Quality problems have long plagued the nursing home industry. While two-thirds of U.S. nursing homes are investor-owned, few studies have examined the impact of investor-ownership on the quality of care. The authors analyzed 1998 data from inspections of 13,693 nursing facilities representing virtually all U.S. nursing homes. They grouped deficiency citations issued by inspectors into three categories (“quality of care,” “quality of life,” and “other”) and compared deficiency rates in investor-owned, nonprofit, and public nursing homes. A multivariate model was used to control for case mix, percentage of residents covered by Medicaid, whether the facility was hospital-based, whether it was a skilled nursing facility for Medicare only, chain ownership, and location by state. The study also assessed nurse staffing. The authors found that investor-owned nursing homes provide worse care and less nursing care than nonprofit or public homes. Investor-owned facilities averaged 5.89 deficiencies per home, 46.5 percent higher than nonprofit and 43.0 percent higher than public facilities, and also had more of each category of deficiency. In the multivariate analysis, investor-ownership predicted 0.679 additional deficiencies per home; chain-ownership predicted an additional 0.633 deficiencies per home. Nurse staffing ratios were markedly lower at investor-owned homes.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
VladeckB. C.Unloving Care: The Nursing Home Tragedy.Basic Books, New York, 1980.
2.
MendelsonM. A.Tender Loving Greed.Random House, New York, 1974.
3.
U.S. General Accounting Office. California Nursing Homes: Care Problems Persist Despite Federal and State Oversight. Report to the Special Committee on Aging, U.S. Senate. GAO/HEHS-98–202. Washington, D.C., 1998.
4.
U.S. Office of the Inspector General, Department of Health and Human Services. Nursing Home Survey and Certification: Deficiency Trends. OEI-02–98–00331. Washington, D.C., 1999.
5.
U.S. General Accounting Office. Nursing Homes: Additional Steps Needed to Strengthen Enforcement of Federal Quality Standards. Report to the Special Committee on Aging, U.S. Senate. GAO/HEHS-99–46. Washington, D.C., 1999.
6.
HarringtonC.Nursing Facilities, Staffing, Residents, and Facility Deficiencies, 1991–97. Report prepared for the U.S. Health Care Financing Administration. University of California, San Francisco, 1999.
7.
KandaK., and MezeyM.Registered nurse staffing in Pennsylvania nursing homes: Comparison before and after implementation of Medicare's prospective payment system. Gerontologist31: 318–324, 1991.
8.
AaronsonW. E.ZinnJ. S., and RoskoM. D.Do for-profit and not-for-profit nursing homes behave differently?Gerontologist34(6): 775–786, 1994.
9.
SpectorW. D.SeldenT. M., and CohenJ. W.The impact of ownership type on nursing home outcomes. Health Econ.7: 639–653, 1998.
10.
DavisM. A.Nursing home ownership revisited: Market, cost, and quality relationships. Med. Care31: 1062–1068, 1993.
11.
HarringtonC.Nursing Home Staffing and Its Relationship to Deficiencies.Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, 1999.
12.
LinnM. W.GurelL., and LinnB. S.Patient outcome as a measure of quality of nursing home care. Am. J. Public Health67: 337–344, 1977.
13.
NymanJ. A.Improving the quality of nursing home outcomes: Are adequacy- or incentive-oriented policies more effective?Med. Care26: 1158–1171, 1988.
14.
MunroeD. J.The influence of registered nursing staffing on the quality of nursing home care. Res. Nurs. Health13: 263–270, 1990.
15.
CherryR. L.Agents of nursing home quality of care: Ombudsmen and staff ratios revisited. Gerontologist31: 302–308, 1991.
16.
SpectorW. D., and TakadaH. A.Characteristics of nursing homes that affect resident outcomes. J. Aging Health3: 427–454, 1991.
17.
BliesmerM. M.KaneR. L., and ShannonI.The relationships between nursing staffing levels and nursing home outcomes. J. Aging Health10: 351–371, 1998.
18.
CohenJ. W., and SpectorW. D.The effect of Medicaid reimbursement on quality of care in nursing homes. J. Health Econ.15: 23–28, 1996.
