This study investigated relationships among students' technology-related abilities, beliefs, and intentions. Participants were 217 preservice teachers who responded to post-course surveys. Value beliefs were the best predictor of their intentions to use a variety of software and their intentions regarding frequency of technology use with students in their future classrooms. Self-efficacy for technology integration also contributed to the prediction of intentions to use a variety of software, and technological abilities contributed to the prediction of intentions regarding frequency of future technology use. Constructivist beliefs were moderately correlated with self-efficacy and value beliefs, as well as with both types of intentions. The results highlight the importance of relationships between preservice teachers' beliefs and their potential integration of technology in their future classrooms.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AjzenI.MaddenT. J. (1986). Prediction of goal-directed behavior: Attitudes, intentions, and perceived behavioral control. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 22, 453–474. doi: 10.1016/0022-1031(86)90045-4
2.
AlbionP. R. (2001). Some factors in the development of self-efficacy beliefs for computer use among teacher education students. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 9(3), 321–347. Retrieved from http://www.editlib.org/p/8368
AndersonS. E.GroulxJ. G.ManingerR. M. (2010). The impact of educational technology coursework on preservice teachers' technology-related abilities, beliefs, and intentions. Texas Association of Teacher Educator's Forum, 35, 16–27.
5.
AndersonS. E.ManingerR. M. (2007). Preservice teachers' abilities, beliefs, and intentions regarding technology integration. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 37(2), 151–172. doi: 10.2190/H1M8-562W-18J1-634P
6.
BanduraA. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
7.
BeckerH. J. (2000, July). Findings from the teaching, learning, and computing survey: Is Larry Cuban right? Revision of paper presented at the School Technology Leadership Conference of the Council of Chief State School Officers, Washington, DC. Retrieved from http://www.crito.uci.edu/tlc/findings/ccsso.pdf
8.
BenjaminJ. (2003, April). Revision and validation of the revised teacher beliefs survey. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association conference, Chicago, IL. Retrieved from ERIC database. (ED476126)
9.
BirchA.IrvineV. (2009). Preservice teachers' acceptance of ICT integration in the classroom: Applying the UTAUT model. Educational Media International, 46(4), 295–315. doi: 10.1080/09523980903387506
ChenR. (2010). Investigating models of preservice teachers' use of technology to support student-centered learning. Computers & Education, 55(1), 32–42. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2009.11.015
12.
CompeauD.HigginsC. A.HuffS. (1999). Social Cognitive Theory and individual reactions to computing technology: A longitudinal study. MIS Quarterly, 23(2), 145–158. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/249749
13.
CzerniakC. M.LumpeA. T.HaneyJ. J.BeckJ. (1999). Teachers' beliefs about using technology in the science classroom. International Journal of Educational Technology, 1(2), 1–18. Retrieved from http://www.ascilite.org.au/ajet/ijet/vln2/czerniak/
14.
DavisF. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/249008
ErtmerP. A. (2005). Teacher pedagogical beliefs: The final frontier in our quest for technology integration?Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(4), 1042–1629. Retrieved from http://www.springerlink.com/content/26736pvw54484187/
17.
ErtmerP.RossE.GopalakrishnanS. (2000). Technology-using teachers: How powerful visions and student-centered beliefs fuel exemplary practice. Proceedings of Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference 2000 (pp. 1519–1524). Chesapeake, VA: AACE. Retrieved from http://www.editlib.org/p/8949
18.
FranklinC. A. (2007). Factors that influence elementary teachers' use of computers. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 15(2), 267–293. Retrieved from http://www.editlib.org/p/19833
19.
HermansR.TondeurJ.van BraakJ.ValckeM. (2008). The impact of primary school teachers' educational beliefs on classroom use of computers. Computers & Education, 51, 1499–1509. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2008.02.001
20.
Hernandez-RamosP. (2005). If not here, where? Understanding teachers' use of technology in Silicon Valley schools. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 38(1), 39–64. Retrieved from http://www.eric.ed.gov/PDFS/EJ719937.pdf
21.
HsuS. (2010). The relationship between teacher's technology integration ability and usage. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 43(3), 309–325. doi: 10.2190/EC.43.3.c
22.
JudsonE. (2006). How teachers integrate technology and their beliefs about learning: Is there a connection?Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 14(3), 581–597. Retrieved from http://www.editlib.org/p/6046
23.
KayR. H. (2006). Evaluating strategies used to incorporate technology into preservice education: A review of the literature. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 38(4), 383–408. Retrieved from http://www.eric.ed.gov/PDFS/EJ768720.pdf
24.
KellenbergerD. W. (1996). Preservice teachers' perceived computer self-efficacy based on achievement and value beliefs within a motivational framework. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 29, 124–140.
25.
