Researchers question how and what students learn from commercial digital games. Using a concurrent mixed-methods approach, this study examined 30 students' construction of knowledge and skills while playing a commercial off-the-shelf game for 7 weeks. Quantitative data included students' background survey and pre- and post-assessments for knowledge and motivation. Qualitative data included students log sheets to document their progress of play through the game, videotaped interviews after each playing session as well as videotaped game sessions. Analysis indicates that two main play strategies were used during the process of learning—explorers or goal seekers. Both player types were able to statistically significantly gain disciplinary knowledge and skills, but only explorers significantly valued the learning.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AmesC. (1992). Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation. [Peer Reviewed Empirical]. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(3), 261–271.
2.
AndermanE. M., & WoltersC. A. (2006). Goals, values, and affect: Influences on student motivation. In AlexanderP. A. & WinneP. H. (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (2nd ed., pp. 369–389). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
3.
AndersonC. A., & DillK. E. (2000). Video games and aggressive thoughts, feelings, and behavior in the laboratory and in life. [Empirical]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(4), 772–790.
4.
AndersonC. A., & FordC. M. (1986). Affect of the game player: Short-term effects of highly and mildly aggressive video games. Personal and Social Psychology Bulletin, 12(4), 390–402.
5.
ApperleyT. H. (2006). Genre and game studies: Toward a critical approach to video game genres. Simulation Gaming, 37(1), 6–23.
6.
AsgariM. (2005). A three-factor model of motivation and game design. Paper presented at the 2005 International DiGRA Conference, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
7.
AsgariM., & KaufmanD. (2005). Relationships among computer games, fantasy, and learning. Paper presented at the 2005 International DiGRA Conference, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
8.
BarabS. A.BransfordJ. D.GreenoJ. G., & GeeJ. P. (2007). Embodied cognition: A more meaningful ontological unit. Paper presented at the 2007 AERA Annual Meeting.
9.
BarabS. A.HayK. E.BarnettM., & SquireK. (2001). Constructing virtual worlds: Tracing the historical development of learner practices. Cognition and Instruction, 19(1), 47–94.
10.
BarabS. A.ZuikerS.WarrenS.HickeyD.Ingram-GobleA.KwonE.-J. (in press). Situationally embodied curriculum: Relating formalism and contexts. [Empirical]. Science Education.
11.
BartleR. (2006). Hearts, clubs, diamonds, spades: Players who suit MUDs. In SalenK. & ZimmermanE. (Eds.), The game design reader (pp. 754–787). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
12.
BartlettC. P.AndersonC. A., & SwingE. L. (2009). Video game effects—Confirmed, suspected, and speculative: A review of the evidence. [Conceptual]. Simulation & Gaming, 40(3), 377–403.
13.
BeckettK. L., & ShafferD. W. (2005). Augmented by reality: The pedagogical praxis of urban planing as a pathway to ecological thinking. [Empirical Research]. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 33(1), 31–52.
14.
BransfordJ. D., & SchwartzD. L. (1999). Chapter 3: Rethinking transfer: A simple proposal with multiple implications. Review of Research in Education, 24(1), 61–100.
15.
BrophyJ. E. (2004). Motivating students to learn (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
16.
BrophyJ. E. (2008). Developing students' appreciation for what is taught in school. Educational Psychologist, 43(3), 132–141.
17.
BrownA. L. (1994). The advancement of learning. Educational Researcher, 23(8), 4–12.
18.
CallejaG. (2007). Digital game involvement: A conceptual model. [Empirical]. Games and Culture, 2(3), 236–260.
19.
CharmazK. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. London: Sage.
20.
De AguileraM., & MendizA. (2003). Video games and education (education in the face of a “parallel school”). ACM Computers in Entertainment, 1(1), 1–14.
21.
DeciE. L.EghrariH.PatrickB. C., & LeoneD. R. (1994). Facilitating internalization: The self-determination theory perspective. [Empirical]. Journal of Personality, 62(1), 119–142.
22.
