compared to the actual rates. The four- and six-year estimated and actual degree completion rates differed by only 0.6 and 6.3 percentage points, respectively. The models presented by Astin and Oseguera (2002)1 allow us to explore a variety of student characteristics (i.e., gender, race/ethnicity, in- and out-of-state status, admit status, and GPA) when examining estimated and actual degree completion rates and provide us with an opportunity to take a proactive approach to student retention on our campus.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AndersonE. (1985). Forces influencing student persistence and achievement. In NoelL.LevitzR., D. Saluri, & Associates (Eds.), Increasing student retention (pp. 44–61). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
2.
AndersonE., & McGuireW. (2003). Key concepts and principles regarding college student persistence. In BrayntP. & CrockettD. (Eds.), 2003/2004 Workshop: Best Practices in Recruitment and Retention (pp. 98-B–99-B). Noel Levitz Inc.
3.
AstinA. W. (1991). Assessment for excellence: The philosophy and practice of assessment and evaluation in higher education. New York: American Council on Education.
4.
AstinA. W. (1993). What matters in college?: Four critical years revisited. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
5.
AstinA. W. (1984). Student involvement: A developmental theory for higher education. Journal of College Student Personnel, 25(4), 297–308.
6.
AstinA. W., & OsegueraL. (2002). Degree attainment rates at American colleges and universities. Los Angeles: Higher Education Research Institute, UCLA.
7.
BloseG. (1999). Modeled retention and graduation rates: Calculating expected retention and graduation rates for multi-campus university system. In GaitherG. (Ed.), Promising practices in recruitment, remediation, and retention: New directions for higher education (p. 108). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
8.
BraxtonJ.SullivanA. S., & JohnsonR. (1997). Appraising Tinto's theory of college student departure. In SmartJ. (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (pp. 107–164). New York: Agathon Press.
9.
CabreraA.CastanedaM.NoraA., & HengstlerD. (1992). The convergence between two theories of college persistence. Journal of Higher Education, 63(2), 143–164.
10.
Chapman University. (2001). The Chapman Plan. Orange, CA: Chapman University.
11.
KnightW. (2002). Toward a comprehensive model of influences upon time to bachelor's degree attainment. Association for Institutional Research (AIR) Professional File, 85, 1–20.
12.
LevitzR.NoelL., & RitcherB. (1999). Strategic moves for retention success. In GaitherG. (Ed.), Promising practices in recruitment, remediation, and retention (p. 108). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
13.
MilamJ., & BergerJ. (1996). A modified model of college student persistence: Exploring the relationship between Astin's theory of involvement and Tinto's theory of student departure. Journal of College Student Development, 38(4), 387–400.
14.
OliverM.RodriguezC., & MickelsonR. (1985). Brown and black in white: The social adjustment and academic performance of Chicano and Black students in a predominantly White university. The Urban Review, 17(1), 3–24.
15.
PascarellaE., & TerenziniP. (1991). How college affects students: Findings and insights from twenty years of research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
16.
ReasomR. (2003). Student variables that predict retention: Recent research and new developments. NASPA Journal, 40, 172–191.
17.
RendonL.JalomoR., & NoraA. (2000). Theoretical considerations in the study of minority student retention in higher education. In BraxtonJ. (Ed.), Reworking the student departure puzzle (pp. 127–156). Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press.
18.
SwailW.ReddK.PernaL., & WaltonM. (2002, June). Retaining minority students in higher education: A framework for success. Paper presented at the Association for Institutional Research Conference, Toronto, Ontario.
19.
TierneyW. (1992). An anthropological analysis of student participation in college. Journal of Higher Education, 63(6), 603–618.
20.
TintoV. (1985). Dropping out and other forms of withdrawal from college. In NoelL.LevitzR., D. Saluri, & Associates (Eds.), Increasing student retention (pp. 28–43). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
21.
TintoV. (1987). Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
22.
TintoV. (1993). Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
23.
Upcraft, M., Gardner, J., & Associates. (1989). The freshman year experience. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
24.
VelasquezP. (1997). Cultural activities and campus involvement. Washington, DC: NCEOA, National TRIO Clearinghouse.
25.
WetzelJ.O'TooleD., & PetersonS. (1999). Factors affecting student retention probabilities: A case study. Journal of Economics and Finance, 23(1), 45–55.