19.
ArlingG.Nursing home case mix. Med. Care25: 9–19, 1987.
20.
CohenJ. W., and DubayL. C.The effects of Medicaid reimbursement method and ownership on nursing home costs, case mix and staffing. Inquiry27: 183–200, 1990.
21.
FriesB. E.Refining a case-mix measure for nursing homes: Resources utilization groups (RUGS-III). Med. Care32: 668–685, 1994.
22.
HarringtonC.Nursing facility staffing in the states in the 1991–95 period. Med. Care Res. Rev.55: 334–363, 1998.
23.
BuchananR. J.MadelR. P., and PersonsD.Medicaid payment policies for nursing home care: A national survey. Health Care Fin. Rev.13(1): 55–72, 1991.
24.
CohenJ. W., and SpectorW. D.The effect of Medicaid reimbursement on quality of care in nursing homes. J. Health Econ.15: 23–28, 1996.
25.
ArlingG.NordquistR. H., and CapitmanJ. A.Nursing home cost and ownership type: Evidence of interaction effects. Health Serv. Res.22: 255–269, 1987.
26.
McKayN.The effect of chain ownership on nursing home costs. Health Serv. Res.26: 109–124, 1991.
27.
SAS Software Version 6.04.SAS Institute, Cary, N.C.
28.
ElwellF.The effects of ownership on institutional services. Gerontologist24(1): 77–83, 1984.
29.
American Association of Homes and Services for the Aging. Nursing Home Statistical Yearbook, 1998.Washington, D.C., 1999.
WoolhandlerS., and HimmelsteinD. U.When money is the mission—The high cost of investor-owned care. N. Engl. J. Med.341: 444–446, 1999.
45.
PattisonR. V., and KatzH. M.Investor-owned and not-for-profit hospitals: A comparison based on California data. N. Engl. J. Med.309: 347–353, 1983.
46.
PattisonR. V.Response to financial incentives among investor-owned and not-for-profit hospitals: An analysis based on California data, 1978–1982. In For-Profit Enterprise in Health Care, edited by GrayB. H., pp. 290–302. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C., 1986.
47.
WattJ. M.The comparative economic performance of investor-owned chain and not-for-profit hospitals. N. Engl. J. Med.314: 89–96, 1986.
48.
WattJ. M.The effects of ownership and multihospital system membership on hospital functional strategies and economic performance. In For-Profit Enterprise in Health Care, edited by GrayB. H., pp. 260–289. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C., 1986.
49.
GrayB. H., and McNerneyW. J.For-profit enterprise in health care. N. Engl. J. Med.314: 1523–1528, 1986.
50.
Committee on Implications of For-Profit Enterprises in Health Care. Investor ownership and the costs of medical care. In For-Profit Enterprise in Health Care, edited by GrayB. H., pp. 74–96. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C., 1986.
51.
ErmannD., and GabelJ.Investor-owned multihospital systems: A synthesis of research findings. In For-Profit Enterprise in Health Care, edited by GrayB. H., pp. 474–491. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C., 1986.
52.
CoelenC. G.Hospital ownership and comparative hospital costs. In For-Profit Enterprise in Health Care, edited by GrayB. H., pp. 322–353. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C., 1986.
53.
TaylorD. H.WhellanD. J., and SloanF. A.Effects of admission to a teaching hospital on the costs and quality of care for Medicare beneficiaries. N. Engl. J. Med.340: 293–299, 1999.
54.
WoolhandlerS., and HimmelsteinD. U.Costs of care and administration at for-profit and other hospitals in the United States. N. Engl. J. Med.336: 769–774, 1997.
55.
SilvermanE. M.SkinnerJ. S., and FisherE. S.The association between for-profit hospital ownership and increased Medicare spending. N. Engl. J. Med.341: 420–426, 1999.
56.
KovnerC., and GergenP.Nurse staffing levels and adverse events following surgery in U.S. hospitals. Image: J. Nurs. Scholarship30: 315–321, 1998.
57.
HimmelsteinD. U.Quality of care in investor-owned vs not-for-profit HMOs. JAMA282: 159–163, 1999.