Egenfeldt-NielsenS. (2005). Beyond edutainment: Exploring the educational potential of computer games. Unpublished dissertation, IT-University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
23.
Entertainment Software Association. (2009). Essential facts about the computer and video game industry: 2009 sales, demographic and usage data (Report).
FletcherJ. D., & TobiasS. (2006). Using computer games and simulations for instruction: A research review. Paper presented at the Society for Applied Learning Technology Meeting: New Learning Technologies, Orlando, FL.
FosterA., & MishraP. (2009a). Disciplinary knowledge construction while playing a simulation strategy game. Paper presented at the Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, Charleston, SC.
28.
FosterA., & MishraP. (2009b). Games, claims, genres & learning. In FerdigR. E. (Ed.), Handbook of research on effective electronic gaming in education. Information Science Reference.
29.
FosterA. N. (2008). Games and motivation to learn science: Personal identity, applicability, relevance and meaningfulness. [Conceptual]. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 19(4), 597–614.
30.
GalarneauL. (2005). Authentic learning experiences through play: Games, simulations and the construction of knowledge. Paper presented at the 2005 International DiGRA Conference, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
31.
GardnerH. (2007). Five minds for the future. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
32.
GarrisR.AhlersR., & DriskellJ. E. (2002). Games, motivation, and learning: A research and practice model. Simulation and Gaming, 33(4), 441–467.
33.
GeeJ. P. (2003). What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
34.
GeeJ. P. (2007a). Good video games + good learning: Collected essays on video games, learning and literacy. New York: Peter Lang Publishing, Inc.
35.
GeeJ. P. (2007b). Video games and embodiment. Paper presented at the 2007 AERA Annual meeting.
36.
GlaserB. G., & StraussA. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
37.
GrantH., & DweckC. S. (2003). Clarifying achievement goals and their impact. [Peer Reviewed Empirical]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(3), 541–553.
38.
GreenoJ. G. (1997). On claims that answer the wrong questions. [Response Theoretical]. Educational Researcher, 26(1), 5–17.
39.
GreenoJ. G. (2007). Notes on embodied cognition for AERA 2007. Paper presented at the 2007 AERA Annual Meeting.
40.
GreenoJ. G.CollinsA. M., & ResnickL. B. (1996). Cognition and learning. In BerlinerD. C. & CalfeeR. C. (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology. New York: Simon & Schuster Macmillan.
41.
GrosB. (2007). Digital games in education: The design of games-based learning environments. [Conceptual]. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 40(1), 23–38.
42.
HeeterC. (2009). Play styles and learning. In FerdigR. (Ed.), Handbook of research on effective electronic gaming in education (Vol. 2, pp. 826–846). Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference.
43.
JenkinsH. (2006). Convergence culture: Where old and new media collide. New York: New York University Press.
44.
JohnsonS. (2005). Everything bad is good for you: How today's popular culture is actually making us smarter. New York: Penguin Group.
45.
KirriemuirJ., & McFarlaneA. (2004). Literature review in games and learning (No. 8). Bristol, Canada: Nesta Futurelab.
MaloneT. W. (1981). Toward a theory of intrinsically motivating instruction. [Intrinsic Motivation and Games]. Cognitive Science, 5(4), 333–369.
48.
MaloneT. W., & LepperM. R. (1987). Making learning fun: A taxonomy of intrinsic motivations for learning. In SnowR. E. & FarrM. J. (Eds.), Aptitude, learning and instruction. Volume 3: Cognitive and affective processed analysis. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
49.
MarkusH., & NuriusP. (1986). Possible selves. [Peer-Reviewed]. American Psychologist, 41(9), 954–969.
50.
MishraP., & FosterA. (2007). The claims of games: A comprehensive review and directions for future research. In CrawfordC.WillisD. A.CarlsenR.GibsonI.McFerrinK.PriceJ., & WeberR. (Eds.), Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education: 2007 18th International Conference (Vol. 2007, pp. 2227–2232). San Antonio, TX: Chesapeake, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).
51.
MitchellA., & Savill-SmithC. (2004). The use of computer and video games for learning: A review of the literature. London: Learning and Skills Development Agency.
