Substantial evidence now supports pedagogical applications of virtual worlds; however, most research supporting virtual worlds for education has been conducted using researcher-developed Multi-User Virtual Environments (MUVE). Second Life (SL) is a MUVE that has been adopted by a large number of academic institutions; however, little research has systematically investigated the potential of using SL for higher education. A 2–year pilot study was conducted that included seven SL activities and a mixed-methods evaluation of the SL's affordances, challenges, and limitations. Three SL integration factors emerged, each with sub-factors: pedagogical (relevance, complexity of required SL skills, use of SL affordances); contextual (student prior gaming experience, activity duration, frequency of events); and logistical (SL usability, training, technical support, computer issues). A framework for creating SL instructional activities is presented using the factors.
BarabS.SadlerT.HeiseltC.HickeyD., & ZuikerS. (2007). Relating narrative, inquiry, and inscriptions: Supporting consequential play. Journal of Science Education & Technology, 16(1), 59–82.
3.
BarabS. A. & DedeC. (2007). Games and immersive participatory simulations for science education: An emerging type of curricula. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 16(1), 1–3.
4.
BoulosK.HetheringtonL., & WheelerS. (2007). Second Life: An overview of the potential of 3–D virtual worlds in medical and health education. Health Information and Libraries Journal, 24(4), 233–245.
5.
BrunerJ. S. (1961). The act of discovery. Harvard Educational Review, 31(1): 21–32.
Clarke-MiduraJ.MayrathM., & DedeC. (2010). Designing Immersive Virtual Environments for Assessing Inquiry. American Education Research Association Conference, 2010. Denver, Colorado.
8.
ConklinM. S. (2007, February). 101 Uses for Second Life in the College Classroom. Second Life Symposium at the Games, Learning, and Society Conference, June 23–24, 2005. Madison, WI. Retrieved July 25, 2008 http://facstaff.elon.edu/mconklin/pubs/glshandout.pdf
DedeC. (1995). The evolution of constructivist learning environments: Immersion in distributed virtual worlds. Educational Technology, 35(5), 46–52.
11.
DedeC. (2009, January 2). Immersive interface for engagement and learning. Science, 323, 66–69.
12.
DedeC.NelsonB.KetelhutD.ClarkeJ., & BowmanC. (2004). Design-based research strategies for studying situated learning in a multi-user virtual environment. Paper presented at the 2004 International Conference on Learning Sciences, Mahwah, NJ.
13.
EvertsS. (2007). Second Life science: Take a scientific field trip to a digital world. Chemical & Engineering News: Science & Technology, 85(26), 49–51.
14.
GeeJ. (2003) What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy.Palgrave Macmillan, New York.
15.
Global Kids. (2007). An Educational Non-profit's History of the Teen Grid: Global Kids' Adventure in Best Practices. Second Life Community Convention. Retrieved February 8th, 2009 from Best Practices Using Second Life for Real World Education: http://www.flickr.com/photos/holymeatballs/sets/72157601198270790/
16.
GredlerM. E. (2004). Games and simulations and their relationships to learning. In JonassenD. H. (Ed.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (pp. 571–582). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
17.
JarmonL. (2009). Learning in virtual world environments: Social-presence, engagement, & pedagogy. In Encyclopedia of Distance and Online Learning, RogersP. & BergG. (Eds.). New York: Information Science Reference.
18.
JarmonL.TraphaganT., & MayrathM. (2008). Understanding project-based learning in Second Life with a pedagogy, training, and assessment trio. Educational Media International45(3), 153–171. Routledge.
19.
JarmonL.TraphaganT.MayrathM., & TrivediA. (2009). Virtual world teaching, experiential learning, and assessment: An interdisciplinary communication course in Second Life. Computers & Education. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2009.01.010
20.
KafaiY. B. (2006). Playing and making games for learning: Instructionist and constructionist perspectives for game studies. Games and Culture, 1(1), 36–40.
21.
LepperM. R., & MaloneT. W. (1987). Intrinsic motivation and instructional effectiveness in computer based education.Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
22.
MayerR. (2005). The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
23.
MayrathM. (April, 2009). Identifying and measuring flow within a Second Life role-play activity. Poster presentation at American Educational Research Association (AERA). San Diego, CA.
24.
MayrathM.SanchezJ.TraphaganT.HeikesJ., & TrivediA. (2007, June). Using Second Life in an English Course: Designing Class Activities to Address Learning Objectives. Paper presented at ED-MEDIA World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia & Telecommunications, Vancouver, Canada.
NelsonB. C., & KetelhutD. J. (2007). Scientific inquiry in educational multi-user virtual environments. Educational Psychology Review19(3), 265–283.
27.
RitzemaT., & HarrisB. (2008). The use of Second Life for distance education. Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges, 23(6), 110–116.
28.
SanchezJ. (2007). Second Life: An interactive qualitative analysis. In CrawfordC. (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference 2007, pp. 1240–1243. Chesapeake, VA: AACE
29.
SaveryJ. R., & DuffyT. M. (1995). Problem based learning: An instructional model and its constructivist framework. Educational Technology, 35(5), 31–37.
30.
SquireK. (2003). Video games in education. International Journal of Intelligent Simulations and Gaming, 2(1), 49–62.
StraussA., & CorbinJ. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
33.
SwellerJ. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12(2), 257–285.
34.
YellowleesP., & CookJ. (2006). Education about hallucinations using an internet virtual reality system: A qualitative survey. Academic Psychiatry, 30, 534–539.
