The present study examined data from a large, nationally representative sample—the National Assessment of Adult Literacy (NCES, 2007)—to examine how computer use and Internet-based literacy practices (use of e-mail, searching for information on the Internet, and Internet chatting) were related to prose, document, and quantitative literacy scores. The moderating effects of gender and ethnicity with these practices were also assessed. Results indicated that, when controlling for potential confounding variables, the use of computers and engagement in Internet-based literacy practices was associated with higher scores on each of the three literacy tasks. Additionally, moderating effects were identified for gender and for ethnicity on several literacy tasks.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AttewellP. (2001). The first and second digital divides. Sociology of Education, 74, 252–259.
2.
BroosA. (2005). Gender and information and communication technologies (ICT) anxiety: Male self-assurance and female hesitation. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 8(1), 21–31.
FellegiI. P. (1980). Approximate tests of independence and goodness of fit based on stratified multistage samples. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 75, 261–268.
5.
JacksonL. A.von EyeA.BioccaF.BarbatsisG.ZhaoY., & FitzgeraldH. E. (2003, June 5–8). Children and Internet use: Findings from the HomeNetToo project. Presentation at the NSF-sponsored workshop on the “Domestic impact of information and communication technology.” Estes Park, CO.
6.
LarrisonC. R.NackerudL.RislerE., & SullivanM. (2002). Welfare recipients and the digital divide: Left out of the new economy?Journal of Technology in Human Services, 19(4), 1–12.
7.
LiuZ., & HuangX. (2008). Gender differences in the online reading environment. Journal of Documentation, 64(4), 616–626.
8.
LordF. M., & NovickM. R. (1968). Statistical theories of mental test scores.Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. National Center for Educational Statistics (NCES). (n.d.c). Key facts. Retrieved November 16, 2009 from http://nces.ed.gov/naal/kf_demographics.asp
9.
National Center for Educational Statistics (NCES). (2007). 2003 National Assessment of Adult Literacy: Public use data file user's guide. NCES 2007–464. U.S. Department of Education Institute for Educational Sciences. National Center for Educational Statistics (NCES). (n.d.a). What is NAAL? Retrieved November 16, 2009 from http://nces.ed.gov/naal/index.asp
NorrisP. (2001). Digital divide: Civic engagement, information poverty, and the internet worldwide.New York: Cambridge University Press.
12.
Pew Internet & American Life Project. (2009, January). Generations online in 2009.Washington, DC: Author.
13.
Pew Internet & American Life Project. (2003, April). The ever-shifting Internet population: A new look at Internet access and the digital divide.Washington, DC: Author.
14.
Pew Research Center for The People and The Press. (1999, January 14). Online newcomers more middle-brow, less work-oriented: The Internet news audience goes ordinary. Retrieved July 31, 2008 from http://people-press.org/dataarchive/form.php?DocID=56
SamejimaF. (1969). Estimation of latent ability using a response pattern of graded scores. Psychometric Monograph Supplement, No. 17.
17.
SamejimaF. (1997). Graded response model. In van der LindenW. J. & HambletonR. (Eds.), Handbook of modern item response theory.New York: Springer-Verlag.
18.
SchumacherP., & Morahan-MartinJ. (2001). Gender, internet, and computer attitudes and experiences. Computers in Human Behavior, 17, 95–110.
19.
SmithM. C. (1996). Differences in reading practices and literacy proficiencies among adults. Reading Research Quarterly, 31, 196–219.
20.
U.S. Census Bureau. (2005, October). Computer and internet use in the United States: 2003.Washington, DC: Author.