52.
National Council for the Social Studies. (1994). Expectations of excellence: Curriculum standards for social studies. Silver Spring, MD: NCSS Publications.
53.
National Council on Economics Education. (2005). Voluntary national content standards in economics. New York: National Council on Economics Education.
54.
National Research Council. (2005). Advancing scientific research in education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
55.
PhillipsD. C., & SoltisJ. F. (1998). Perspectives on learning (3rd ed.). New York: Teachers College Press.
56.
RandelJ.MorrisB.WetzelC., & WhitehillB. (1992). The effectiveness of games for educational purposes: A reviews of recent research. [Review of Research]. Simulation and Gaming, 23(3), 261–276.
57.
RideoutV.FoehrU. G., & RobertsD. F. (2010). Generation M2: Media in the lives of 8 to 18-year olds (Report). Menlo Park, CA.
58.
RoeK., & MuijsD. (1998). Children and computer games: A profile of the heavy user. European Journal of Communication, 13(2), 181–200.
59.
RowellP. M. (2002). Peer interactions in shared technological activity: A study of participation. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 12, 1–22.
60.
SchankR. C.BermanT. R., & MacPhersonK. A. (1999). Learning by doing. In ReigeluthC. M. (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory (Vol. II, pp. 161–181). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
61.
SchiefeleU.KrappA., & WintelerA. (1992). Interest as a predictor of academic achievement: A meta-analysis of research. In RenningerK. A.HidiS., & KrappA. (Eds.), The role of interest in learning and development (pp. 183–212). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
62.
SchrawG.FlowerdayT., & LehmanS. (2001). Increasing situational interest in the classroom. Educational Psychology Review, 13(3), 211–224.
63.
ShafferD. W. (2004). Pedagogical praxis: The professions as models for postindus-trialization. [Theoretical]. Teachers College Record, 106(7), 1401.
64.
ShafferD. W. (2006). How computer games help children learn. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
65.
ShafferD. W.SquireK.HalversonR., & GeeJ. P. (2005). Video games and the future of learning. [Conceptual]. Phi Delta Kappan, 87(2), 104–111.
66.
SquireK. (2002). Cultural framing of computer/video games. Game Studies: The International Journal of Computer Game Research, 2(1).
67.
SquireK. (2003). Video games in education. International Journal of Intelligent Simulations and Gaming, 2(1), 49–62.
68.
SquireK. (2004). Replaying history: Learning world history through playing civilization III. Unpublished dissertation, Indiana University.
69.
SteinkuehlerC. (2008). Massively multiplayer online games as an educational technology: An outline for research. Educational Technology, 48(1), 10–21.
StraussA., & CorbinJ. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. London: Sage.
72.
TurkleS. (1995). Life on the screen: Identity in the age of the internet. New York: Simon and Schuster.
73.
TurkleS. (1997). Seeing through computers: Education in a culture of simulation. [Games and Sims]. The American Prospect, 8(31), 76–82.
74.
WangS.-K. (2010). Effects of playing a history-simulation game: Romance of three kingdoms. [Empirical]. International Journal of Gaming and Computer-Mediated Simulations, 2(2), 36–56.
75.
WhiteheadA. N. (1929). The aims of education & other essays. New York: Macmillan.
76.
WhittonN. (2010). Game engagement theory and adult learning. [Conceptual]. Simulation & Gaming, 14, 1–14.
77.
WigfieldA., & EcclesJ. S. (2002). The development of competence beliefs, expectancies for success, and achievement values from childhood to adolescence. In WigfieldA. & EcclesJ. S. (Eds.), Development of achievement motivation: A volume in the educational psychology series (pp. 91–120). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
78.
WilliamsonK. M.LandL.ButlerB., & NdahiH. B. (2004). A structured framework for using games to teach mathematics and science in K-12 classrooms. The Technology Teacher, 64(3), 15–18.
79.
YeeN. (2006). The demographics, motivations and derived experiences of users of massively multi-user online graphical environments. [Empirical]. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 15(3), 309–329.
