The present study investigated empirically whether condensation-like phenomena, as measured by boundary disturbances, are a reliable and internally-consistent phenomena in the dreams, Rorschach responses, and preconscious perceptions of the same individual. Subjects kept dream logs for two weeks and were administered the Rorschach and a subliminal perception task which involved the presentation of both a subliminal and supraliminal stimulus. Visual condensation was positively correlated for the dream and Rorschach protocols on most measures. Further, Rorschach boundary disruption was significantly associated with the amount of incorporation of the subliminal stimulus in subjects' drawings of the supraliminal stimulus. These results suggest that primary process mechanisms are evident in both conscious and nonconscious mentation and support a reconceptualization of primary process in terms of actual perceptual mechanisms which is of potential heuristic value in the empirical elucidation of dreams, creativity, and preconscious perception.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
HoltR., A Method for Assessing Primary Process Manifestations and Their Control in Rorschach Responses, in Rorschach Psychology, RickersM. (ed.), Kreiger Publishing Company, New York, pp. 375–419, 1977.
2.
NoyP., The Psychoanalytic Theory of Cognitive Development, The Psychoanalytic Study of the Child, 34, pp. 169–216, 1979.
3.
FosshageJ., The Psychological Function of Dreams, Psychoanalysis and Contemporary Thought, 6, pp. 641–649, 1983.
4.
FreudS., The Interpretation of Dreams, StrachyJ. L. (ed. and trans.), Avon Books, New York, 1965/1900.
5.
OchseR., A New Look at Primary Process Thinking and Its Relation to Inspiration, New Ideas in Psychology, 7, pp. 315–330, 1989.
6.
PineF.HoltR., Creativity and Primary Process, Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 61, pp. 370–379, 1960.
7.
RussS., Primary Process Thinking, Divergent Thinking, and Coping in Children, Journal of Personality Assessment, 52, pp. 539–548, 1988.
8.
SulerJ., Primary Process Thinking and Creativity, Psychological Bulletin, 88, pp. 144–165, 1980.
9.
SylviaW.ClarkP.MonroeL., Dream Reports of Subjects High and Low in Creative Ability, Journal of General Psychology, 99, pp. 205–211, 1978.
10.
SchwartzF.LazarZ., Contaminated Thinking: A Specimen of the Primary Process, Psychoanalytic Psychology, 1, pp. 319–334, 1984.
11.
BornsteinR.PittmanT. (eds.), Perception Without Awareness, Guilford Press, New York, 1992.
12.
BregerL., Dream Function: An Information-Processing Model, in Clinical-Cognitive Psychology: Models and Integrations, BregerL. (ed.), Prentice Hall, New Jersey, pp. 182–227, 1969.
13.
BucciW., Dual Coding: A Cognitive Model for Psychoanalytic Research, Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 33, pp. 571–607, 1985.
14.
GardnerH., Frames of Mind: The Theory of Multiple Intelligences, Basic Books, New York, 1983.
15.
PalomboS., The Primary Process: A Reconceptualization, Psychoanalytic Inquiry, 5, pp. 405–435, 1985.
16.
PavioA., Imagery and Verbal Processes, Holt, Rinehart, & Winston, 1971.
17.
HuntH., Some Relations between the Cognitive Psychology of Dreams and Dream Phenomenology, The Journal of Mind and Behavior, 7, pp. 213–228, 1986.
18.
CrickF.MitchisonG., REM Sleep and Neural Nets, The Journal of Mind and Behavior, 7, pp. 229–250, 1986.
19.
HuntH., On the Nature of Consciousness, Yale University Press, New Haven, 1995.
20.
ArietiS., Creativity: The Magic Synthesis, Basic Books, New York, 1976.
21.
DominoG., Primary Process Thinking in Dream Reports as Related to Creative Achievement, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 44, pp. 929–932, 1976.
22.
SmithG.CarlssonI., The Creative Process: A Functional Model Based on Empirical Studies from Early Childhood to Middle Age, Psychological Issues Monographs, 57, pp. 1–243, 1990.
23.
BlattS.RitzierB., Thought Disorder and Boundary Disturbance in Psychosis, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42, pp. 370–381, 1974.
24.
BrenneisC., Features of the Manifest Dream in Schizophrenia, Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 153, pp. 81–91, 1971.
25.
LevinR., Ego Boundary Impairment and Thought Disorder in Frequent Nightmare Sufferers, Psychoanalytic Psychology, 7, pp. 529–543, 1990.
26.
JohnsonD.QuinlanD., Representational Boundaries in Role Portrayals among Paranoid and Nonparanoid Schizophrenic Patients, Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 94, pp. 498–506, 1985.
27.
LernerH.SugarmanA.BarbourC., Patterns of Ego Boundary Impairment in Neurotic, Borderline, and Schizophrenic Patients, Psychoanalytic Psychology, 2, pp. 47–66, 1985.
28.
QuinlanD.HarrowM., Boundary Disturbances in Schizophrenia, Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 83, pp. 533–541, 1974.
29.
MaslingJ., Orality, Pathology, and Interpersonal Behavior, in Empirical Studies of Psychoanalytic Theories, Vol. 1, MaslingJ. (ed.), Analytic Press, Hillsdale, New Jersey, 1986.
30.
AuldF.GoldenbergG.WeissJ., Measurement of Primary-Process Thinking in Dream Reports, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 8, pp. 418–426, 1968.
31.
LivingstonG.LevinR., The Effects of Dream Length on the Relationship between Primary Process in Dreams and Creativity, Dreaming, 1, pp. 301–309, 1991.
32.
ExnerJ., The Rorschach: A Comprehensive System, Vol. 1, Wiley, New York, 1993.
33.
HuntH.Ruzycki-HuntK.PariakD.BelickiK., The Relationship between Dream Bizarreness and Imagination: Artifact or Essence?Dreaming, 3, pp. 179–199, 1993.
34.
WoodJ.SebbaD.DominoG., Do Creative People Really Have More Bizarre Dreams? A Reconsideration, Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 9, pp. 3–16, 1989–90.
35.
FisherC., Dreams, Images, and Perceptions: A Study of Unconscious-Preconscious Relationships, Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 4, pp. 5–48, 1956.