KellenbergerD. W. (1997). Predicting preservice teacher perceived computer use under differential access to resources. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 16(1), 53–64. doi: 10.2190/RTYK-Y31F-R619-HWVY
26.
KellerJ. M. (1983). Motivational design of instruction. In ReigeluthC. M. (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models: An overview of their current status (pp. 383–434). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
27.
MaW. W.AnderssonR.StreithK. (2005). Examining user acceptance of computer technology: An empirical study of student teachers. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21(6), 387–395. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2005.00145.x
28.
MartinW.ShulmanS. (2006). Intel teach essentials instructional practices and classroom use of technology survey report. Retrieved from http://www.eric.ed.gov/PDFS/ED494013.pdf
29.
NegishiM.ElderA. D.HamilJ. B.MzoughiT. (2003, November). Predicting elementary education candidates' technology integration during their field placement instruction. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Mid-South Educational Research Association, Biloxi, MI. Retrieved from ERIC database. (ED482550)
30.
NiederhauserD. S.PerkmenS. (2008). Validation of the intrapersonal technology integration scale: Assessing the influence of intrapersonal factors that influence technology integration. Computers in the Schools, 25(1), 98–111. doi: 10.1080/07380560802157956
31.
NiederhauserD. S.StoddartT. (2001). Teachers' instructional perspectives and use of educational software. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17, 15–31. doi: 10.1016/S0742-051X(00)00036-6
32.
NorrisC.SolowayE. (2000, July). The snapshot survey service: A web site for assessing teachers' and administrators' technology activities, beliefs, and needs. Paper presented at the Secretary's Conference on Educational Technology 2000. Retrieved from http://www.ed.gov/rschstat/eval/tech/techconf00/cathienorris.pdf
PintrichP. R. (1990). Implications of psychological research on student learning and college teaching for teacher education. In HoustonW. R. (Ed.), Handbook of research on teacher education (pp. 826–857). New York: Macmillan.
35.
PopeM.HareD.HowardE. (2005). Enhancing technology use in student teaching: A case study. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 13(4), 573–618. Retrieved from http://www.editlib.org/p/4755
RoppM. M. (1999). Exploring individual characteristics associated with learning to use computers in preservice teacher preparation. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 31(4), 402–424.
38.
RakesG. C.FlowersB. F.CaseyH. B.SantanaR. (1999). An analysis of instructional technology use and constructivist behaviors in K-12 teachers. International Journal of Educational Technology, 1(2), 1–18. Retrieved from http://www.ascilite.org.au/ajet/ijetvln2/rakes/
39.
SallehS.AlbionP. (2004). Using the theory of planned behavior to predict Bruneian teachers' intentions to use ICT in teaching. Proceedings of the Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference 2004 (pp. 1389–1396). Chesapeake, VA: AACE. Retrieved from http://www.editlib.org/p/13671
40.
SangG.ValckeMvan BraakJ.TondeurJ. (2010). Student teachers' thinking processes and ICT integration: Predictors of prospective teaching behaviors with educational technology. Computers & Education, 54, 103–112. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2009.07.010
41.
ShiueY. (2007). Investigating the sources of teachers' instructional technology use through the decomposed Theory of Planned Behavior. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 36(4), 425–453. doi: 10.2190/A407-22RR-50X6-2830
42.
SmarkolaC. (2007). Technology acceptance predictors among student teachers and experienced classroom teachers. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 37(1), 65–82. doi: 10.2190/J3GM-3RK1-2907-7U03
43.
TeoT. (2009). Modeling technology acceptance in education: A study of pre-service teachers. Computers & Education, 52, 302–312. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2008.08.006
44.
TeoT.LuanW. S.SingC. C. (2008). A cross-cultural examination of the intention to use technology between Singaporean and Malaysian pre-service teachers: An application of the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 11(4), 265–280. Retrieved from http://www.ifets.info/journals/11_4/19.pdf
45.
TopperA. (2004). How are we doing? Using self-assessment to measure changing teacher technology literacy within a graduate educational technology program. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 12(3), 303–317. Retrieved from http://www.editlib.org/p/11464
46.
VenkateshV.MorrisM. G.DavisG. B.DavisF. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478. Retrieved from http://aisel.aisnet.org/misq/vol27/iss3/5/
47.
WuW.ChangH.GuoC. (2008). An empirical assessment of science teachers' intentions toward technology integration. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 27(4), 499–520. Retrieved from http://www.editlib.org/p/25231
48.
WrightV. H.WilsonE. K. (2005–2006). From preservice to inservice teaching: A study of technology integration. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 22(2), 49–55. Retrieved from http://www.eric.ed.gov/PDFS/EJ876902.pdf
49.
YuenA.MaW. (2002). Gender differences in teacher computer acceptance. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 10(3), 365–382. Retrieved from http://www.editlib.org/p/15142
