The development of social capital in young people is positively associated with educational attainment, achievement, and psychosocial factors. Prior research has explored factors that contribute to social capital, such as offline social networks. To a lesser extent, studies have analyzed the relationship between online social networks and students' social capital. However, educational researchers have yet to examine this relationship among students from low-income families. It is especially important to consider low-income students since historically they have not reached the same educational attainment and achievement levels as their higher income peers. In this article, we conduct a regression analysis on survey responses from high school students from low-income families (n = 607) to examine the relationship between intensity of online social network site use, social capital, and other measures of psychological well-being. Results suggest positive associations between use of online social network sites and two forms of social capital. Qualitative data were also utilized to illuminate low income students' opportunities or barriers for forging and sustaining relationships through online social network sites and implications for future research and education are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BarghJ.McKennaK. Y., & FitzsimonsG. M. (2002). Can you see the real me? Activation of and expression of “true self” on the Internet. Journal of Social Issues, 58(1), 33–48.
2.
BarronB. (2006). Interest and self-sustained learning as catalysts of development: A learning ecologies perspective. Human Development, 49, 193–224.
3.
BennettS.MatonK., & KervinL. (2008). The digital natives debate: A critical review of the evidence. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(5), 775–786.
4.
BourdieuP.PasseronJ. C., & NiceR. (1990). Reproduction in education, society, and culture. New York: Sage.
BoydD. M., & EllisonN. B. (2007). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), article 11. Retrieved from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol13/issue1/boyd.ellison.html
7.
BransfordJ. D.BrownA. L., & CockingP. R. (Eds.). (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Research Council/National Academy Press.
ColemanJ. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, S95–S120.
10.
DienerE.SuhE., & OishiS. (1997). Recent findings on subjective well-being. Indian Journal of Clinical Psychology, 24, 25–41.
11.
DikaS. L., & SinghK. (2002). Applications of social capital in educational literature: A critical synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 72(1), 31–60.
12.
DonathJ., & BoydD. (2004). Public displays of connection. BT Technology Journal, 22(4), 71–82.
13.
Douglas-HallA.ChauM., & KoballH. (2006). Basic facts about low-income children: Birth to age18. New York: National Center for Children in Poverty.
14.
DykP. H., & WilsonS. M. (1999). Family-based social capital considerations as predictors of attainments among Appalachian youth. Sociological Inquiry, 69(3), 477–503.
15.
EllisonN. B.SteinfieldC., & LampeC. (2007). The benefits of facebook “friends”: Social capital and college students' use of online social network sites. Journal of ComputerMediated Communication, 12(4), article 1. http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol12/issue4/ellison.html
16.
GranovetterM. (1973). The strength of weak ties. The American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360–1380.
17.
GreenhowC. (2010). The role of youth as cultural producers in a niche social network site. New Directions in Youth Development: Theory, Research & Practice, 128, 55–64
18.
GreenhowC. (2011). Online social networks and learning. On the Horizon, 15(1), 4–12.
19.
GreenhowC., & RobeliaB. (2009a). Informal learning and identity formation in online social networks. Learning, Media and Technology, 34(2), 119–140. Retrieved September 1, 2011 from http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17439880902923580
ItoM.BaumerS.BittantiM.BoydD.CodyR.Herr-StephensonB. (2009). Hanging out, messing around, geeking out: Kids living and learning with new media. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
LenhartA.MaddenM., & HitlinP. (2005). Teens and technology. Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project.
31.
LenhartA.PurcellK.SmithA., & ZickuhrK. (2010, February 10). Social media and young adults. Washington, DC: Pew Charitable Trusts. Retrieved July 14, 2010, from http://pewinternet.org
32.
LinN. (1999). Building a network theory of social capital. Connections, 22(1), 28–51.
33.
LittleR. J. A., & RubinD. B. (1987). Statistical analysis with missing data. New York: Wiley.
34.
