This study explored an initiative that created a pervasive learning environment in a middle school in South Korea and examined its impact on student academic achievement and learning engagement. Forty students received a laptop to use for class projects, online collaboration, and lesson reviews over a 3-year period. To measure the effect of laptop use, data were collected from surveys, test scores, interviews with students, and teacher reflections. The findings indicate that students demonstrated greater learning engagement, but no significant difference was found in test scores between students who had been given laptops and those who had not. Moreover, student engagement decreased as the novelty effect waned, while the number of students who used laptops inappropriately (e.g., playing online games during class) increased as the project progressed. Detailed explanations for this lack of influence on learning and decreased engagement are provided.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
CarspeckenP. F. (1996). Critical ethnography in educational research. New York: Routledge.
2.
ChoudrieJ.LeeH. (2004). Broadband development in South Korea: Institutional and cultural factors. European Journal of Information Systems, 14(4), 103–114.
3.
DunleavyM.HeineckeW. F. (2007). The impact of 1:1 laptop use on middle school math and science standardized test scores. Computers in the Schools, 24(3/4), 7–22.
4.
FraenkelJ. R.WallenN. E. (2006). How to design and evaluate research in education (6th ed.). Boston: McGraw-Hill.
5.
GulekJ. C.DemirtasH. (2005). Learning with technology: The impact of laptop use on student achievement. The Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 3(2), 5–38.
6.
HurJ.BrushT. (2009). Teacher participation in online communities: Why do teachers want to participate in self-generated online communities of K-12 teachers?Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 41(3), 279–303.
7.
KearsleyG.ShneidermanB. (1998). Engagement theory: A framework for technology-based teaching and learning. Educational Technology, 38(5), 20–23.
8.
Korea Education and Research Information Service (KERIS). (2005). Adapting education to the information age: A white paper. Ministry of Education and Human Resources Development & Korea Education and Research Information Service.
9.
KimS.LeeJ. (2010). Private tutoring and demand for education in South Korea. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 58(2), 259–296.
10.
KimJ.LeeJ.LeeS. (2005). Understanding of education fever in Korea. KEDI Journal of Educational Policy, 2(1), 7–15.
11.
LartigueC. J. (2000, May 28). You'll never guess what South Korea frowns upon. Washington Post, p. A1.
12.
LeeC. J. (2005). Korean education fever and private tutoring. KEDI Journal of Educational Policy, 2(1), 99–107.
13.
LowtherD. L.RossS. M.MorrisonG. M. (2003). When each one has one: The influences on teaching strategies and student achievement of using laptops in the classroom. Educational Technology Research & Development, 51(3), 23–44.
14.
MabryL.SnowJ. Z. (2006). Laptops for high-risk students: Empowerment and personalization in a standards-based learning environments. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 32(4), 289–316.
15.
McGrailE. (2006). “It's a double-edged sword, this technology business”: Secondary English teachers' perspectives on schoolwide laptop technology initiative. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1055–1079.
16.
MerriamS. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
17.
MilesM. B.HubermanA. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
18.
OliverK.CornJ. O. (2008). Student-reported differences in technology use and skills after the implementation of one-to-one computing. Educational Media International, 45(3), 215–229.
19.
PenuelW. R. (2006). Implementation and effects of 1:1 computing initiatives: A research synthesis. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 38(3), 329–348.
20.
RockmanS. (2003, Fall). Learning from laptops. Threshold Magazine, 1(1), 24–28.
21.
RosenheckL. (2008). Learning with ubiquitous computing. Educational Technology, 48(2), 5–10.
22.
RussellD. W.LucasK. B.McRobbieC. J. (2004). Role of the microcomputer-based laboratory display in supporting the construction of new understandings in thermal physics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(2), 165–185.
23.
RussellM.BebellD.HigginsJ. (2004). Laptop learning: A comparison of teaching and learning in upper elementary classrooms equipped with shared carts of laptops and permanent 1:1 laptops. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 30(4), 313–330.
24.
SilvernailD. L.LaneD. M. M. (2004). The impact of Maine's one-to-one laptop program on middle school teachers and students. Maine Education Policy Research Institute & University of Southern Maine Office.
25.
SilvernailD. L.GritterA. K. (2007). Maine's middle school laptop program: Creating better writers, research brief. Gorham, ME: Maine Education Policy Research Institute.
26.
SolensenC. W. (1994). Success and education in South Korea. Comparative Education Review, 38(1), 10–35.
27.
Texas Center for Educational Research (TCER). (2008). Evaluation of the Texas technology immersion pilot: Outcomes for the third year (2006–07). Austin, Texas.
28.
TrimmelM.BachmannJ. (2004). Cognitive, social, motivational and health aspects of students in laptop classrooms. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 20(1), 151–158.
WindschitlM.SahlK. (2002). Tracing teachers' use of technology in a laptop computer school: The interplay of teacher beliefs, social dynamics, and institutional culture. American Educational Research Journal, 39(1), 165–205.
31.
ZhouM.KimS. S. (2006). Community forces, social capital and educational achievement: Education in the Chinese and Korean immigrant communities. Harvard Education Review, 76(1), 1–29.
32.
ZuckerA.LightD. (2009). Laptop programs for students. Science, 323(5910), 82–85.
33.
ZuckerA. A.McGheeR. (2005). A study of one-to-one computer use in mathematics and science instruction at the secondary level in Henrico county public schools. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.