LivingstoneS.BoberM., & HelsperE. (2005). Internet literacy among children and young people: Findings from the UK Children Go Online Project. London: London School of Economics. Retrieved February 1, 2009 from http://www.children-go-online.net
35.
MerchantG. H. (2010). View my profile(s). In AlvermannD. (Ed.), Adolescents' online literacies (pp. 51–70). New York: Peter Lang.
36.
MorganS., & SorensonA. (1999). Parental networks, social closure, and mathematical learning: A test of Coleman's social capital explanation of school effects. American Sociological Review, 64, 661–681.
37.
MorrowV. (1999). Conceptualizing social capital in relation to the well-being of children and young people: A critical review. The Sociological Review, 47(4), 744–765.
38.
MullerC., & EllisonC. G. (2001). Religious involvement, social capital, and adolescents academic progress: Evidence from the National Educational Longitudinal Study of 1988. Sociological Focus, 34(2), 155–183.
39.
National School Board Association. (2007, July). Creating and connecting: Research and guidelines on social—and educational—networking. Retrieved September 22, 2008, from www.nsba.org/SecondaryMenu/TLN/CreatingandConnecting.aspx
40.
NieN. H. (2001). Sociability, interpersonal relations, and the Internet: Reconciling conflicting findings. American Behavioral Scientist, 45, 420–435.
41.
PribeshS., & DowneyD. B. (1999). Why are residential and school moves associated with poor school performance?Demography, 36(4), 521–534.
42.
PutnamR. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon & Schuster.
43.
RideoutV. J.FoehrU. G., & RobertsD. F. (2010). Generation M2: Media in the lives of 8- to 18-year-olds. Menlo Park, CA: Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation. Retrieved on January 19, 2010 from http://www.kff.org/entmedia/8010.cfm
44.
RobeliaB.GreenhowC., & BurtonL. (2011). Adopting environmentally responsible behaviors: How learning within a social networking application motivated students to act for the environment. Environmental Education Research, 17(4), 553–575.
45.
RosenbergM. (1989). Society and the adolescent self-image (rev. ed.). Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press.
46.
SalawayG.BorresonJ., & NelsonM. R. (2008). The ECAR study of undergraduate students and information technology, 2008 (Vol. 8). Boulder, CO: Educause (Educause Center for Applied Research).
47.
SteinfieldC.EllisonN., & LampeC. (2008). Social captial, self-esteem, and use of online social network sites: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 29(6), 434–445.
48.
SteinkuehlerC. & WilliamsD. (2006). Where everybody knows your (screen) name: Online games as “Third Places.”Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11(4), article 1.
49.
St. JohnE. P. (2000). The access challenge: Rethinking the causes of the new inequality. Policy Issue Report #2000–01. Indiana University Education Policy Center, Bloomington, IN.
50.
Tallent-RunnelsM. K.ThomasJ. A.LanW. Y., & CooperS. (2006). Teaching courses online: A review of the research. Review of Educational Research, 76(1), 93–135.
51.
TintoV. (1998). Colleges as communities: Taking research on student persistence seriously. Review of Higher Education, 21(2), 167–177.
52.
ValenzuelaS.ParkN., & KeeK. F. (2009). Is there social capital in a social network site?: Facebook use and college students' life satisfaction, trust, and participation. Journal of Computer-mediated Communication, 14, 875–901.
53.
WellmanB. (2001). Computer networks as social networks. Science, 293, 2031–2034.
54.
WellmanB.KokuE., & HunsingerJ. (2006). Networked scholarship. In WeissJ.NolanJ.HunsingerJ., & TrifonasP. (Eds.), The international handbook of virtual learning environments. New York: Springer.
55.
ZandbergI.LewisL., & GreeneB. (2008). Technology-based distance education courses for public elementary and secondary school students: 2002–2003 and 2004–2005. (NCES 2008–008). U.S. Department of Education. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics. Retrieved May 30, 2009, from http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2008/2008008.pdf
56.
ZhaoC., & KuhG. D. (2004). Added value: Learning communities and student engagement. Research in Higher Education, 45(2), 115–138.
